Search Results

1. ET & Ors v CG & KG [2024] NZDT 861 (11 October 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...claim from the Respondents payment of $1,630.05 + $402.50 = $2,032.55. Accordingly, this amount is awarded. Referee: DTR Fuli CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Date: 11 October 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. LG v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 818 (14 October 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...costs and refunding the filing fee. Those grounds are not applicable in this case; therefore, I dismiss the application for reimbursement of the filing fee. Referee: DTR Northwood Date: 14 October 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. N Ltd v BQ & EQ [2024] NZDT 842 (12 December 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...without being impacted by some object. In this case, he said, it was clear that the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 shed had blown over the fences, as the photos showed it next to the broken pole. He said that the pole had had a transformer on the top of it, and so was top heavy in a way that other nearby poles were not. [6] EQ said that he had gone to inspect the pole after a power cut occurred. He had found the shed by the pole, perhaps two metres away from it, and he had...

4. ED v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 465 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...the monies paid to T Ltd for the Noxyde coating amounting to $12,308.41 recognising that ED had to reroof the entire property at a significantly greater cost. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 12 June 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. DQ v SI [2025] NZDT 67 (3 April 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...between them at the time, I accept DQ’s evidence that SI told her he had caused the damage at the time. I consider the only reason he would have said to that DQ is if he did, in fact, think he had caused the damage. 11. On the basis of the information before me I consider it is reasonable for me to infer that SI accepted liability because he thought he was liable, but that, at that time, he thought the costs of this liability would be covered by his insurance. SI later discovered...

6. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.7 July 2017 [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...Operational Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.7 July 2017 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and ful...

7. Wentzel v Collie [2012] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...had detailed in his assessor’s report. Mr Dibley appeared as a witness for the claimants. He had been the inspector for DBH when the two determinations were made and had prepared two substantive reports and a cladding report for DBH which formed the basis of the determinations. Mr Dibley gave evidence contemporaneously with Mr Templeman. [34] In his report Mr Templeman identified four key deficiencies causing current damage. These were: Cracking in the cladding w...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 199 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...strengthening enforcement of employment standards is also reflected in the first reading of the Bill as to the intended purpose of what became Part 9A.10 The Regulatory Impact Statement prepared by MBIE11 and the Cabinet paper12 that recommended the reforms also referred to the intention being to increase directors’ and others’ liability in circumstances where a company is unable to rectify a breach. [33] That the regime created by the 2016 Amendment was more wide-ranging than

9. T Ltd v EO [2024] NZDT 814 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...dated 27 and 29 June 2024 affirmed the contract. 10. EO disputes that he had engaged T Ltd. He says that his initial communication was exploratory in nature and that T Ltd were never properly authorised to act on his behalf. 11. A contract is formed when there is an agreement between the parties, or where there is a meeting of the minds between them. Often this relies on an offer, and acceptance of that offer. There must also be certainty about the terms that have been agreed to.

10. TTPPR-1 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    Form 1 r 6 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia SECTIONS 8(1)(A) AND 15 TRANS-TASMAN PROCEEDINGS ACT 2010 (NZ) IF THE PERSON TO BE SERVED IS NOT DESCRIBED IN THE INITIATING DOCUMENT AS A DEFENDANT, SUBSTITUTE THE CORRECT DESCRIPTION IN THE HEADING OF THIS NOTICE. Please read this notice and the attached document very carefully. If you have any trouble understanding them, you should get legal advi...