12922 items matching your search terms
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 383 APPLICANT UL RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UL purchased a “remanufactured” [laptop] from Q Ltd for $781.13 on 2 March 2020. Almost three years later (on 2 February 2023,) the laptop’s screen suddenly went black, and UL has been unable to use it. He claimed the laptop was not of acceptable quality as it was not...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 253 APPLICANT SG RESPONDENT QN RESPONDENT INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 18 May 2022, QN crashed into the rear of SG’s car, which was parked. SG, who was not insured for the damage, now claims $6,000.00 from QN for the damage to his car, which was written...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1348 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT MD The Tribunal orders: MD is to pay $665.00 to NC on or before 2 April 2021. Reasons 1. In September 2020 MD approached the neighbour of her tenanted property, NC, to consult him about shrubs/planting that she wished to have removed from a garden that straddles the boundar...
...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 69 APPLICANT KN APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT FO Ltd The Tribunal orders: KN and NN are not liable to pay $485.00 to FO Ltd. Reasons 1. The Applicants seek a declaration of non-liability in relation to an invoice for the cost of repairs to the fibre cable on the property at [address]. 2. The fibre cable connection was damaged when a tree planted along the inside boundary of the...
...remedies exist for breach of duty, including in the handling of claims; c. requires consumer insurance policies to be clear and in plain language; d. addresses some long-standing technical issues with insurance law, including: i. rules around information provided by policy holders to insurance intermediaries; ii. the operation of exclusions which are not causative of loss; iii. the ability to claim against an insurer when the policy holder is insolvent; iv. rules around time limi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 345 APPLICANT LF RESPONDENT JN SECOND RESPONDENT Christchurch Insolvency and Trustee Service THIRD OR RESPONDENT BH FOURTH RESPONDENT C Ltd FIFTH RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. JN agreed to store an artwork...
...183 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110010365 A20130009571 UNDER Sections 289 and 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act IN THE MATTER OF Te Kaha No. 2C Block KATHLEEN MAY MORRISON Applicant Hearing: 24 January 2012, 48 Waiāriki MB 78-87 (Te Kaha Site visit) 7 March 2012, 51 Waiāriki MB 102-127 8 May 2012, 54 Waiāriki MB 284 29 June 2012, 57 Waiāriki MB 121-124 12 September 2012, 62 Waiāriki MB 41...
GARTH MURRAY CUNNINGHAM v HEALTHALLIANCE NZ LIMITED [2025] NZEmpC 24 [20 February 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 24 EMPC 221/2023 EMPC 2/2024 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a verification order BETWEEN GARTH MURRAY CUNNINGHAM Plaintiff AND
...provide all the immigration advice, albeit through a local migration company acting as an intermediary. That company is independent of him. [3] The essential issues are whether the company’s staff, unlicensed under New Zealand law, have performed immigration services unlawfully and whether Chinese law qualifies Mr Sun’s professional obligations. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Jianya Sun, also known as Bill Sun, is a licensed immigration adviser. He is resident in Shanghai. [5] In Jan...
...and other financial information. The request was rejected by the defendant principally upon the grounds that, in terms of s 32(1)(e) of the Act, the requested information was not reasonably necessary to support or substantiate any response to claims made for the purposes of the bargaining. [8] The Court found that the plaintiff‟s written request for the financial information it sought was “fatally flawed” 7 in that s 34(2)(c) of the Act provides that any such request must s...