Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 16 Aotearoa Coolstores Ltd V Waara [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...investigation meeting, he did not provide any written statements or submissions or documentary evidence at or before the investigation. These events were recorded in the Authority’s determination that ACL seeks to challenge. [5] I therefore requested a report from the Authority, under s 181(2) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (“the Act”). That request required the Authority, under s 181(1)(a)-(b), to submit to the Court a written report giving the Authority’s assessmen...

2. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.7 July 2017 [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...Operational Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.7 July 2017 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and ful...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...contracted out of Marra and into a joint venture entity, and that he would receive the same benefits as those paid to Dominion employees. This was obviously a reference to his earlier conversations with Mr Bailey. [32] The email also referred to a request for an increase in salary; he said he had been given a company vehicle he had used on the joint venture project, as compensation for an increase. On the evidence presented to the Court, the provision of the vehicle was appar...

4. DS v NS [2018] NZDT 1454 (7 May 2018) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...by the dog. 11. In this case, DS was obliged to spend $779.10 on a vet’s care for her dog, including anaesthetic. This is therefore the amount payable by NS. Referee: M Wilson Date: 7 May 2018 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you...

5. BS v TT [2019] NZDT 1485 (5 December 2019) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...situation, the person who was ultimately liable must reimburse the person who was compelled to pay. 6. BS said that [Telecommunications provider] has been compelling her to make payments on her account for the phone, although she did not bring information to the hearing that would enable me to determine how much has been paid to date and how much is still owing. However, TT has received the benefit of the phone itself together with the insurance, and I find that it would be unconscionabl...

6. BI v SQ Incorporated [2020] NZDT 1366 (26 November 2020) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...rust repair was needed, it is likely that that cost would have been higher than the $350.00 charged, so the betterment to BI was significant. Referee: J Perfect Date: 26 November 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

7. KH v KL [2022] NZDT 178 (4 October 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...motherboard following winning the auction for it on U? b) If so, what is Mr KH’s loss? Is Mr KL in breach of contract by not paying Mr KH for the motherboard following winning the auction for it on U? 4. Parties to a contract must perform their respective obligations. If they do not, they will be in breach and need to account for any loss caused to the other party to the contract. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 5. In a U transaction such as in this case, a leg...

8. I Ltd v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 727 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...in the position they would have been in had the contract not been breached. This means that the respondent should pay the applicant $2,507.68. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 18 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. SG v QN [2022] NZDT 253 (16 December 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...party was at fault in what happened. Therefore, I find that QN cannot be held responsible for the crash and is not liable to pay for the damage. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 16 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. UL v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 383 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...provided, I cannot be satisfied that it was unreasonable that the laptop only lasted for three years, and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Cowie DTR Date: 29 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...