Search Results

1. ADT & CR Insurance Ltd v ZWH [2013] NZDT 221 (9 May 2013) [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...Issues [3] The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (i) Whether ZWH was negligent and caused the damage; (ii) Whether there is any contributory negligence on the part of ADT, and (iii) If ZWH is found liable, whether the costs claimed are reasonable. Decision Was ZWH negligent? [4] ZWH is required to ensure the way is clear before proceeding through the give way onto [road A]. [5] ZWH says he started braking about 200 metres before the intersection...

2. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 17 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...Ors as Trustees of the Picollo Trust – COSTS DECISION File No: TRI 2008-101-000052/ DBH 05463 Citation: [2010] NZWHT Wellington 17 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 16 June 2010 Background This determination is based on applications filed by the first, second and seventh respondents for costs against the claimants pursuant to s91(1) of the 2006 Act. Applications for Costs By Seventh Respondent, Holland Beckett Holland Beckett (HB) sought an order for costs a...

3. HC v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 482 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 482 APPLICANT HC RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. S Ltd is to pay HC $1794.42 on or before 5pm on 6 August 2023. 2. HC is not liable to pay S Ltd any further money. 3. If S Ltd deducts any money from HC’s account after today’s date, 6 July 2023, it is to be refunded to him in full within ten workin...

4. EF v CQ & BQ [2022] NZDT 233 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 233 APPLICANT EF FIRST RESPONDENT CQ SECOND RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: CQ and BQ are jointly and severally liable to pay $506.95 to EF on or before 30 December 2022. Reasons 1. EF signed a sale and purchase agreement with CQ and BQ on 16 December 2021 with settlement on 18 March 2022. During a p...

5. UM v PH Ltd [2021] NZDT 1682 (14 December 2021) [pdf, 173 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1682 APPLICANT UM RESPONDENT PH Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] UM bought two house plants from PH Ltd, represented by national retail manager EX. The plants have not survived, and UM claims a refund of their purchase price on the ground that they are neither of acceptable quality nor f...

6. KM & LM v BN [2023] NZDT 181 (12 July 2023) [pdf, 122 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 181 APPLICANT KM APPLICANT LM RESPONDENT BN The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons Background 1. The parties own properties on [Road], a private road on a semi-rural subdivision in [Town]. 2. Five properties in the subdivision have a right of wa...

7. N Ltd v MX [2023] NZDT 387 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 387 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT MX The Tribunal orders: MX is to pay N Ltd the sum of $28,000.00 by no later than 27 July 2023. Reasons: 1. MX contracted N Ltd to sell his property at [address]. In May 2022, N Ltd presented MX with an offer to purchase from SU. SU offered the sum of $1,500,000 with payment of a...

8. Hubert v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of cover) [2024] NZACC 179 (12 November 2024) [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...decision of 16 June 2021 which provided: Thank you for your application for weekly compensation for the injury that occurred on 04/10/1997. ACC has carefully assessed all the information available and finds that we’re unable to accept your request because this claim was declined due to no physical injury caused by accident (or work-related gradual process). [Emphasis added] [6] The issue on appeal is whether Ms Hubert suffered a precursor physical injury for a coverable wo...

9. [2007] NZEmpC AC 15/07 Gates v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 35 KB]

   GATES V AIR NZ LTD AK AC 15/07 27 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 15/07 ARC 40/04 IN THE MATTER OF de novo challenge to determination AND IN THE MATTER OF application for security for costs and/or a stay of proceedings BETWEEN LINDA GATES Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 March 2007 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Linda Gates, plaintiff Kevin Thompson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 27 March 2007...

10. J v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 95 (05 November 2015) [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...New Zealand to consider regularising his situation. He paid a fee for her services; paying half immediately, with the balance due if she was successful. [2] The complainant believed the matter was progressing. However, Ms Khetarpal did not lodge a request with Immigration New Zealand. Ms Khetarpal later left the practice without filing the request. As a result, the Tribunal considered three potential breaches of professional standards. These were: [2.1] Ms Khetarpal failed to carry out...