Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12554 items matching your search terms

  1. AG Ltd v ZT Ltd [2014] NZDT 607 (6 May 2014) [pdf, 23 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 607 BETWEEN AG Ltd APPLICANT AND ZT Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 6 May 2014 Referee: Referee Costigan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZT Ltd (the respondent) is to pay AG Ltd (the applicant) $1,144.25 on or before 20 May 2014. Facts [1] AG Ltd (the applicant) agreed to hire a stand to ZT Ltd (the respondent) at the [industry event] in 2013 for $2,288.50. It...

  2. DQ v IC [2023] NZDT 710 (17 December 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 710 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In December 2022 DQ purchased an eight-week old purebred [puppy] from IC for $5,000.00. DQ and IC agreed on terms which are contained in the TC Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”), a copy of which IC provided in evidence. 2. The puppy is...

  3. [2011] NZEmpC 119 French v ACC adjournment [pdf, 58 KB]

    ...unjustifiable and other wise carried out in breach of the defendant’s duties to the plaintiff. In the course of the Authority’s investigation, the defendant reversed that change, restoring the plaintiff to his former position. The plaintiff claimed nonetheless that he had been disadvantaged. The Authority determined 1 that the 1 [2011] NZERA Wellington 2 plaintiff had been effectively returned to his former position and t...

  4. LU v VK LCRO 209 / 2011 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 67 KB]

    ...title to land). No undertaking was given by the Practitioner’s firm and in 1993 the firm released the sum of $6,000 to its client. A Disputes Tribunal later concluded that the Practitioner’s client was in breach of the contract for having requested payment of this money to him. 2 [5] The adjudicator noted that the Applicant sought repayment of this sum by the Practitioner’s client back to the Practitioner’s firm for holding. However, the adjudicator explained...

  5. KD & JBH Ltd v GU Ltd [2022] NZDT 71 (12 January 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 71 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT GU Limited C/- G APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) JBH Limited The Tribunal orders: GU Ltd is to pay JBH Ltd $4,928.60 within 28 days. The first $400.00 of this sum received by JBH Ltd is to be paid by JBH Ltd to KD within 7 days of its receipt by JBH Ltd. Reasons...

  6. ZY v BT [2023] NZDT 784 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 784 APPLICANT ZY RESPONDENT BT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BT to pay J Ltd $9,003.96 by 15 January 2024. Reasons. 1. On the12 January 2023 ZY’s vehicle [registration number] was traveling along [a road] in [city]. ZY stopped when traffic in front of him stopped because of a red...

  7. TQ v IU [2023] NZDT 117 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 117 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT IU The Tribunal orders: IU is to pay TQ $983.49 by 20 March 2023. Reasons 1. TQ’s claim seeks the return of a [redacted] vehicle. 2. TQ submitted that she purchased the vehicle from IU, but he has refused to give it to her. 3. The hearing took place by phone on 1 March 2023. T...

  8. U Ltd v DI & SI [2023] NZDT 576 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 576 APPLICANT U Ltd RESPONDENT DI SECOND RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal orders: 1. The Respondents, DI and SI are ordered to pay the Applicant U Ltd a sum of $900.45 on or before 5pm on 8 December 2023. Reasons: 2. This matter was set down for a teleconference before me at 11.30am on 20 November 2023. I was unab...

  9. BN v LG Ltd [2024] NZDT 611 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 611 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT LG Ltd The Tribunal orders: LG Ltd is to pay BN $1,499.00 on or before 1 October 2024. Reasons 1. BN ordered a custom-made couch from LG Ltd and paid $1,499.00. It was a term of the contract that it would be delivered to BN’s home. However, LG Ltd did not successfully deliver the couch, despite sever...

  10. EU & SU v KC [2024] NZDT 615 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 615 APPLICANT EU C/- SU Trust APPLICANT SU C/- SU Trust RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: 1. KC is to pay the SU Trust $14,775.00 on or before 30 August 2024. 2. The SU Trust is to organise the construction of a fence and retaining wall on the boundary between [Address 1] and [Address 2]. The base of the retaining wall i...