Search Results

1. BQ v EI [2024] NZDT 427 (20 April 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...recover the $4,279.80 spent on repairing the head gasket. The buyer did not have evidence of other costs to hand, so the sum awarded is $4,279.80. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. BT v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 574 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...hear that the $14,000.00 plus $1000.00 payment is still available and agreed to receive that – that has been recorded as a settlement agreement of the Tribunal. Referee Perfect Date: 30 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. NQ v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 598 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...brake-checking. Given that this practice is inherently dangerous and that it followed a tight lane change, I find that NQ is fully liable for causing the collision. Referee Perfect Date: 9 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. SU v KU [2024] NZDT 596 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...consider. 6. KU says that there has never been any discussion of the table being returned to SU, that he has been allowed to use it since he went flatting in September 2017 and that he was given the table by his parents in April 2022. SU’s former wife and KU’s mother, CU stated in a text message sent on 6 June 2023 that the table was gifted to KU in April 2022 upon her separation with SU. 7. As the applicant, SU is required to prove his case on the balance of probabilities....

5. Form-26a_Criminal-Fixed-H-I.pdf [pdf, 191 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 26a Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) complet...

6. Form-23a_Criminal-Fixed-A-C.pdf [pdf, 211 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 23a Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A-C Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus...

7. Form-26a_Criminal-Fixed-H-I-v2.pdf [pdf, 191 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 26a Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) complet...

8. McKeogh v Attorney-General (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2017] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...conference. Be that as it may, given the Tribunal’s current workload it is unlikely that a teleconference can be arranged inside the next two months. De facto, the Attorney-General is therefore likely (but not guaranteed) to have the two months requested. ORDERS [21] The following orders are made: [21.1] The application by the Attorney-General for an order under s 92D (that the complaint by the plaintiffs be referred back to the Human Rights Commission) is declined. [21.2] The...

9. Judge v Care Park New Zealand Limited [2023] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...vehicle that had over 20” parking tickets. Ms Threadgold asked Ms Pepere for the registration number, make and model of the vehicle and indicated Wintec would try and identify the staff member. Ms Pepere did not provide this additional information requested. [5] On 18 February 2016 Ms Threadgold emailed Ms Pepere granting permission to clamp the vehicle after 25 February 2016. Ms Threadgold also indicated that Wintec had located the owner of the vehicle and that the vehicle owner sa...

10. IN Ltd v NB [2022] NZDT 74 (22 February 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...made honestly. [21] Thus, the claim is dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Referee: C Hawes Date: 22 February 2022 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...