Search Results

1. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 Procedural Order 8 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT LTD Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 8 Removal application by sixth respondent Dated 15 March 2022 2 Introduction [1] Wilton Joubert Limited, the sixth respondent, has applied to be removed as a party to this claim. Legal principles Removal [2] Section 112(1) of the Wea...

2. Forrest Drive [2011] NZWHT Auckland 29 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [3] Mr Foster and Ms Stuart were advised by a letter dated 2 March 2011 that their claim was not eligible. The application for review is dated 15 May 2011 an...

3. LCRO 136/2023 QT v MZ (8 January 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...referring VN to ss 38 and 23 of the Trusts Act 2019. [14] At 6.18pm that day, VN sent the respondent another email, copied to the same recipients, in which he relevantly: (a) referred to “your client’s consistent threats and insistent false claims”; (b) stated that no agreement had been made at the meeting; (c) referred to TL’s responsibilities as a trustee; (d) referred to the respondent’s responsibilities under a “Code of Practice”. (e) asserted that the respondent...

4. EMPC Affidavit of document service [docx, 99 KB]

   ...……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. (List each document served, eg, statement of claim, application and affidavit in support). If a copy of a served document is not attached to the affidavit, the description of the document— (a)
must be sufficient to...

5. DX & SX v TZ [2021] NZDT 1687 (27 May 2021) [pdf, 191 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1687 APPLICANT DX APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT TZ The Tribunal orders: TZ is to pay DX and SX $1,430.59 on or before Friday 18 June 2021. Reasons: 1. DX & SX share a property boundary with TZ. DX & SX returned to their home after work on 4 December 2020 to find TZ had cut down a substa

6. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 75 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant has appealed against a review decision dated 7 October 2021. In this decision, the reviewer concluded that the appellant’s review application of 6 May 2021 was not in respect of a reviewable decision. The reviewer therefore dismissed the application for want of jurisdiction. Background [2] The appellant has cover for a physical injury and post-traumatic stress d...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 119 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 291 KB]

   ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 119 EMPC 335/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs relating to application for an order to preserve evidence BETWEEN MELISSA BOWEN Plaintiff AND BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Defendant EMPC 261/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for spe...

8. Hotene - Estate of Paratene Mita Hotene [2018] Chief Judge's MB 277 (2018 CJ 277) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...seeks to amend succession orders dated 1 September 1998 at 90 Whakatāne MB 405-407 and 28 January 2000 at 92 Whakatāne MB 250-251 relating to Paratene Mita Hotene (“the deceased”) who is the great uncle of the applicant. [2] Both orders are claimed by the applicant to be incorrect because of a mistake, error or omission in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court, namely, the misidentification of two of the four children of Kereopa Hotene who was the brother of t...

9. Hooker v Director-General of the Department of Conservation (2012) 38 Taitokerau MB 219 (38 TTK 219) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 38 Taitokerau MB 219 (38 TTK 219) A20050019948 UNDER Section 18(1)(c) Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waipoua 2B2B1B BETWEEN GARRY HOOKER Applicant AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Respondent Hearing: 32 Taitokerau MB 271, 21 November 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Mr R Ferguson for the Applicant Mr G Hulbert for the Department...

10. [2008] NZEmpC WC 16/08 Wesley Community Action Trust v Dickson and anor [pdf, 25 KB]

    ...s178 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (“the Act”) to remove Mr Dickson’s proceedings to this Court for hearing at first instance. [2] At about 5.30 pm yesterday the plaintiff, Wesley Community Action Trust (“the Trust”), requested the Court to consider urgently this issue on the basis of copies of proceedings filed with the Authority, exchanges of correspondence between the parties, and a covering letter to the Court. Mr Cullen, counsel for the plaintiff,...