Search Results

1. NI v CT [2020] NZDT 1382 (14 May 2020) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...reasonable farmer? b. If not, is the loss by NI a foreseeable loss? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Has FM Limited acted with a standard of care expected of a reasonable farmer? 4. The relevant law is section 5 of the Animals Law Reform Act 1989 and the law of negligence. When determining negligence, the Tribunal must consider the standard of care expected of a reasonable farmer in the company’s position, the common practice in the locality in relation to fencing...

2. KG v SQ & vehicle testing company [2022] NZDT 125 (4 August 2022) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...are jointly and severally liable to compensate [Applicant’s insurer] for the full cost of repairs. Referee: J P Smith Date: 4 August 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. EF & QF v JD & QN [2021] NZDT 1690 (20 May 2021) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...therefore unable to find that QN and JD misrepresented the kitchen bench and therefore must dismiss that portion of EF and QF’s claim. Referee: Krawczyk DTR Date: 20 May 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. FU Ltd v TB Ltd [2020] NZDT 1394 (4 March 2020) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...District Court [2020] NZDT 1394 APPLICANT FU Ltd RESPONDENT TB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: TB Ltd is to pay the sum of $1559.24 directly to FU Ltd on or before 25 March 2020. Reasons 1. TB Ltd ('TB') performed a WOF inspection for FU Ltd, for a vehicle FU Ltd ('FU') had sold to a customer. The WOF inspection was performed 9 days prior to FU's customer arriving from Wellington to collect the vehicle and drive it home. 2. So...

5. TD v D Ltd [2022] NZDT 70 (1 June 2022) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2021 TD obtained quotes for moving household goods from New Zealand to the United States. After reviewing information received, TD accepted the quote provided by D Ltd and signed a contract with that company. 2. Prior to acceptance of the quote, TD had received an email from D recommending all goods be sighted and packed by their crew. If not, D

6. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...been able to prove that it is more likely than not that N Ltd breached the guarantees outlined above. 26. For these reasons the claim by US and OT is dismissed. Referee: K Johnson Date: 08 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. W Ltd v NC [2022] NZDT 210 (24 November 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Applying the percentage previously discussed, the total compensation awarded is $13,650.00. The parties should discuss a time payment arrangement. Referee: J P Smith Date: 24 November 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. ET v BD Ltd [2022] NZDT 234 (8 December 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...recover the full repair costs, I find that BD is in breach of its contractual obligations to its customer, ET, and is liable to pay his loss of $2000.00 as damages. Referee Perfect Date: 8 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. UH Ltd v BI [2023] NZDT 13 (12 April 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...costs. 3 albeit claiming that she had not agreed to this repair 4 the parties are in disagreement over this point CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 12 April 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

10. IQ & OU v EQ [2022] NZDT 278 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...damages from the supplier (s 32(c)). When the consumer cancels a contract, the Tribunal may award a refund of part, or all of the money paid for the services of the supplier (s 38). The Tribunal shall have regard to the value of any work or services performed by the supplier (s 39). 11. At the first hearing, EQ stated that he had incurred costs of $1,393.00 for the job, including materials purchased, hire fees for digger/driver and labour hours. However, he did not have any evidence to...