12870 items matching your search terms
...179/2010 and 180/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN MR IP of Auckland Applicant AND AND SI Respondent (LCRO 179/10) of Auckland SH Respondent (LCRO 180/10) of Auckland DECISION The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed....
...2015 Appearances: C Patterson and A Halloran, counsel for plaintiff C Stewart and G Tanner, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 August 2015 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] In a judgment dated 16 June 2015 the claims by the plaintiff (Hally) for further injunction, declarations and damages and the counter-claim by the defendant (Mr Powell) for damages and penalty were dismissed. 1 That judgment had been preceded by judgments of the Court dealin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 435 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT KE The Tribunal orders: KE is to pay M Ltd the sum of $3,611.00 on or before 29 September 2023. Reasons: 1. KE asked M Ltd to come to his property and provide a quote to carry a variety of exterior cleaning tasks. 2. On 4 May 2023 M Ltd came to the property, carried out an inspection...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2017] NZDT 1168 BETWEEN GP APPLICANT AND SKS Ltd RESPONDENT KS SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 10 February 2017 Referee: Referee: Murphy ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that GP is to pay SKS Ltd $1321.58 on or before 2 March 2017. Facts [1] SKS Ltd installed a security system at Mr GP’s residence. Mr GP paid an installation fee and signed a three year agreement for th...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...Counsel were subsequently obtained. [7] On 19 August 2014, a telephone conference was held with counsel for the applicant (Mr Anthony Sinclair) and counsel for the respondent trustees (Mr Webb). A timetable, for the filing of any Statement of Claim or further particulars, a statement of defence and evidence for both parties, was agreed to. During the conference, Mr Sinclair advised that the applicant filed the current application before the Court on behalf of David Sinclair who is an...
...SECOND APPLICANT AND ZYZ, ZYY and ZYX as Trustees RESPONDENTS Date of Order: 8 February 2013 Referee: Referee A Davidson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicants’ claim is dismissed. Facts [1] The parties own neighbouring properties in [a place]. The Applicants wished to replace the fence between the properties and served a notice on the Respondents under the Fencing Act 1978, s...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 31 EMPC 273/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for discovery against a non- party BETWEEN ZARA’S TURKISH LIMITED Plaintiff AND GÜLER KOCATÜRK Defendant EMPC 158/2018 AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to a determination of the...
...make submissions and respond to any submissions from the other parties. [24] Any application for an order for the payment of costs or expenses under section 51(1)(g) should be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis for the claim. [25] The Registrar is requested to report on the extent to which Mr Hakaoro has complied with previous orders the Tribunal has imposed in respect of sanctions, and the steps she has taken to enforce the orders. Timetable [26] The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 291 APPLICANT AND COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT USM RESPONDENT AND COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders and declares: 1. USM is to pay Q Ltd $95.00 by 11 October 2022. 2. USM is not liable to pay Q Ltd $321.71. 3. Q Ltd’s claim for a balance of $330.35 is dismissed. Reasons: 1. USM seeks a declarat...