Search Results

1. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation (Backdated Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 117 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...medical information. The Corporation sought further information from Mr Jones but did not receive any. [14] On 20 November 2017, the Corporation wrote to Mr Jones declining his application for weekly compensation. The Corporation noted that, if the requested information was provided, then the Corporation might be able to reassess backdated weekly compensation. [15] On 1 December 2017, Dr Hefford wrote to the Corporation providing medical information regarding Mr Jones’ treatmen...

2. T Ltd v EO [2024] NZDT 814 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...dated 27 and 29 June 2024 affirmed the contract. 10. EO disputes that he had engaged T Ltd. He says that his initial communication was exploratory in nature and that T Ltd were never properly authorised to act on his behalf. 11. A contract is formed when there is an agreement between the parties, or where there is a meeting of the minds between them. Often this relies on an offer, and acceptance of that offer. There must also be certainty about the terms that have been agreed to.

3. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.9 September 2023 [pdf, 927 KB]

   ...Operational Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully ex...

4. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v2.0 October 2023 [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes...

5. Argyle v Macdee McLennan Construction Ltd & Ors [2012] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...Proffitt, the assessor and Thomas Wutzler, the claimants’ expert. Some defects were also mentioned in Mr Prouse’s report referred to by the parties. Roof and drip edge [25] There was a failure to turn down the ends of the metal roof to form a drip edge (exacerbated by low pitch) and a failure to form a drip edge to the barge flashing over the kitchen roof. There was a lack of cover to the flashings on the north east and south west elevations. The building underlay had...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 112  A Labour Inspector v Dao (No6) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...legal fees. (d) The respondents may require the release of further funds and/or payments to be made from currently frozen bank accounts. Accordingly, the Labour Inspector will provide advice on the process to be followed for making such requests and will then facilitate appropriate requests promptly. [27] A review hearing will be held, if necessary, at 10 am on Wednesday 9 July 2025. The following timetable applies for that hearing: (a) The applicant is to file a memor...

7. LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ (16 November 2018) [pdf, 466 KB]

   ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Enforcement of loans ........................................................................................................................... 7 Witnessing signed unprepared (blank) Authority and Instruction (A&I) forms ..................................... 7 Standards Committee decision ....................................................................

8. [2019] NZLVT 002 The Trustees of the Jiong Swee Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...are still Plan breaches. She notes also that the Regional Council proposed that potentially interested parties be given an opportunity to join and that NRC subsequently instructed an air quality expert. [26] Further, Ms de Silva confirms that NRC formed the view at the second mediation that the abatement notice was defective and subsequently, in light of that position and legal advice, they withdrew the abatement notice. She notes that the eventual wording adopted for the undertakin...

9. TQ v OD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1426 (16 March 2021) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...reasonable view of the bricks they were not the grey colour scheme described as ‘grey blend.’ 9. Accordingly, I find that OD Ltd is to pay TQ $3,000.00. Referee: A Baker Date: 16th March 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. N Ltd v B Ltd, SL, & I Ltd [2022] NZDT 236 (7 July 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

    ...that the invoice for the clean-up and contamination testing fee is reasonable. Conclusion 22. For the reasons above, SL must pay N LTD, $11,615.00. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 7 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...