Search Results

1. PG Ltd v KH Ltd & JC Ltd [2014] NZDT 1346 (31 October 2014) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...I am satisfied the length and nature of KH’s inaction after discovering the mistake raises a valid estoppel. I dismiss KH’s counterclaim. Referee: J Costigan Date: 31 October 2014 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings On application of a party to the proceedings, the Disputes Tribunal may order a rehearing of the proceedings, on such terms as it thinks fit. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can obtain an applicati...

2. McKeogh v Attorney-General (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2017] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...conference. Be that as it may, given the Tribunal’s current workload it is unlikely that a teleconference can be arranged inside the next two months. De facto, the Attorney-General is therefore likely (but not guaranteed) to have the two months requested. ORDERS [21] The following orders are made: [21.1] The application by the Attorney-General for an order under s 92D (that the complaint by the plaintiffs be referred back to the Human Rights Commission) is declined. [21.2] The...

3. Judge v Care Park New Zealand Limited [2023] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...vehicle that had over 20” parking tickets. Ms Threadgold asked Ms Pepere for the registration number, make and model of the vehicle and indicated Wintec would try and identify the staff member. Ms Pepere did not provide this additional information requested. [5] On 18 February 2016 Ms Threadgold emailed Ms Pepere granting permission to clamp the vehicle after 25 February 2016. Ms Threadgold also indicated that Wintec had located the owner of the vehicle and that the vehicle owner sa...

4. IN Ltd v NB [2022] NZDT 74 (22 February 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...made honestly. [21] Thus, the claim is dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Referee: C Hawes Date: 22 February 2022 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. CN v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 744 (26 November 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...Tribunal to arrange the collection of the various garments which were provided to the Tribunal for this hearing. 39. The claim is dismissed. Referee: P Byrne Date: 26 November 2024. Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. MC v IS [2025] NZDT 145 (24 March 2025) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...para 35, per Lord Leggatt f. 5 Buckley : The Law of Negligence and Nuisance (6th ed, 2019) : Lexis Advance 6 See Todd on Torts 536747508. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Date: 24 March 2025 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. CT & KT v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 778 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...recognise that the complexities of the international airline booking systems do sometimes (or even more than sometimes) lead to results that have an unfair appearance. Referee: M Wilson Date: 20 December 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

8. Body Corporate 201036 and Unit Owners of Parnell Terraces [2010] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...adjudication. A claimant has the particular definition of being the person who applies for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing. The combination of ―claimant‖ and ―claim‖ as used in s 16 together with the information on how a claim is brought in s 9 in my opinion does not allow the wider meaning of claim as suggested by Mr Rainey. The narrower interpretation of the date on which the claim was brought as being the date the owner or representat...

9. Buck [2010] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 89 KB]

   1 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 34 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6324: VICKI SUSAN BUCK AND LINDSAY WILLIAM LLOYD – 14 JANE DEANS CLOSE, RICCARTON, CHRISTCHURCH ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Vicki Buck and Lindsay Lloyd are the owners of a house at 14 Jane D...

10. Wentzel v Collie [2012] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...had detailed in his assessor’s report. Mr Dibley appeared as a witness for the claimants. He had been the inspector for DBH when the two determinations were made and had prepared two substantive reports and a cladding report for DBH which formed the basis of the determinations. Mr Dibley gave evidence contemporaneously with Mr Templeman. [34] In his report Mr Templeman identified four key deficiencies causing current damage. These were: Cracking in the cladding w...