Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12550 items matching your search terms

  1. AF v FG & TI [2024] NZDT 347 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 347 APPLICANT AF RESPONDENT FG SECOND RESPONDENT TI The Tribunal orders: 1. AF is to pay FG and TI $3,314.08 on or before 31 May 2024. 2. AF is the owner of and is entitled to possession of [the dog]. 3. FG and TI are to make [the dog] available to be collected by AF or her nominee no later than three working days af...

  2. [2011] NZEmpC 20 Miller v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...of the evidence of a witness who was very unwell and the arrangements that were made for that evidence to be taken on Tuesday 5 October 2010. That witness sadly passed away on 16 September, but in the plaintiff’s affidavit in support of the application for further and better discovery, sworn on 12 August 2010, Mr Miller annexed an affidavit of that person, Mr Young, which was sworn on 29 May 2008. [2] Mr Rooney, counsel for the defendant, has indicated that objection will be...

  3. Le’Long v Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 303 KB]

    ...[1] Ms Le’Long provided foster care for a child placed in her care by Oranga Tamariki. However, in May 2018, Oranga Tamariki removed the child from Ms Le’Long’s care. [2] Aggrieved by that decision, Ms Le’Long made an information privacy request to Oranga Tamariki under the Privacy Act 19932 (‘the Act’). [3] Oranga Tamariki provided Ms Le’Long with some of her personal information but refused to provide her with access to other information that it held. Ms Le’Long cl...

  4. EF v G Ltd NZDT [2021] 1530 (24 February 2021) [pdf, 229 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1530 APPLICANT / COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT EF RESPONDENT / COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. EF is not liable to G Ltd for the sum of $1,846.39. 2. The counterclaim by G Ltd dismissed. Reasons: 1. EF entered a contract with G Ltd for completion of an online course to become a personal...

  5. W Ltd v Q & G Ltd and KJ Ltd [2019] NZDT 1495 (28 February 2019) [pdf, 94 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1495 APPLICANT W Ltd RESPONDENT Q & G Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER KJ Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: Q & G Ltd is to pay the sum of $6,525.24 to W Ltd on or before Thursday 14 March 2019. Reasons: 1. On 25 October 2016, an employee of Q & G Ltd driving a milk delivery truck reversed i...

  6. UH v KM Ltd [2023] NZDT 111 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 111 APPLICANT UH RESPONDENT KM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In August 2022, UH bought a 2002 [automatic car] from KM Ltd for $45,000.00. He uplifted it from [Suburb] a few weeks later and noticed an issue with the gearbox transmission. On 20 September 2022, he raised this and some other issue...

  7. HD Ltd v DX [2023] NZDT 781 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 781 APPLICANT HD Ltd RESPONDENT DX The Tribunal orders: DX t/a X Ltd is to pay $4,191.18 to HD Ltd on or before 6 December 2023. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. DX engaged HD Ltd (HD Ltd) to root-rake an area of land part of which was cut-over forestry and the other part covered with scrub/vegetation. The work was carri...

  8. KT v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 382 (14 June 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 382 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Around March/April 2023 KT purchased a 2021 [vehicle] for $30,500.00 from P Ltd. KT now wishes to return the vehicle and seeks a refund of $30,000.00 being the maximum jurisdiction of the Tribunal as he says he was not advised it is a type of...

  9. Gough-Pataua 4B (2011) 19 Taitokerau MB 1 (19 TTK 1) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...September 2007 14 December 2010 7 March 2011 (Heard at Whangarei) Court: Judge A D Spencer Judge D J Ambler Judgment: 12 April 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGES A D SPENCER AND D J AMBLER Introduction [1] This judgment concerns five applications for occupation orders under s 328 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (―the Act‖). Barry Gough has applied for a 1.2 acre area. Huia Connor and three of her children, Isabella Mehana, Kenneth Connor and Ngaire Cooper...

  10. RT v Earthquake Commission & IAG New Zealand Ltd [2023] CEIT 003 [pdf, 289 KB]

    IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-003-2023 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN RT Applicant AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (IAG) First Respondent AND TOKA TU AKE (EQC) Second Respondent Date: 5 October 2023 ___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF S M A MCCORMACK On th...