HI v UT [2025] NZDT 211 (5 May 2025) [pdf, 167 KB]
...elects not to have the wardrobe returned, then UT is to pay HI the sum of $3,300.00 on or before 30 May 2025. Reasons 1. In April 2024, HI purchased [address] from UT for $950,000. HI attended two open homes and also received a property information pack which included a pre inspection report dated 26 March 2024 which had been ordered on behalf of UT by his real estate agent. 2. The issues to resolve the claim are: a. Was the wardrobe a chattel or a fixture? b. Did UT...