Search Results

1. DC v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 539 (3 October 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...there. His was the phone handed to the man at 8.20pm. 4. DC claims $1200 from K Ltd, the owner of the K Ltd represented by KD, comprising: • $280, the sum he paid for his phone a few months earlier; and • $920 for stress and the loss of information etc on the phone. 5. The issue to be decided in the first instance is whether K Ltd took possession of the phone into its care. Did K Ltd take the phone into its possession under a bailment relationship? 6. A bailment is...

2. KC & UJ v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 29 (23 January 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...for paint for the deck plus $50 labour and $25 for the outside light cover. A total $125.00 is ordered to be paid by X Ltd for the defects that were established. Referee Perfect Date: 23 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. CF v XQ Ltd [2023] NZDT 123 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...[2023] NZDT 123 APPLICANT CF RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: XQ Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,239.65 to CF on or before Friday 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2022, CF purchased a [computer] via [online platform] and paid $1,220.00 by bank transfer to an account in the name of XQ Ltd. He was promised that a shipping number would be released in two to three business days, but this did not happen. Six days later, XQ Ltd said that there was an attack...

4. KS & QS v ZA [2023] NZDT 421 (25 August 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...surveyor mark out the boundaries of the properties so that any new fence would be built on the boundary line. 3. KS and QS engaged a friend of theirs who was a surveyor to survey the boundary ‘off the record’. However, as this was the case, no formal report was produced and when ZA asked for one, KS and QS were unable to provide it. Being unsure that the pegs located by KS and QS friend were indeed the correct boundary markers, ZA did not agree to the building of the new fence.

5. QQ & TO v FN [2024] NZDT 697 (29 November 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...reasons I find the advertisement does not misrepresent the bracelet and I must dismiss this claim. 8. I am not required to consider the remaining issue. Referee: C Murphy Date: 29 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

6. QH Ltd v BD [2024] NZDT 283 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...Therefore, this suggests that the cheaper repair option has not been totally satisfactory. BD is lucky that QH Ltd did not insist on a full replacement. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 26 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. [2019] NZEmpC 57 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...documents, together with compiling an index and 5 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [2017] NZEmpC 10 at [32]. providing copies. He also said that Mr Gildenhuys had to respond to a request from Cornish Trucks regarding further documentation. In his original claim, Mr Gildenhuys had sought a further day for preparation of the common bundle but concedes that two days in total, covering both the list of documents on dis...

8. Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act.4 Whether s 27(3) at issue 9. Clause 24(3) of the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol under the Bill. 10. This clause may be seen to raise the issue of compliance with s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, namely the right to bring ci...

9. MK v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 293 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...safely pack up and arrange for the return all the curtains purchased from S Ltd to them, with shipping of the boxes with the curtains to be paid for by S Ltd. Referee: C Price Date: 01 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

    ...application under s 50J of the Act, which occurred on 22 September 2016. [9] Finally, the objection challenged disclosure of communication to or from Foodstuffs as not relevant. The challenges to the objections [10] By the time the parties requested this dispute be resolved on the papers the outstanding issues had narrowed, so they did not involve any argument about documents being subject to legal professional privilege or communication to or from Foodstuffs. The remaining iss...