12555 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 167 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT CU SECOND RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim by SN against CU and KU is dismissed. Reasons 1. SN engaged a contractor to build a boundary fence on her rural property. SN now brings a claim against CU and KU for $8,682.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Wa...
[2015] NZSHD 10 SHD Number 15 / 024357 IN THE MATTER of the Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2004 AND IN THE MATTER of an application by DORIS WAKEFIELD of Dargaville for a waiver of disqualification under s/23 of the Act BEFORE THE LICENSING AUTHORITY OF SECONDHAND DEALERS AND PAWNBROKERS DECISION The Application [1] Doris Wakefield (“the applicant”) applied to the Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers (...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1452 APPLICANT HB Ltd T/A BB Parts RESPONDENT NH SECOND RESPONDENT KX The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. KX is to pay HB Ltd trading as BB Parts $2,013.03 by 4pm on 26 April 2017. 2. HB Ltd trading as BB Parts’ claim against NH is dismissed. Reasons 1. HB Ltd, trading as BB Parts (APPCO), had given a credit ac...
...under the Bill of Rights Act, which is limited by the extension of limitation periods to that Act in cl 11(2)(c); and 1.2 The right of non-discrimination on the grounds of ethnicity, which might be seen to be limited by the separate provision for claims in respect of Maori customary land (cl 26). 2. The Bill, which replaces the Limitation Act 1950, provides for the clarification and certain substantive changes to limitation periods for civil claims. In particular, the Bill: 2.1 Replace...
...[2024] NZLCRO 051 Ref: LCRO 003/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RP Applicant AND TG Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, Mrs RP, has applied for review of a decision of the [Area] Standards C...
...counsel for the plaintiff Judgment: 25 November 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] It is now after 5.00 pm on a Friday afternoon. Staff have voluntarily stayed on in the office to deal with this matter. [2] An urgent application has been referred to me in which Ms Kennedy seeks a non-publication order suppressing any identifying details of two overseas exchange students allegedly identified in a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. 1...
...[2024] NZLCRO 069 Ref: LCRO 13/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OB and HG Applicants AND NC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicants, Ms OB and Mr HG, have applied for review of a decision by t...
...Act. In particular, they will receive access to training and agreed pay rates back- dated to 1 July 2017. Employers will receive additional funding to offset the additional costs imposed by the Bill. 6. The Bill extinguishes any current pay equity claims and bars future claims by these workers until June 2022. The Bill also changes the name of the principal Act (resulting in consequential amendments to the Employment Relations Act 2000) and makes other amendments in order to bring vocati...
...sought was for the allowance to be paid to the appellant as at the date of incapacity. Mr McCarthy also asked for copies of relevant documentation. [16] Unfortunately, the entire evidence for the appeal comprises the documents referred to above, the forms supporting the original RE assessment, the applications for review, all, apart from one of the applications for review, being filed by the appellant. [17] Despite being obliged under s 108(4) to provide copies of all relevant docu...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 677 APPLICANT SL RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, SL purchased a used imported [vehicle] advertised as having 57,100 km, for $20,600.00. 2. SL claims $23,269.74, being a refund of the purchase price and the balance in costs he says are associated with the maintenance and...