12550 items matching your search terms
...MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN K L Complainant AND Mijin Kim Adviser THE NAME AND ANY INFORMATION IDENTIFYING THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person. Complainant: In person. Adviser: In person. Date Issued: 4 June 2015 2 DECISION...
LCRO 17/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SM Applicant AND TR and DH Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] SM has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee to take no further action...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 248 APPLICANT FQ RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay FQ $10,000.00 on or before 22 December 2022. Reasons 1. FQ purchased a [caravan] from T Ltd on 12 May 2022 for the cost of $143,000.00 for her and her husband and 2 children aged 7 months and 2 years to live in. She arranged and paid for...
LCRO 23/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN ZA Applicant AND YB Respondent DECISION – RECUSAL The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Recusal application [1] At the start of the review hearing in October 2015 Mr [ZA] requested an adjournment, and asked...
...Payment 16 3 Fee schedule 16 Change of lawyers 16 Disbursements 16 Travel 16 Interpreters/translators 17 Payment arrangements 17 Relationship with Legal Aid 18 Court entry 18 Concurrent legal aid cases 18 Without Notice applications 18 Appendix 1 – Glossary 19 Appendix 2 – Financial Eligibility Thresholds 21 Appendix 3 – Funding Declaration Form Example 22 Appendix 4 – Family Legal Advice Service (FLAS) Stages 25 Appendix 5 – Family Legal Advice...
...ARCHITECT LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1496058) Fourth Respondent AND DSF BUILDERS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1863635) Fifth Respondent AND CONTRACT HOLDINGS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 636388) Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 6 Removal applications by first and second respondents Dated 5 March 2024 2 Introduction [1] The first and second respondents have jointly applied to be removed from this proceeding under s 112 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution...
...submitted to the Tribunal until the day before the hearing. I would agree with the applicants that this kind of DNA test is not likely to be helpful in considering whether the puppy sold to TB and UB had the congenital condition referred to in the claim. 10) Further to the above, a puppy that experiences what this one did, about 10 days after a purchase, which is assessed as being likely to have the congenital condition in question, is not, I conclude, of acceptable quality for the purp...
...A20210005769 A20210004830 WĀHANGA Under Sections 238 and 241, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Kawerau A Section 13 and Others I WAENGA I A Between NGAWHAINGA KIRIONA Te kaitono Applicant ME And TE ARA GROOT, KIPA HOHEPA, MIHITERINA HOHEPA, PEREPE PHILLIP HOHEPA, KAPUA HOHEPA-WATENE, BLANCHE KIRIONA AND RAYMOND PATIHANA TOLLEY AS TRUSTEES OF THE TUKUAHAU WHĀNAU TRUST Ngā kaiurupare Responden...
...NOEL BARNES Third Respondent AND MASTER BUILD SERVICES LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND PLASTER SYSTEMS LIMITED Fifth Respondent Decision: 16 February 2012 COST DETERMINATION Adjudicator: K D Kilgour COSTS APPLICATION BY AUCKLAND COUNCIL [1] The Council was removed from this proceeding on 10 September 2010 in Procedural Order No 7. [2] The claimants appealed that determination and also judicially reviewed the Eligibility Decisions of the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2016] NZDT 1444 APPLICANT YT RESPONDENT ED Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: ED Limited is to pay the sum of $9,342.50 to YT on or before 1 September 2016. Reasons: 1. Mr T wished to build a minor dwelling at the back of his house. In April 2015, he contacted ED Limited (ED) and they started negotiations. On 2 July 2015, t...