12555 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 218 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT NI SECOND RESPONDENT DI The Tribunal orders: a. The claim against NI was withdrawn at the start of the hearing and is dismissed. b. DI is to pay to SI $6,500.00 by 16 January 2023. Reasons: 1. Today’s hearing was a rehearing of the dispute which means it starts afresh fr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 250 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT IQ The Tribunal orders: IQ is to pay NN $1500.00 by 22/12/2022 Reasons: 1. NN was offered a [car] from her friend IQ for $3500. They discussed aspects of the car and the deal and NN took it for a short test drive. 2. IQ told her the CV joint was faulty and she would have it replaced the...
...complainant personally applied for a visitor visa online. An interim visa was granted by Immigration New Zealand on 26 October, to come into effect when the working holiday visa expired and to expire when a decision was made on her visitor visa application. [5] The complainant’s working holiday visa expired on 2 or 3 November 2016. At about this time, she approached Pioneer to obtain entry to an education institute and an accompanying student visa. On 3 November, she signed a...
2013 Chief Judge's MB 272 IN THE MAoRI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: A20090004324 CJ2009/9 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mura Rattenbury BETWEEN CORRIENE FISHER Applicant AND 8 October 2012 (Heard at Wellington) NEVILLE FISHER Respondent Appearances: Coniene Fisher, Applicant Judgment: 22 May 2013 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2013 Chief Judge's MB 273 Introduction [1] This application, fi...
...the Applicant, including money anticipated to be received from WINZ, and the Applicant receiving all of the files of the deceased and other documents. [15] The last part states (at number four), “this is a full and final settlement of all claims”, required the Applicant to make no more complaints of any kind to any authority concerning the Practitioner, that there was to be no litigation against the Practitioner, and that production of this settlement document was to be a co...
...replied suggesting Ms XY’s enquiries be directed to Mr SR. For the purposes of this review, the difference is inconsequential because Mr HG does not contend that he provided explanations, information or otherwise cooperated with Ms XY as she had requested. [15] Between 2010 and 2012 Ms RM and Ms PR made a number of enquiries, and had a number of meetings.6 Ms PR says she is limited by Ms XY’s privilege from detailing what those enquiries were, or who the meetings were with. H...
...[2018] NZEmpC 49 [18 May 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 49 EMPC 337/2017 IN THE MATTER OF of a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to extend time BETWEEN TALBOT AGRICULTURE LIMITED Plaintiff AND FRANKLYN WATE Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 7, 8 and 14 May 2018 Appearances: D Caldwell, counsel for plaintiff...
...at Whakarongotai Marae in Waikanae, the Muaūpoko research programme was completed and ten research hui were held throughout the district for various research reports. The year concluded with three hearing weeks for the prioritised Muaūpoko claims. The PkM inquiry team has also seen a number of changes with the departure of report writer Paul Husbands and claims co-ordinators Mema Tuigamala and Sam Sygrove. We welcome our new claims co-ordinator, Jay Cameron-Hamiora and hi...
Form 1 r 6 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia SECTIONS 8(1)(A) AND 15 TRANS-TASMAN PROCEEDINGS ACT 2010 (NZ) IF THE PERSON TO BE SERVED IS NOT DESCRIBED IN THE INITIATING DOCUMENT AS A DEFENDANT, SUBSTITUTE THE CORRECT DESCRIPTION IN THE HEADING OF THIS NOTICE. Please read this notice and the attached document very carefully. If you have any trouble understanding them, you should get legal advi...
...community to disrupt my involvement with the charity organisation I currently run. 3 [11] The applicants’ lawyer wrote to the respondent expressing his opinion that no family harm could be established on the basis of Mr X’s affidavit and requesting that the application be withdrawn. [12] The Court issued a minute directing Mr X to file further affidavit evidence by a specified date and setting a time limit for any affidavit evidence in response from the applicants. [13] The a...