Search Results

1. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 Procedural Order 8 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT LTD Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 8 Removal application by sixth respondent Dated 15 March 2022 2 Introduction [1] Wilton Joubert Limited, the sixth respondent, has applied to be removed as a party to this claim. Legal principles Removal [2] Section 112(1) of the Wea...

2. 2024 archive

   ...please see the main  What's new for legal aid lawyers  section. Urgent CPIP assignments over Christmas & New Year period Message from the Legal Services Commissioner Reminder – The PDLA holiday roster starts tomorrow nationwide. Legal Aid Applications for Repeat Criminal Parole proceedings Legal Aid Applications for Mental Health proceedings Legal aid payments to firms published Web2Txt Daily Reminder Pilot for PDLA - Auckland Region Cut-off date for invoices reminder Update on...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers >
   4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid

3. Forrest Drive [2011] NZWHT Auckland 29 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [3] Mr Foster and Ms Stuart were advised by a letter dated 2 March 2011 that their claim was not eligible. The application for review is dated 15 May 2011 an...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 65 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 13 KB]

   ...[2017] NZEmpC 65 [24 May 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 65 EMPC 377/2016 EMPC 277/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER an application for leave to extend time to file opposition to an application for further and better particulars AND IN THE MATTER an application for leave to extend time to file opposition to an application for security for costs...

5. ZG Ltd v C Ltd [2019] NZDT 1506 (12 September 2019) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...arrangement are contained in a Retailer Agreement signed by C Ltd. Clause 4.1b of the Agreement states, “The Retailer has verified the accuracy and truthfulness of the Customer’s … statements….” 2. In January 2018, C Ltd applied via ZG’s Online Application Centre to finance the sale of a car to WS. On 17 January 2018, ZG returned the result “Approved with no recourse. Based on information supplied, subject to due diligence and the terms of your dealer agreement” and subje...

6. GA v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 103 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 103 APPLICANT GA RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On 9-10 October 2023, GA contacted HY of R Ltd and engaged R Ltd to carry out a Weathertightness Report on a property at [address]. The inspection was required to satisfy GA’s bank. GA paid $920.00 to R Ltd for the ins...

7. EP v UK LTD & UKU LTD 2016 NZDT 893 (7 December 2016) [pdf, 137 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 983 BETWEEN EP APPLICANT AND UK LTD RESPONDENT AND UKU LTD SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 7 December 2016 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the first respondent, UK Ltd, is to pay the sum of $3530.82 directly to EP on or before 26 December 2016 and EP is declared to be not liable for the amount of $670.74. The claim against the...

8. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...make submissions and respond to any submissions from the other parties. [24] Any application for an order for the payment of costs or expenses under section 51(1)(g) should be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis for the claim. [25] The Registrar is requested to report on the extent to which Mr Hakaoro has complied with previous orders the Tribunal has imposed in respect of sanctions, and the steps she has taken to enforce the orders. Timetable [26] The...

9. Williams v Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc - Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc (2023) 295 Waiariki MB 97 (295 WAR 97) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...information needs to be kept private. The Incorporation have taken a cautious approach in not wanting to disclose too much information in case they are in breach of the Privacy Act 2020. Kōrero whānui Background [4] This matter concerns a request made by the applicant to view the share register of the Incorporation. The Incorporation refused this request, citing their obligations under the Privacy Act 2020. The applicant argues that the Incorporation’s refusal is in breach o...

10. Nicholson v Pene - Tauakira No. 2M No.4 (2023) 477 Aotea MB 140 (477 AOT 140) [pdf, 442 KB]

    ...certain? [60] What were the essential terms? [64] H3 house [71] H2 and G houses [73] How was ownership to be achieved? [75] Are the timeframes clear to fulfil the terms agreed? [79] Other clauses [81] Overall conclusion on the contractual claims [85] He taunakitanga kua puta e pā ana ki te whakaaweawe kino, te muremurenga, kia ea te whakakorenga o te whakatatū? – Was there evidence of undue influence and unconscionability, justifying the setting aside of the agreements...