Search Results

1. Nicholson v Pene - Tauakira No. 2M No.4 (2023) 477 Aotea MB 140 (477 AOT 140) [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...certain? [60] What were the essential terms? [64] H3 house [71] H2 and G houses [73] How was ownership to be achieved? [75] Are the timeframes clear to fulfil the terms agreed? [79] Other clauses [81] Overall conclusion on the contractual claims [85] He taunakitanga kua puta e pā ana ki te whakaaweawe kino, te muremurenga, kia ea te whakakorenga o te whakatatū? – Was there evidence of undue influence and unconscionability, justifying the setting aside of the agreements...

2. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Ltd (Stay) [2019] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Ms E Tait for plaintiff Mr G Brant for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 22 March 2019 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STAYING PROCEEDINGS1 [1] On 20 November 2018, the Tribunal dismissed an application to strike out Zelinda Doria’s proceedings under the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA). The defendants have filed judicial review proceedings in the High Court in respect of that decision. They have applied for Ms Doria’s pr...

3. BT v DC [2020] NZDT 1334 (10 August 2020) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1334 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT DC The Tribunal orders: 1. DC is to pay to BT the sum of $1,680.00 on or before 31 August 2020. Reasons 1. Ms T paid the sum of $3,580.00 to a friend, TD, for him to hold in an account on her behalf. 2. Unbeknownst to Ms T, the account to which she transferred the money was a joint a...

4. QD v KI [2024] NZDT 147 (17 April 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

5. Williams v Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc - Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc (2023) 295 Waiariki MB 97 (295 WAR 97) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...information needs to be kept private. The Incorporation have taken a cautious approach in not wanting to disclose too much information in case they are in breach of the Privacy Act 2020. Kōrero whānui Background [4] This matter concerns a request made by the applicant to view the share register of the Incorporation. The Incorporation refused this request, citing their obligations under the Privacy Act 2020. The applicant argues that the Incorporation’s refusal is in breach o...

6. BW v EO [2023] NZDT 20 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 20 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT EO The Tribunal orders: EO is to pay BW $1,139.30 on or before 23 March 2023. Reasons 1. On 11 June 2022, EO attended a party at BW’s house. After the group at the party had been drinking for a few hours, a fight occurred and EO kicked in a pane of glass on the bottom of BW’s front door...

7. FT v SV [2018] NZDT 1516 (19 December 2018) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...1. SV is to pay the sum of $3,000.00 to FT on or before Monday 28 January 2019. 2. Within two weeks of receiving payment, FT is to return the car to SV. Reasons: 1. On 21 August 2018, FT purchased a Honda Stream car from SV for $3,000.00. He claims that SV told him there was nothing wrong with the car, but that he discovered numerous issues with the car immediately after purchase, such as a faulty speedometer, worn shock absorbers, illegally modified engine and transmission issues....

8. B Ltd v JG & WG [2023] NZDT 770 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 770 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT JG SECOND RESPONDENT WG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 15 June 2017, B Ltd loaned $4,000.00 to JG and WG (the debtors) for the purpose of car repairs, to be paid by instalments of $360.00 per month, at an annual interest rate of 28.95% (loan number). On 15 De...

9. ZG v DD Ltd & GT [2023] NZDT 119 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 118 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 119 APPLICANT ZG RESPONDENT DD Limited SECOND RESPONDENT GT The Tribunal orders: 1. GT is to pay ZG a total of $12,340.00 on or before Friday 21 July 2023. 2. While the claim against DD Limited is dismissed, it undertook to pay ZG $1000.00. So, I order DD Limited to pay ZG the total sum of $1000.00 on or before Friday 21...

10. XT Ltd v N [2017] NZDT 1458 (6 March 2017) [pdf, 181 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1458 APPLICANT XT Limited RESPONDENT NN SECOND RESPONDENT B Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER JB Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: NN is to pay the sum of $4,923.07 to JB Limited on or before Monday 20 March 2017. Reasons: 1. On 7 August 2015, a very windy day, Ms N was get...