Search Results

1. [2022] NZIACDT 19 – TA v Tian (Sanctions) (25 July 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: L Lim, counsel Complainant: R Sathiyanathan, K L Chiu, counsel Adviser: Self-represented 2 INTRODUCTION [1] Ms Ying Tian (aka Tina Qin), the adviser, acted for TA, the complainant, on numerous unsuccessful applications. She did not tell him of the outcome of the applications and largely had no instructions from him to make them. For a prolonged period, she pretended to be acting for him but was not actually undertaking any work on his be...

2. [2007] NZEmpC AC 14/07 Talakai v Amcor Flexibles Ltd [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...TALAKAI V AMCOR FLEXIBLES LTD AK AC 14/07 26 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 14/07 ARC 117/05 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN SIALE TALAKAI Plaintiff AND AMCOR FLEXIBLES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 14 February and 20 March 2007 Judgment: 26 March 2007 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDG...

3. P Ltd v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1643 (8 October 2021) [pdf, 145 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1643 APPLICANT P Limited RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay P Ltd a total of $3500.00 on or before Friday 29 October 2021. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In September 2019, P Ltd contracted with Q Ltd to supply and fit 4 new tyres, rims and a 2 inch suspension lift kit...

4. B Ltd v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 505 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 505 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay B Ltd $3,361.33 by no later than 20th July 2024. Reasons 1. The Applicant states that pursuant to a sub-lease agreement with the Respondent, the Applicant is to ensure that all fixtures and fittings are to be serviced regularly by a qualified service provider (cl...

5. KE v TX [2022] NZDT 277 (2 December 2022) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 277 APPLICANT KE RESPONDENT TX The Tribunal orders: TX is to pay KE $12,100.00 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, KE listed his [vehicle] for sale on Trademe. During the auction, a bid meeting the reserve price of $120,000.00 was placed from TX’s Trademe account. No other bids w...

6. [2021] NZACC 128 - CM v ACC (04 August 2021) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: The appellant in person Mr C Light for the respondent Judgment: 4 August 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE [Section 360(1) – Claim for cover under former Acts filed after 1 April 2002 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue on this appeal is a decision dated 26 July 2019 from the...

7. KT v HI & KX [2023] NZDT 403 (28 August 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 403 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT HI SECOND RESPONDENT KX The Tribunal orders: 1. HI is to pay $5,474.85 to KT on or before 4pm on 15 September 2023. Reasons: 2. On 27 May 2023, KT purchased a [vehicle] from HI for $6,400.00 for his daughter. The vehicle had been advertised on [the Internet]. KT is not able...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 121 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...[2018] NZEmpC 121 [15 October 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 121 EMPC 221/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of execution BETWEEN SOLID ROOFING LIMITED Plaintiff AND SAMUEL NEWMAN Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Vandenberg, agent for plaintiff R Tomkinson, counsel for...

9. Hide v Official Assignee (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...general rule is that a party cannot be compelled to call a particular witness. If the opposing party wants any witness to attend the hearing, a witness summons can be applied for. The process by which this is done is explained in Annexure A “Requesting a Witness Summons”. Particular attention is drawn to the need for the Tribunal to be satisfied the intended witness can give material evidence. Ordinarily this means a written application must be made to the Tribunal by the pa...

10. [2009] NZEmpC AC 10/09 Webb v New Zealand Tramways and Public Passengers Transport Union Inc [pdf, 21 KB]

    ...TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INC AK AC 10/09 26 March 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 10/09 ARC 85/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out part of statement of claim BETWEEN BRIAN ALEXANDER WEBB Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND TRAMWAYS AND PUBLIC PASSENGERS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 25 March 2009 (Heard at Au...