Search Results

1. ET & Ors v CG & KG [2024] NZDT 861 (11 October 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...claim from the Respondents payment of $1,630.05 + $402.50 = $2,032.55. Accordingly, this amount is awarded. Referee: DTR Fuli CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Date: 11 October 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. LG v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 818 (14 October 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...costs and refunding the filing fee. Those grounds are not applicable in this case; therefore, I dismiss the application for reimbursement of the filing fee. Referee: DTR Northwood Date: 14 October 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. N Ltd v BQ & EQ [2024] NZDT 842 (12 December 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...without being impacted by some object. In this case, he said, it was clear that the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 shed had blown over the fences, as the photos showed it next to the broken pole. He said that the pole had had a transformer on the top of it, and so was top heavy in a way that other nearby poles were not. [6] EQ said that he had gone to inspect the pole after a power cut occurred. He had found the shed by the pole, perhaps two metres away from it, and he had...

4. ED v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 465 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...the monies paid to T Ltd for the Noxyde coating amounting to $12,308.41 recognising that ED had to reroof the entire property at a significantly greater cost. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 12 June 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. DQ v SI [2025] NZDT 67 (3 April 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...between them at the time, I accept DQ’s evidence that SI told her he had caused the damage at the time. I consider the only reason he would have said to that DQ is if he did, in fact, think he had caused the damage. 11. On the basis of the information before me I consider it is reasonable for me to infer that SI accepted liability because he thought he was liable, but that, at that time, he thought the costs of this liability would be covered by his insurance. SI later discovered...

6. Body Corporate 201036 and Unit Owners of Parnell Terraces [2010] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...adjudication. A claimant has the particular definition of being the person who applies for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing. The combination of ―claimant‖ and ―claim‖ as used in s 16 together with the information on how a claim is brought in s 9 in my opinion does not allow the wider meaning of claim as suggested by Mr Rainey. The narrower interpretation of the date on which the claim was brought as being the date the owner or representat...

7. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.7 July 2017 [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...Operational Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.7 July 2017 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and ful...

8. Buck [2010] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 89 KB]

   1 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 34 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6324: VICKI SUSAN BUCK AND LINDSAY WILLIAM LLOYD – 14 JANE DEANS CLOSE, RICCARTON, CHRISTCHURCH ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Vicki Buck and Lindsay Lloyd are the owners of a house at 14 Jane D...

9. TTPPR-1 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   Form 1 r 6 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia SECTIONS 8(1)(A) AND 15 TRANS-TASMAN PROCEEDINGS ACT 2010 (NZ) IF THE PERSON TO BE SERVED IS NOT DESCRIBED IN THE INITIATING DOCUMENT AS A DEFENDANT, SUBSTITUTE THE CORRECT DESCRIPTION IN THE HEADING OF THIS NOTICE. Please read this notice and the attached document very carefully. If you have any trouble understanding them, you should get legal advi...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

    ...application under s 50J of the Act, which occurred on 22 September 2016. [9] Finally, the objection challenged disclosure of communication to or from Foodstuffs as not relevant. The challenges to the objections [10] By the time the parties requested this dispute be resolved on the papers the outstanding issues had narrowed, so they did not involve any argument about documents being subject to legal professional privilege or communication to or from Foodstuffs. The remaining iss...