12941 items matching your search terms
1 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 22 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6853: ROGER GEORGE PROCTER, PAULINE JANICE PROCTER AND GEOFFREY LEONARD PROCTER – 31 The Crowsnest, Whitby, Porirua ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Roger, Pauline and Geoffrey Procter are the owners of a property a...
...IN THE MATTER of Applications by Tamatea Pareka Clark in respect of Parltata B1 Block fi rst for an occupation order under Section 328 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 and secondly for an injunction to prevent removal of a bach Mr Matenga for the Applicant Mr Tame Pokaia on behalf of the Trustees Application has been made by Tamatea Pareka Clark for an occupation order over a site on Paritata 91 Block. It was accompanied by a further application under Section 19(1 )(b)/93 for an inj...
...14 February 2019 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The adviser, Mr Dua, represented Ms DJ in respect of unsuccessful graduate work and visitor visas applications. The complainant says she was misled by Mr Dua, who advised her she could obtain a graduate experience work visa based on her employment in a takeaway shop. According to her, when that application failed he incompetently dealt...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 315 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay $285.00 to KD on or before 13 June 2024. Reasons 1. In October 2023 KD booked, via [booking website], 6 nights accommodation at [accommodation] in [Town], operated by D Ltd, changing the booking to 5 nights the next day. The total cost of the stay was to be...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
LFJ-447097-3-1169-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ENV-2018-AKL-000078 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) A N D IN THE MATTER of direct referral of an application for resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant A N D AUCKLAND COUNCIL Re...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...December 2016 at which counsel for the respondents sought more time to take instructions and consider the issues arising from the application. [4] A further judicial telephone conference was scheduled for 20 January 2017, but postponed at the request of the Applicants to 3 February 2017. During that conference, an issue was raised about the meaning of the definition of "intensive farming" in the Auckland Unitary Plan. There was a suggestion that the issue might be addresse...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1695 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT BJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: BJ Ltd is to pay BC $2962.00 on or before Monday 27 December 2021 Reasons: 1. On 19 February 2021, BC entered into a contract with BJ Ltd for an [Insurance policy]. Over the period 11-19 March 2021 she went on holiday, leaving her Labrador dog and a fr...
...written contract read "light polish and seal only (no aggregate showing)". This was to achieve a smooth cream finish. The floor that actually resulted from the build was grey in colour with a significant amount of aggregate showing. 3. ST claims damages of $15,196.35, being the cost to tile the floor with concrete-look tiles, in order to achieve closer to the smooth cream finish she had specified. 4. The issues to determine are: • Was the building work carried out in...