Search Results

1. KN v BT [2020] NZDT 1365 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...further agreement regarding the driveway fence but no agreement was ever reached. Is BT liable to contribute to the cost of the driveway fence as claimed by KN? 9. Once no agreement was reached regarding the driveway fence, KN needed to issue a formal fencing notice to BT. This is required by section 10 of the Fencing Act 1978, and the Act details what is required to be specified in such a notice. 10. KN’s email to BT of 31 July 2020 contained 4 quotations as attachments an...

2. FD v TN & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 30 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...probabilities. 10. As a result of the above finding, TN was not negligent and is not liable for the losses suffered by FD/J Ltd as a result of the collision. Referee Perfect Date: 25 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. CD Ltd v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 279 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...interest on the claimed amount in accordance with the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016. Interest totals $171.41, so the total amount payable by CO Ltd is $9152.91. Referee Perfect Date: 10 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. OS v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 89 (23 March 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...depended upon when they arrived in OS’ letterbox. h. There is no evidence of what else E Ltd ought to have done or could have done when OS contacted them on 19 December. There is nothing to suggest that another courier company could have perform better or faster. 13. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 23 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you b...

5. D Ltd v P Inc [2025] NZDT 229 (16 June 2025) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...entitled to payment, as it is the entity that P Inc entered into a contract with. 8. For the above reasons the claim is dismissed. L Thompson Disputes Tribunal Referee 16 June 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. H Trustees Ltd v PT [2024] NZDT 512 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...situation PT finds himself in, on balance it would be unjust to allow rehearing at this late stage. Therefore, I dismiss PT’s application. Referee: Boys C DTR Date: 12 June 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 31 Zara's Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...whether disclosure is to be ordered.10 In particular Privacy Principle 11(e)(iv) allows for disclosure of information where it is for proceedings before a court. However, he criticised the application as extremely broad, describing it as a blanket request for all files and communications over an extended period. [17] Are the documents sought relevant? The first three parts of the application (at [2](a)–(c) above) are about Mr Kocatürk. I begin this assessment by considering...

8. HC & KP v QT [2023] NZDT 413 (10 July 2023) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...APPLICANT KP RESPONDENT QT The Tribunal orders: A. QT is to pay $2,610.00 to HC and KP on or before 30 July 2023, regardless of whether any work has been completed. B. The Applicant’s builder [Builder] is to perform the work as set out in the company’s quotation and scope of work dated 30 April 2023, at a time to be decided which is convenient to the company. C. The Applicants are to ensure that [Builder] gives QT 24 hours notice in writing placed...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 18 Pathways Health Ltd v Moxon [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...psychology and social work and was employed by the plaintiff in 2005 as a registered health professional. [3] In August 2009, the plaintiff raised concerns with the defendant about her conduct. These ultimately led to the defendant receiving a formal warning in April 2010. The defendant raised a personal grievance which was lodged with the Authority. In addition to remedies for the personal grievance, the defendant also sought reimbursement of her costs of representation in the i...

10. DQ v UP [2022] NZDT 211 (9 December 2022) [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...‘BS’. DQ received BS from UP on or about 3 September 2021 when he was around eight weeks of age. 2. DQ says that BS has two significant physical health issues which were diagnosed while he was still a young puppy, that is, an antebrachial limb deformity with carpal valgus in the left front leg, and double hip dysplasia. The diagnoses were provided to DQ by T Veterinary Hospital (“T Vets”), and by BX a specialist small animal surgeon from ABC University who has had two consultat...