Search Results

Search results for claim form.

10911 items matching your search terms

  1. Form 48 Civil Children Workers Exemption [pdf, 221 KB]

    Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 48 Tax Invoice Civil Legal Aid Fixed Fees Children’s Workers Exemption Appeals Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice...

  2. Dealing with someone else's fines

    ...it to us. Application for cancellation of warning by vehicle owner Back to top If the court seized your vehicle or other property to pay someone else’s fines If your property has been seized by the court to pay someone else’s fine, you can make a claim to it. Fill out the Claim to Seized Property form and post it to us. Claim to seized property If your vehicle has been seized after you were sent a warning letter, and you feel that there are reasons you should get it back, you can apply to c...

  3. [2011] NZEmpC 120 Bourne, Conrad, Turner and NZ Merchant Service Guild Industrial Union of Workers Inc v Real Journeys Ltd [pdf, 305 KB]

    ...4 [2007] ERNZ 271. 5 At [43]. a statutory requirement to provide a properly particularised statement of claim. In that sense, it reinforces the general requirement that a statement of claim should fully, fairly and clearly inform the Court and the defendant of the nature and details of the claim, the relief sought and the grounds upon which it is sought. 6 While proper pleadings play a very important part in ensuring that proceedings are decided fairly and econo...

  4. Heath v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 193 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000064 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 20 BETWEEN GLEN JOSEPH HEATH AND MICHELLE SUZETTE HEATH Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (formerly known as NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND LYNETTE GAY HART (NEE BOLTE) Second Respondent AND DAVID GRAHAM DELAMARE (Removed) Third Respondent AND THORNE DWYER STRUCTURES LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND ROBERT LESLEY REID Fifth Respondent AND JULIAN MATTHEW WOUL

  5. [2022] NZACC 100–Phillips v ACC (25 May 2022) [pdf, 343 KB]

    ...them and the model to succeed. [28] She told the Court that in response, her manager replied by email advising her a Human Resource Representative would have answers to her questions by the end of the week. Later in the week, she said her manager requested that she attend a face to face meeting with her and the HR Representative. [29] She says that although the meeting was in response to her personal agreement, she was not offered the opportunity of having a support person with h...

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [pdf, 321 KB]

    ...unjustified action causing disadvantage in his employment, unjustified dismissal, and breach of contract for failing to provide a safe workplace. In response the department maintained it had acted as a fair and reasonable employer and denied the claims. [3] The Authority held that the department breached contractual and statutory duties owed to the plaintiff and acted in an unjustified way causing him disadvantage in his employment by failing to take reasonably practicable step...

  7. OIA-Use of rough sex defense in court [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 14 November 2024 Ref: OIA 116677 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Use of the ‘rough sex defence’ in court Thank you for your email of 14 October 2024 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the use of the so-called “rough sex d...

  8. [2011] NZEmpC 102 Broughton v Microsoft NZ Ltd second interlocutory [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...is similarly a broad outline of strategy which does not refer to the plaintiff but nevertheless probably covers what was intended to happen to him. [6] The foregoing documents, both individually and collectively, do not appear to amount to a request for legal and human resources advice about a proposed strategy. Rather, they set out the strategy, or at least parts of it, itself. It is necessary in these circumstances to then consider what Ms Doherty, whose affidavit supports the c...

  9. [2020] NZEmpC 67 Maddigan v Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...the defendant in full within a period of 14 days of the date of this judgment. [6] Mr Maddigan asks for an order that he be paid out his accrued long service leave (equivalent to 15 days). The Director-General of Conservation opposes this request on two grounds. I deal with them in reverse order. [7] The second argument is that cl 3.4 of the collective agreement effectively prevents any payment. That provision states that an employee is entitled to long service leave on compl...

  10. [2012] NZEmpC 37 Anto v Planet Spice Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...for challenging a determination is understood. The answer may be for a very basic pro forma challenge to be lodged within the 28-day period so as to preserve the litigant’s rights and at the same time counsel could file and serve a memorandum requesting the Court to give directions that no statement of defence need be filed until the outcome of the legal aid application is known one way or the other. In that way, should the legal aid application be declined, the potential plaintif...