Search Results

1. Mitchell - Estate of Madeline Trotter or Albertina Decima Madeline Trotter (2004) 108 South Island MB 119 (108 SI 119) [pdf, 156 KB]

   IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Hearing: Applicant: Introduction Wellington C M Wainwright, Judge Claire Mason, Clerk of the Court 26 Novem ber 2004 A20030007213 Madeline Trotter or Albertina Decima Madeline Trotter 118/93 5 October 2004 Cheryl Kaye Descima Mitchell RESERVED DECISION 108 SI 119 On 18 December 2003, Cheryl Mitchell made an application to the court seek...

2. Taueki v The Trustees of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Trust (2011) 274 Aotea MB 191 (274 AOT 191) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...supporting her position. [14] In addition, Ms Taueki argues that her action in engaging counsel was not to delay the proceedings, on the contrary. She says that additional time for her lawyer who had just taken the case on was required but claims that the judge hearing the application denied the request. However, Ms Taueki says that when Horizon filed briefs one or two days before the hearing an extension was granted. Finally Ms Taueki says that she could think of nothing that s...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 98 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chef New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 144 KB]

   SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 98 [10 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 98 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a compliance order BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED D...

4. VS v WN [2022] NZDT 221 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...builders found that additional work required. On 26 July, Mr O agreed to the amended amount (after negotiating it down with Mr S). Then, on 3 August, Mr O advised Mr S that he did not want to continue with the work because his bank had declined his application for a loan for the work. 5. VS claim the sum of $3,615.94 being the costs incurred prior to the contract being cancelled. WN claim that the contract was conditional upon WN confirming that it had obtained finance for the work....

5. [2013] NZEmpC 61 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 56 KB]

   ALATIPI V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NZEmpC WN [2013] NZEmpC 61 [15 April 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2013] NZEmpC 61 WRC 4/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN WILLIE ALATIPI Intending Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Intended Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions dated 4 and 13 March 2013 Counsel: Gregory Bennett, adv...

6. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...The allegations made against Randerson J [10] In the separate “Bundle of Documents – Randerson J complaint by F Deliu” there is a letter dated 27 May 2010 from Mr Deliu to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. It opens: I write to lodge a formal complaint against Justice Randerson. The essential grounds of my complaint are that his Honour has: 1. Defamed me to the President of the New Zealand Law Society; 2. Refused to apologize to a fellow court officer as a duty of respect wo...

7. OWRUG - EiC - S H McKeague - Agriculture (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1022 KB]

   ...ORC data and information and collected their own extra science information where required. The ORC do have reliable data that can be used in this process. 3. Preparing for deemed permit replacement is an involved and complex process. 4. The applications that are lodged are comprehensive, address all aspects of the current plan, Plan change 7 and the RMA. 5. The farmers can not deliver the environmental gains they need to make for the rivers on 6 year permits. 6. Farmers can...

8. GQ v SJ [2017] NZDT 1169 (8 March 2017) [pdf, 68 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2017] NZDT 1169 BETWEEN GQ APPLICANT AND SJ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 8 March 2017 Referee: Referee: Murphy ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] Mr GQ and Miss SJ were neighbours. Mr GQ claims his vehicle was parked inside his property during the period 22 October 2016 to 24 October 2016 and Miss SJ’s son has caused damage to the bonnet...

9. CD v XS LCRO 186 / 2010 (27 May 2011) [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...186/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN MR CD Of North Island Applicant AND MR XS Of North Island Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In early 2008 the Applicant personally filed proceedings ag...

10. Procter [2012] NZWHT Auckland 22 [pdf, 76 KB]

    1 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 22 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6853: ROGER GEORGE PROCTER, PAULINE JANICE PROCTER AND GEOFFREY LEONARD PROCTER – 31 The Crowsnest, Whitby, Porirua ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Roger, Pauline and Geoffrey Procter are the owners of a property a...