12550 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 388 AQ LTDICANT TN RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: TN is to pay Q Ltd $3,081.78 on or before 24 June 2024. Reasons 1. TN asked Q Ltd to quote for a painting job. She rejected the first quote and agreed to a subsequent quote. When she received the invoice, she objected to paying the full amount, because she said that the
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 176 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay BL $11,765.42 on or before 23 June 2023. Reasons 1. BL entered in a contract with K Ltd to provide services as a [redacted] Consultant on 2 March 2022. 2. A dispute arose regarding the commission for the ‘N’ client. BL was advised that no...
...[2014] NZEmpC 176 [22 September 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 176 WRC 13/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to file statement of defence out of time BETWEEN ALLWAZE DESIGNS LIMITED Plaintiff AND ALICE CAWTHORNE Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by way of affidavits and memoranda filed 22 August...
...coherent and consistent evidential basis for the complaint. The appellant’s most specific element in his final position, was presented when he replied to the Registrar’s response to this appeal. He focused on an alleged failure of the Adviser to request a reconsideration of Immigration New Zealand’s decision to decline an application for a work visa. Immigration New Zealand’s letter contained a standard notification of the right to apply for reconsideration, and the criter...
...RESPONDENT DD The Tribunal orders: 1. SC Ltd has been joined as an applicant to these proceedings with the consent of the Director, LQ. 2. DD is to pay $3,874.07 to SC Ltd on or before 20 April 2021. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 3. SC Ltd was joined as an applicant to these proceedings with the consent of the Director, LQ, because the purchase was made by that company, as agent for LQ’s brother in law on Waiheke Island. 4. On 10 August 2020, LQ (as Director...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 573 APPLICANT PD RESPONDENT QB The Tribunal orders: 1. QB to pay PD $3,900.00 by 16 August 2024. Reasons 1. PD purchased a [motorbike] (bike) from QB for $5,200.00 after being the successful bidder in an [online] auction on the 7 December 2023. 2. PD claims that QB misrepresented the motorbike by describing it being in “imm...
...to the Court of Appeal. It strongly disputes that its use of the costs procedure is to prevent Ms Bowen from continuing with her proceedings. It says it is using the process as intended – to recoup its own costs which are in excess of those claimed. [15] BNZ says it succeeded entirely on the application dated 18 September 2020. It withdrew from the application its request that the communications be removed from the affidavit once the applicant had filed a new affidavit. It al...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 406 APPLICANT TC APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay TC and UD $768.70, on or by 14 October 2023. Reasons 2. On 16 and 17 March 2022, D Ltd installed a ducted heatpump in TC and UD’s home. The heatpump has a drain system to remove water which builds up through condensa...
...a few weeks. There were delays starting the job, and when the work started, he started to take days off with different excuses or he did not turn up to do anything. 7. Mr U gave excuses of not having enough funds for petrol to travel up to the applicants home to do work on the roof. In the end he stopped turning up for the job which was left unfinished. As it was winter, with the roof work incomplete leaking issues arose, causing damage to the property. 8. The applicants had an i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 234 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: BD is to pay $2000.00 to ET on or before 6 January 2023. Reasons 1. ET hired a car from BD on 26 December 2021 and two days into the hire, the car was hit while parked and unattended at the XX car park. The third party who caused the damage left a note with his name, contact...