Search Results

1. S v L [2017] NZIACDT 3 (4 April 2017) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...adviser met to discuss the applicant’s immigration circumstances. At the time, the applicant held a work visa issued under the partnership category which was due to expire on 30 August 2014. [7.2] The adviser was instructed to prepare a work visa application, and complete the appropriate formalities. The Registrar says that at a meeting on 5 August 2014 there was a discussion concerning the applicant not having been declared as a partner on the complainant’s residence visa app...

2. JA & JA Bradley Family Trust v Auckland City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 37 [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...BOLER Fifth Respondent AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (for and on behalf of the Assets and Liabilities of the Building Industry Authority) (REMOVED) Sixth Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: S Pezaro 18 November 2010 APPLICATION FOR COSTS [1] Sky Network Television Limited (Sky), the third respondent (now removed), seeks an award of costs against the claimants on the basis that the claim against Sky lacked substantial merit. In determining this ap...

3. BC & others v QK [2023] NZDT 137 (5 June 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 137 APPLICANT BC APPLICANT KC APPLICANT SS APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT QK The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. After seeing an advertisement for a caravan for sale on social media SS engaged with QK and after viewing the caravan she purchased it. SS alleges QK misrepresented th...

4. FA & FAA v TZ & TZZ [2017] NZDT 1048 (18 July 2017) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...regular price of $75 per month. FA stopped paying his monthly fees in October 2016, and FAA stopped paying in November 2016. [2] Since payments stopped, TZ1 has invoiced a total of $352.00 to FAA and $376 to FA in membership fees and late fees. The applicants now seek a declaration that they are not liable to pay TZ1 the invoiced sums. Issues (a) What are the terms of the contracts regarding cancellation? (b) Was TZ1 entitled to suspend access to the gym? (c) What amount, if any...

5. Ngalu v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 58 (30 April 2014) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 30 April 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The complainant engaged the adviser to assist with a request for a visa; she was in New Zealand without a current visa. [2] The grounds of complaint are uncomplicated. The adviser submitted the request and Immigration New Zealand declined the request. The adviser was aware of that. The complaint...

6. KN v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 371 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...that it is most likely that KN’s loss is therefore actually more likely to be in the order of $300.00 and this is the amount I find that D Ltd is liable to pay KN. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 23 May 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. BD and NQ v R Co Ltd [2021] NZDT 1354 (12 February 2021) [pdf, 169 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1354 APPLICANT BD and NQ RESPONDENT R & Co Limited The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: R & Co. Ltd is to pay the sum of $393.00 directly to NQ on or before 5 March 2021. Reasons 1. BD (as a director) and NQ engaged R & Co Ltd (‘RCL’) in May 2020 to provide conveyancing service...

8. X Ltd v II [2021] NZDT 1539 (14 May 2021) [pdf, 169 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1539 APPLICANT X Limited (formerly Q Limited) RESPONDENT II SECOND RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: II and BI are liable to pay $7,536.78 to X Limited in respect of the claim. X Limited is liable to pay $4,492.88 to II and BI in respect of the counter claim. After the amount of $4,492.88 payable by X Limited...

9. Mullane v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 417 KB]

   ...of a P, V, I or O licence endorsement for the period of the term of the endorsement as the Director may consider necessary. The Memorandum of Understanding between the Police and the NZTA [31] The Police Vetting Service does not process vetting requests directly from individuals, with the exception of overseas visa requests. Instead, the Vetting Service has agreements with organisations known as “approved agencies”. The NZTA is one of these approved agencies. [32] In 2013 the...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 85 Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd v Total Property Services (Canterbury) Ltd [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...TOTAL PROPERTY SERVICES (CANTERBURY) LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 85 [19 May 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 85 EMPC 423/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CREST COMMERCIAL CLEANING LIMITED Applicant AND TOTAL PROPERTY SERVICES (CANTERBURY) LIMI...