12555 items matching your search terms
...HALSE v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2023] NZEmpC 53 [4 April 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 53 EMPC 425/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN ALLAN GEOFFREY HALSE Applicant AND EM...
PARKER V SILVER FERN FARMS LTD WN WC 26/09 18 November 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 26/09 WRC 30/09 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time BETWEEN JONATHON PARKER Applicant AND SILVER FERN FARMS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 16 November 2009 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: A, Counsel for Applicant T P Cleary, Counsel for Respondent Judgment: 18 November 2009 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] For reason...
...NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 [5 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 ARC 43/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CATHERINE TAN Plaintiff AND MORNININGSTAR INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION LIMITED T/A MORNINGSTAR PRESCHOOL Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 23 May and 4 June 20...
...ANN BOULGER NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 100 [29 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 100 EMPC 156/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a search order BETWEEN IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Applicant AND MICHELLE ANN BOULGER Respondent Hearing: 26 June 2015 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: K Dunn, counsel for the applicant B Edwards and C Hallowes, counsel for the respondent Judgment: 29...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 86 APPLICANT GE RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim is struck out Reasons 1. On or about 31 October 2021, M Ltd attended [Road A] to price a refurbishment of a deck for GE. M Ltd presented GE with a quote for $6,301.25 plus GST which outlined the scope of work to be und...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 455 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $447.99 to BD on or before Thursday, 27 June 2024. REASONS 1. The Applicant, BD, needed her [Appliance Brand] washing machine (“the Machine”) repaired because it was showing an F53 error code fault. BD was referred by [Appliance Brand] to the Respond...
...requested, and the practitioners gave Mr HS on the telephone from time to time. [9] The main issue concerning the [hardware store] matter was whether Mr HS asked the practitioners to draft submissions for the Disputes Tribunal hearing. Or, as Mr HS claims, were they to provide advice in the form of “notes” or a “letter” about the submissions prepared by Mr HS’s previous lawyer. Complaint [10] Mr HS lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 27 May...
...LIMITED v JAMES LIMERICK CAMPBELL [2024] NZEmpC 192 [3 October 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 192 EMPC 469/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a search order BETWEEN MGE NEW ZEALAND 2010 LIMITED First Applicant AND MCKAY LIMITED Second Applicant AND JAMES LIMERICK CAMPBELL First Respondent AND JAYCEE ELECTRIX LIMITED...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] There are two preliminary issues to be resolved before this case can go to hearing. The first is whether Evolution E-Business Ltd (Evolution) should be able to defend Benjamin Smith’s counterclaim because the time for filing a statement of defence to that has expired. The second issue is whether the company should give security for costs on its claims. [2] Should the plaintiff have leave to file out of time a statement of de...