Search Results

1. MK v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 293 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...safely pack up and arrange for the return all the curtains purchased from S Ltd to them, with shipping of the boxes with the curtains to be paid for by S Ltd. Referee: C Price Date: 01 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. Argyle v Macdee McLennan Construction Ltd & Ors [2012] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...Proffitt, the assessor and Thomas Wutzler, the claimants’ expert. Some defects were also mentioned in Mr Prouse’s report referred to by the parties. Roof and drip edge [25] There was a failure to turn down the ends of the metal roof to form a drip edge (exacerbated by low pitch) and a failure to form a drip edge to the barge flashing over the kitchen roof. There was a lack of cover to the flashings on the north east and south west elevations. The building underlay had...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...contracted out of Marra and into a joint venture entity, and that he would receive the same benefits as those paid to Dominion employees. This was obviously a reference to his earlier conversations with Mr Bailey. [32] The email also referred to a request for an increase in salary; he said he had been given a company vehicle he had used on the joint venture project, as compensation for an increase. On the evidence presented to the Court, the provision of the vehicle was appar...

4. [2019] NZLVT 002 The Trustees of the Jiong Swee Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...are still Plan breaches. She notes also that the Regional Council proposed that potentially interested parties be given an opportunity to join and that NRC subsequently instructed an air quality expert. [26] Further, Ms de Silva confirms that NRC formed the view at the second mediation that the abatement notice was defective and subsequently, in light of that position and legal advice, they withdrew the abatement notice. She notes that the eventual wording adopted for the undertakin...

5. TQ v OD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1426 (16 March 2021) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...reasonable view of the bricks they were not the grey colour scheme described as ‘grey blend.’ 9. Accordingly, I find that OD Ltd is to pay TQ $3,000.00. Referee: A Baker Date: 16th March 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. N Ltd v B Ltd, SL, & I Ltd [2022] NZDT 236 (7 July 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...that the invoice for the clean-up and contamination testing fee is reasonable. Conclusion 22. For the reasons above, SL must pay N LTD, $11,615.00. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 7 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

7. LF & AS v NJ [2023] NZDT 36 (10 February 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...AS and LF are entitled to payment of $771.43, being $600 compensation on account of a breach of their right to quiet enjoyment, and $171.43 Bond refund. Referee: J.F. Tunnicliffe Date: 10 February 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. DT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 225 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...remedy the issue, it follows that under the CGA, the applicant does not have a remedy under section 32 of the CGA and his claim must be dismissed. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 12 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. ET v SC [2024] NZDT 713 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...time, but SC refused to pay. ET had given a barbeque to SC some time before and he asked for it to be returned. SC did not return it. ET filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal. 2. These are claims for $768.95 for the charge for some work performed by the Applicant for the Respondent and the value of a barbeque. 3. The issues to be determined were as follows: a. Has SC breached a legally binding contract with ET to pay for his time in travelling to [Town 1] to deliver a plan...

10. ET & Ors v CG & KG [2024] NZDT 861 (11 October 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...claim from the Respondents payment of $1,630.05 + $402.50 = $2,032.55. Accordingly, this amount is awarded. Referee: DTR Fuli CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Date: 11 October 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...