12550 items matching your search terms
...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140012567 CJ 2014/42 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Great Barrier Island (all the islands and rock outcrops in the environs of Aotea) ERANA HEMOATA BAYNE Applicant Judgment: 22 August 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 765 Introduction [1] This application filed b...
...105/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee Number 2 BETWEEN AQ of Auckland Applicant AND ZI of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In July 2008, the firm of AAM (AAM) was instructed by the Applicant on...
...assistance for her accommodation costs believing the payments to be correct”. [4] A further note was made that neither the appellant or her advocate “have a copy of such a letter with the written decision of the Benefits Review Committee despite a request for this”. [5] On 23 February 2015 the appellant’s advocate was asked for an explanation as to why the time for filing the appeal should be extended. No response was received to this communication or further communications fr...
...OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 197/2022 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for leave to intervene BETWEEN LYN SOAPI First Plaintiff AND DANNY LAU Second Plaintiff AND MARY LAU Third Plaintiff AND...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1582 APPLICANT in the claim JT RESPONDENT in the claim SN APPLICANT in the counterclaim BI INSURER of the APPLICANT' in the claim JB Ltd The Tribunal orders: SN is to pay $5,806.50 to JB Limited by 7 August 2021 or by payments if JB Limited agrees. Background 1. On 21 February 202...
...significantly and may have also impacted upon the discovery exercise. However, it is only because of the way in which the legislature has approached the matter in the Employment Relations Act 2000 that litigation involving both contractual and tortious claims against the same ex-employees and the company they may have formed are not heard in the same court. Some of the difficulties that are presented by the parallel proceedings in this case would have been avoided if they all coul...
...WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 44 [14 March 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 44 WRC 5/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for disclosure of documents by a non-party BETWEEN EMMA YUEN SEE FOX Plaintiff AND HEREWORTH SCHOOL TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: On documents filed on 10 March 2014 Appearances: B Sc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1482 APPLICANT IG C/- XG Trust APPLICANT JX C/- XG Trust APPLICANT KX C/- XG Trust RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal hereby orders: IG, JX and KX as trustees of the XG Trust are to pay the sum of $15,000.00 to SI on or before Monday 10 September 2018. Reasons: 1. The trustees of the
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 111 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT SG Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. SG Ltd is to pay NN $4,643.99 on or before 6 March 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In early October 2023, NN’s [ute] (‘the ute’) was taken to SG Ltd with a suspected blown head cylinder. NN was informed the repair would cost...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 387 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT BN SECOND RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: 1. NN is to pay SM $500.00 on or before 26 June 2024. 2. The claim against BN is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SM purchased a vehicle from NN, whose mother, BN, was selling it on her behalf. 2. At the time of advertising the car it did not have a war...