Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 194 Tuala v Linfox Logistics (N.Z.) Ltd [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] In this proceeding, the plaintiff, Mr Vianney Tuala, has challenged de novo two determinations of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 In its first determination dated 13 January 2015, the Authority rejected a claim by Mr Tuala that he had been unjustifiably dismissed by his former employer, the defendant, Linfox Logistics (N.Z.) Limited (Linfox). In its second determination dated 27 February 2015, the Authority made a costs award against Mr Tual...

2. Roberts v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2022] NZACC 208 [pdf, 192 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 208 ACR 266/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JASON ROBERTS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 10 November 2022 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua Nui A Kahumatamomoe Appearances: Mr C Leaf for the Appellant P McBride for the Accident C

3. Hastie and Dredge TRI 2023-100-001 Procedural Order 6 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...ARCHITECT LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1496058) Fourth Respondent AND DSF BUILDERS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1863635) Fifth Respondent AND CONTRACT HOLDINGS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 636388) Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 6 Removal applications by first and second respondents Dated 5 March 2024 2 Introduction [1] The first and second respondents have jointly applied to be removed from this proceeding under s 112 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution...

4. Hood v American Express International (NZ) Inc (Discovery) [2015] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...27 October 2009 the Privacy Commissioner informed AMEX that he had decided to take no further action and to discontinue the investigation of the complaint. [2.9] The present proceedings were filed on 24 September 2013. The amended statement of claim [3] By amended statement of claim dated 1 August 2014 Mr Hood alleges information privacy principles 2, 6 and 7 were breached by AMEX in three separate respects: [3.1] Collecting information about him from Veda Advantage (NZ) Ltd without...

5. Equal Pay Amendment Bill Supplementary Order Paper [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...formally vetted for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of Rights Act’). However, it is possible for the Attorney-General to bring the House’s attention to relevant matters under Standing Order 372(1), and you have requested that this Supplementary Order Paper be formally vetted. 3. Therefore, we have considered whether the Equal Pay Amendment Bill Supplementary Order Paper (‘the SOP’) is consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bil...

6. LCRO 17/2014 SM v TR and DH [pdf, 146 KB]

   LCRO 17/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SM Applicant AND TR and DH Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] SM has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee to take no further action...

7. CI v MT [2023] NZDT 514 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...10 November 2023. 2. If $10,795.02 is not paid by 10 November 2023 then interest of $508.55 will be added for enforcement purposes. Reasons Is MT able to contest the cost of work in invoice #0939 for $7,583.10? 1. In July 2021 MT requested CI, trading as [(J Design)] to provide services regarding the renovation of her house. CI and MT had known each other for a long period of time. MT not request a fixed price for the work she was asking J Design to complete. The w...

8. UX v J Ltd [2023] NZDT 105 (16 March 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 105 APPLICANT UX RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. J Ltd is to pay $26,000.00 to UX on or before 14 April 2023. 2. The [Utility Terrain Vehicle] remains the property of UX to dispose of as he chooses. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On or about 6 August 2021, UX purchased a new [Utility Terrain Vehicle...

9. HT v SE [2020] NZDT 1397 (15 May 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...

10. ZC v NU Ltd [2018] NZDT 1481 (2 August 2018) [pdf, 195 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1481 APPLICANT ZC RESPONDENT NU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: NU Limited is to pay the sum of $182.50 to ZC on or before Thursday 16 August 2018. Reasons: 1. ZC had a new kilt specially made in an unusual tartan and sent from Scotland as an early birthday present for her daughter, who does highland danci...