Search Results

1. T Ltd v EO [2024] NZDT 814 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...dated 27 and 29 June 2024 affirmed the contract. 10. EO disputes that he had engaged T Ltd. He says that his initial communication was exploratory in nature and that T Ltd were never properly authorised to act on his behalf. 11. A contract is formed when there is an agreement between the parties, or where there is a meeting of the minds between them. Often this relies on an offer, and acceptance of that offer. There must also be certainty about the terms that have been agreed to.

2. PG Ltd v KH Ltd & JC Ltd [2014] NZDT 1346 (31 October 2014) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...I am satisfied the length and nature of KH’s inaction after discovering the mistake raises a valid estoppel. I dismiss KH’s counterclaim. Referee: J Costigan Date: 31 October 2014 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings On application of a party to the proceedings, the Disputes Tribunal may order a rehearing of the proceedings, on such terms as it thinks fit. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can obtain an applicati...

3. [2019] NZLVT 002 The Trustees of the Jiong Swee Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...are still Plan breaches. She notes also that the Regional Council proposed that potentially interested parties be given an opportunity to join and that NRC subsequently instructed an air quality expert. [26] Further, Ms de Silva confirms that NRC formed the view at the second mediation that the abatement notice was defective and subsequently, in light of that position and legal advice, they withdrew the abatement notice. She notes that the eventual wording adopted for the undertakin...

4. TQ v OD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1426 (16 March 2021) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...reasonable view of the bricks they were not the grey colour scheme described as ‘grey blend.’ 9. Accordingly, I find that OD Ltd is to pay TQ $3,000.00. Referee: A Baker Date: 16th March 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. N Ltd v B Ltd, SL, & I Ltd [2022] NZDT 236 (7 July 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...that the invoice for the clean-up and contamination testing fee is reasonable. Conclusion 22. For the reasons above, SL must pay N LTD, $11,615.00. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 7 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

6. LF & AS v NJ [2023] NZDT 36 (10 February 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...AS and LF are entitled to payment of $771.43, being $600 compensation on account of a breach of their right to quiet enjoyment, and $171.43 Bond refund. Referee: J.F. Tunnicliffe Date: 10 February 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. DT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 225 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...remedy the issue, it follows that under the CGA, the applicant does not have a remedy under section 32 of the CGA and his claim must be dismissed. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 12 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. ET v SC [2024] NZDT 713 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...time, but SC refused to pay. ET had given a barbeque to SC some time before and he asked for it to be returned. SC did not return it. ET filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal. 2. These are claims for $768.95 for the charge for some work performed by the Applicant for the Respondent and the value of a barbeque. 3. The issues to be determined were as follows: a. Has SC breached a legally binding contract with ET to pay for his time in travelling to [Town 1] to deliver a plan...

9. ET & Ors v CG & KG [2024] NZDT 861 (11 October 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...claim from the Respondents payment of $1,630.05 + $402.50 = $2,032.55. Accordingly, this amount is awarded. Referee: DTR Fuli CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Date: 11 October 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. LG v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 818 (14 October 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

    ...costs and refunding the filing fee. Those grounds are not applicable in this case; therefore, I dismiss the application for reimbursement of the filing fee. Referee: DTR Northwood Date: 14 October 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...