Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11423 items matching your search terms

  1. [2013] NZEmpC 58 O’Hagan v Waitomo Adventures Ltd [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...Court. In Lee v Minor Developments Ltd 8 Judge Shaw observed that: 6 HCR 14.5(1). 7 At [51]. 8 AC 21/09, 24 April 2009. [16] In Simpson v BB’s New Zealand Ltd the High Court agreed that a request for costs of a judicial settlement conference was novel. It noted that such conferences are not included in the schedule of costs in the High Court Rules and held that this was a deliberate policy to encourage parties to attend and...

  2. Form-26_Criminal-Fixed-H-I.pdf [pdf, 188 KB]

    Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 26 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed...

  3. [2008] NZEmpC AC 11/08 Shakes & Anor v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

    ...also of the applicable collective agreement. Although Mr McIlraith for the company emphasised the Authority’s finding on this issue at paragraph 45 of its determination that a company manager “…subsequently sent an email to each applicant requesting (sic) them to submit an annual leave request.” I do not think this can be said surely to be a finding that Messrs Shakes and Helyar agreed to the day being treated as annual or other leave. The sending of those e- mails (that I...

  4. Manuel v Carroll - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 5004 Part Waimarama 3A1A1 (2020) 83 Takitimu MB 41(83 TKT 41) [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...October 2002 and October 2017, Mr Carroll occupied the land under a bare licence on the condition that he mow the lawns, pay the rates, and generally keep the property tidy and in good order. On 28 April 2017, Ms Manuel revoked that licence and requested that Mr Carroll vacate the land by 30 August 2017. A further notice was then issued extending the final termination date to October 2017. Mr Carroll ceased paying rates at that time and, contrary to the requests of the owners, has...

  5. Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited v Te Rūnanga nui o te Aupōuri - application under s 182(4) Māori Fisheries Act 2004 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 1 (102 TTK 1) [pdf, 314 KB]

    ...relevant. Reliance is placed on an affidavit of Mr Haami Piripi filed in support. Mr Piripi is the current Chair of Te Rūnanga o Te Rarawa. Mr Piripi refers to a mana paradigm developed by Maori Marsden as a benchmark. That paradigm identifies three forms of mana. Mana tupuna (or atua) derived through ancestry and defined by genealogical relationships. Mana tangata, an expression of the inherited attributes of the individual and mana whenua/moana the ability to make decisions about...

  6. Adoption Action Inc v Attorney-General [2016] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 371 KB]

    ...whether a meaning consistent or less inconsistent with the right can be found [254] REMEDY [257] Crown submissions on remedy [260] Discussion – the comity point [262] The law reform point [267] The “good practice” point [270] The Crown request for a further remedies hearing [272] DECLARATION [277] COSTS [280] 5 INTRODUCTION [1] The Adoption Act 1955 came into force on 27 October 1955, some 61 years ago. But as one informed commentator has pointed out, the o...

  7. Fehling v Appleby (Strike-Out Application) [2013] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 54 KB]

    ...Fehling was told that the reason was that complaints had been made to the Caretaker that he (Mr Fehling) had been using the pool, showers and toilets at the School. Mr Fehling strongly denies these allegations. By way of a request for personal information under the Privacy Act 1993, Mr Fehling sought the names of the individuals who had made the complaints. The School declined to provide that information, relying on s 27(1)(d) (disclosure of the information would likely endanger the sa...

  8. IJ v K U Ltd [2020] NZDT 1549 (10 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...inspection is strong evidence the system was not legally compliant. Further, IJ was required to install an RPZ valve. K & U Ltd contracted with IJ to provide a legally compliant working system and it was not. Furthermore, K & U Ltd employees informed IJ on many occasions that the RPZ valve requirement was just an error in the paperwork and it was not. For these reasons I find K & U Ltd has not completed the work they contracted to complete with reasonable skill and care. I also...

  9. BM v OZ Ors [2024] NZDT 109 (5 February 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...and inconvenience. 24. So I order OZ and ZB Ltd jointly and severally to pay BM the total sum of $1,999.99. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 5 February 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 6 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

  10. NQ v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 651 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...reasons above, C Limited must pay NQ $12,038.30, being $7,638.30 (the E Ltd invoice) plus $4,400.00 (part of the secured rental). Page 5 of 6 Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 21 August 2024 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...