12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 545 APPLICANT ED RESPONDENT NG The Tribunal orders: NG is to pay $11,000.00 to ED by the 23rd July 2024. Reasons 1. In the absence of NG and on the evidence before me I find ED purchased on the 27th January 2024 a second hand [vehicle] with some 154000km on the odometer from NG for $14,500, having seen the Ute advertised on Trademe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 609 APPLICANT IW RESPONDENT K Ltd (trading as CU) The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay IW $1,095.00 by 22 August 2024. Reasons: 1. IW claims a refund of $1,095.00 on a [phone], which he says is not of acceptable quality. 2. IW attended the teleconference hearing. CU did not attend. On 5 August, the CU NZ support team provided a [ov...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 656 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT T Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. BT is to be allowed reasonable access to collect the materials that belong to him that he returned to T Limited for him to collect during usual business hours for a period of 28 consecutive days from the date of this decision. If BT does not collect his goods w...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1481 APPLICANT ZC RESPONDENT NU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: NU Limited is to pay the sum of $182.50 to ZC on or before Thursday 16 August 2018. Reasons: 1. ZC had a new kilt specially made in an unusual tartan and sent from Scotland as an early birthday present for her daughter, who does highland danci...
...Director of H Ltd, H, submits that the overarching principle in contractual interpretation is determining the meaning that the document would convey to a reasonable person having all the background knowledge available to the parties when the contract was formed. The ordinary and natural meaning of the words are a powerful indicator of what the words mean. 7. H says that on 23 March 2022 he explained all clauses in the contract, including Part 7, to BP and EP, in person. He recommended...
...27 October 2009 the Privacy Commissioner informed AMEX that he had decided to take no further action and to discontinue the investigation of the complaint. [2.9] The present proceedings were filed on 24 September 2013. The amended statement of claim [3] By amended statement of claim dated 1 August 2014 Mr Hood alleges information privacy principles 2, 6 and 7 were breached by AMEX in three separate respects: [3.1] Collecting information about him from Veda Advantage (NZ) Ltd without...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 566 APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT CS The Tribunal orders: CS is to pay MQ $4,417.00 by 28 September 2024. Background 1. The adjournment order dated 22 May 2024 sets out the background to the claim. 2. The second hearing took place by phone on 16 July 2024. CS and MQ participated in the hearing. 3. I heard evidence from KC. KC cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 645 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. G Ltd is to pay $2,139.00 to SN on or before 4pm 13 November 2023. Reasons: 2. In April 2022 SN engaged G Ltd to supply plumbing services in her house for which she was invoiced for $3,017.63. SN said the shower tray was not levelled when it was installed and as a resu...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 708 APPLICANT IP APPLICANT OS RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is to pay the sum of $7466.38 to IP and OS by no later than 19 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In May 2021, IP and OS purchased a section from L Ltd. A Geotech report was arranged by L Ltd in June 2021 which revealed topsoil to a depth of 300mm in the borehole, wit...