Search Results

Search results for claim form.

13076 items matching your search terms

  1. Morrison - Te Kaha No.2C Block (2014) 105 Waiariki MB 183 (105 WAR 183) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...183 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110010365 A20130009571 UNDER Sections 289 and 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act IN THE MATTER OF Te Kaha No. 2C Block KATHLEEN MAY MORRISON Applicant Hearing: 24 January 2012, 48 Waiāriki MB 78-87 (Te Kaha Site visit) 7 March 2012, 51 Waiāriki MB 102-127 8 May 2012, 54 Waiāriki MB 284 29 June 2012, 57 Waiāriki MB 121-124 12 September 2012, 62 Waiāriki MB 41...

  2. USM v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 291 (27 September 2022) [pdf, 153 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 291 APPLICANT AND COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT USM RESPONDENT AND COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders and declares: 1. USM is to pay Q Ltd $95.00 by 11 October 2022. 2. USM is not liable to pay Q Ltd $321.71. 3. Q Ltd’s claim for a balance of $330.35 is dismissed. Reasons: 1. USM seeks a declarat...

  3. KN & NN v FO Ltd [2024] NZDT 69 (12 January 2024) [pdf, 137 KB]

    ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 69 APPLICANT KN APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT FO Ltd The Tribunal orders: KN and NN are not liable to pay $485.00 to FO Ltd. Reasons 1. The Applicants seek a declaration of non-liability in relation to an invoice for the cost of repairs to the fibre cable on the property at [address]. 2. The fibre cable connection was damaged when a tree planted along the inside boundary of the...

  4. CI v MT [2023] NZDT 514 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...10 November 2023. 2. If $10,795.02 is not paid by 10 November 2023 then interest of $508.55 will be added for enforcement purposes. Reasons Is MT able to contest the cost of work in invoice #0939 for $7,583.10? 1. In July 2021 MT requested CI, trading as [(J Design)] to provide services regarding the renovation of her house. CI and MT had known each other for a long period of time. MT not request a fixed price for the work she was asking J Design to complete. The w...

  5. LCRO 17/2014 SM v TR and DH [pdf, 146 KB]

    LCRO 17/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SM Applicant AND TR and DH Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] SM has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee to take no further action...

  6. OIA-105137.pdf [pdf, 438 KB]

    ...4 July 2023 DiM,il3D Section 9(2)(a) Tenakoe llll Justice Centre I 19 Aitken, Street OX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 105137 Official Information Act request: Independent Electoral Review information Thank you for your email of 8 June 2023, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Independent Electoral Review. Your requests and my responses are...

  7. UL v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 383 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

    (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 383 APPLICANT UL RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UL purchased a “remanufactured” [laptop] from Q Ltd for $781.13 on 2 March 2020. Almost three years later (on 2 February 2023,) the laptop’s screen suddenly went black, and UL has been unable to use it. He claimed the laptop was not of acceptable quality as it was not...

  8. SG v QN [2022] NZDT 253 (16 December 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 253 APPLICANT SG RESPONDENT QN RESPONDENT INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 18 May 2022, QN crashed into the rear of SG’s car, which was parked. SG, who was not insured for the damage, now claims $6,000.00 from QN for the damage to his car, which was written...

  9. NC v MD [2021] NZDT 1348 (12 March 2021) [pdf, 208 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1348 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT MD The Tribunal orders: MD is to pay $665.00 to NC on or before 2 April 2021. Reasons 1. In September 2020 MD approached the neighbour of her tenanted property, NC, to consult him about shrubs/planting that she wished to have removed from a garden that straddles the boundar...

  10. Roberts v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2022] NZACC 208 [pdf, 192 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 208 ACR 266/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JASON ROBERTS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 10 November 2022 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua Nui A Kahumatamomoe Appearances: Mr C Leaf for the Appellant P McBride for the Accident C