12899 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 315 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay $285.00 to KD on or before 13 June 2024. Reasons 1. In October 2023 KD booked, via [booking website], 6 nights accommodation at [accommodation] in [Town], operated by D Ltd, changing the booking to 5 nights the next day. The total cost of the stay was to be...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1695 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT BJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: BJ Ltd is to pay BC $2962.00 on or before Monday 27 December 2021 Reasons: 1. On 19 February 2021, BC entered into a contract with BJ Ltd for an [Insurance policy]. Over the period 11-19 March 2021 she went on holiday, leaving her Labrador dog and a fr...
...written contract read "light polish and seal only (no aggregate showing)". This was to achieve a smooth cream finish. The floor that actually resulted from the build was grey in colour with a significant amount of aggregate showing. 3. ST claims damages of $15,196.35, being the cost to tile the floor with concrete-look tiles, in order to achieve closer to the smooth cream finish she had specified. 4. The issues to determine are: • Was the building work carried out in...
...IN THE MATTER of Applications by Tamatea Pareka Clark in respect of Parltata B1 Block fi rst for an occupation order under Section 328 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 and secondly for an injunction to prevent removal of a bach Mr Matenga for the Applicant Mr Tame Pokaia on behalf of the Trustees Application has been made by Tamatea Pareka Clark for an occupation order over a site on Paritata 91 Block. It was accompanied by a further application under Section 19(1 )(b)/93 for an inj...
...Introduction [1] This matter arises out of an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 October 2022. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s 13 January 2022 decision declining cover in relation to Mr Ratima’s claim that he suffered treatment injury by reason of being incorrectly diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2010. [2] On 20 October 2022, Mr Ratima filed a Notice of Appeal against the Reviewer’s decision of 18 October 2022, with an acc...
...14 February 2019 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The adviser, Mr Dua, represented Ms DJ in respect of unsuccessful graduate work and visitor visas applications. The complainant says she was misled by Mr Dua, who advised her she could obtain a graduate experience work visa based on her employment in a takeaway shop. According to her, when that application failed he incompetently dealt...
LFJ-447097-3-1169-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ENV-2018-AKL-000078 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) A N D IN THE MATTER of direct referral of an application for resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant A N D AUCKLAND COUNCIL Re...
...BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Wellington on 7 & 9 November 2012 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr J Miller for appellant Mr P McBride for respondent DECISION Introduction [1] The appeal is brought as a form of class or representative action under the aegis of the named appellant and 20 other appellants in respect of retrospective claims for backdated attendant care payments under the 1972 and 1982 Acts. [2] At the Authority’s direct...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...December 2016 at which counsel for the respondents sought more time to take instructions and consider the issues arising from the application. [4] A further judicial telephone conference was scheduled for 20 January 2017, but postponed at the request of the Applicants to 3 February 2017. During that conference, an issue was raised about the meaning of the definition of "intensive farming" in the Auckland Unitary Plan. There was a suggestion that the issue might be addresse...