Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12935 items matching your search terms

  1. DT v-S Ltd [2019] NZDT 1510 (30 September 2019) [pdf, 96 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1510 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. S Ltd (S) is to pay the sum of $1,199.00 to DT on or before 14 October 2019. 2. If he has not already done so, DT must return the robot vacuum to S within 14 days of receiving the refund. Reasons: 1. On 4 July 2019, DT purchased a [Redacte...

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 236 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 236 EMPC 476/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a stay of execution AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN DHARMENDRA MAHETA Plaintiff AND SKYBUS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED, FORMERLY AIRBUS EXPRESS LIMITED Defendant...

  3. QX v XN Ltd [2024] NZDT 110 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 110 APPLICANT QX RESPONDENT XN Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QX bought a second hand 2017 [motorhome] in 2019. In 2020, when the motorhome had travelled around 8,000 kms, a radiator hose popped off, all the coolant leaked out and the engine overheated, requiring significant repairs. QX says the motorh...

  4. Where to file documents

    You can file your application in the District Court: closest to the defendant’s home or place of business, if that is in New Zealand if the defendant does not live or carry on business in New Zealand (you can choose which District Court) closest to where the actions that led to the claim happened closest to where the property which the claim is about is located. To make sure you file your documents in the correct place, refer to rule 5.1 of the District Court Rules All subsequent application...

  5. Lipschitz v Auckland City Council [pdf, 13 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL WHT: TRI-2007-100-000039 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an Adjudication Claim BETWEEN LOUIS BERNARD LIPSCHITZ and VEROSLAVA LIPSCHITZ L & V LIPSCHITZ TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND RODNEY GRAHAM PRATT Second Respondent

  6. TC & UD v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 406 (15 September 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 406 APPLICANT TC APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay TC and UD $768.70, on or by 14 October 2023. Reasons 2. On 16 and 17 March 2022, D Ltd installed a ducted heatpump in TC and UD’s home. The heatpump has a drain system to remove water which builds up through condensa...

  7. NH & ND v U Ltd [2021] NZDT 1681 (7 December 2021) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...a few weeks. There were delays starting the job, and when the work started, he started to take days off with different excuses or he did not turn up to do anything. 7. Mr U gave excuses of not having enough funds for petrol to travel up to the applicants home to do work on the roof. In the end he stopped turning up for the job which was left unfinished. As it was winter, with the roof work incomplete leaking issues arose, causing damage to the property. 8. The applicants had an i...

  8. BD v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 350 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 350 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: BD is to pay H Ltd the sum of $25,050.87 immediately. Reasons 1. The applicant is disputing his liability to pay invoices he received from the respondent for certain work undertaken, and the respon...

  9. Fifita v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 108 (03 October 2014) [pdf, 124 KB]

    ...engaged Ms Tangilanu to assist them. The complaint alleges Ms Tangilanu promised she would get the complainant a work visa, entered a written agreement that did not comply with the Code, failed to make the application promptly, then belatedly made a request to the Minister and later lodged an application with Immigration New Zealand in relation to the husband. Further, after taking the initial step of making a request of the Minister, she did not have an agreement relating to the subsequen...

  10. Tidmarsh v Glover [pdf, 271 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 01086 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN RUSSELL WILLIAM TIDMARSH and JOY ISABELLE TIDMARSH Claimants AND JOHN GLOVER First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 5 December 2005 Appearances: Russell Tidmarsh and Christopher Twigley for the Claimants John Glover, the First Respondent in person Jeremy Atkinson for the Second Respondent Raymon...