12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 395 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: EN is to pay the sum of $575.00 to EM by no later than 10 June 2024. Reasons: 1. EM claims she was driving on [road 1] when EN pulled out of a side road without giving way. EN’s vehicle collided with EM’s vehicle causing damage. EN left the scene without stopping and providin...
...Walter Paterson, Tom Smiler, Rawinia Paterson, Daniel Paterson. 10. The Court was later notified that Tangiwai Campbell (holding 174.661 shares) wanted her son and the lessee, Isaac Campbell, to be her spokesperson during the hearing. He claimed she opposed the application. It was claimed that Mark Hemotu Campbell also objected. Opposition to the application was also informally received by way of phone calls from Margaret Henry (87.3305 shares), Tom Campbell (87.3305 share...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1480 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT AW The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BN owns the property on [street], Masterton. AW owns an adjoining property at [street], Masterton. Nobody lives in AW’s house on [street], but until recently, the property was used by AW’s brother to store various item...
...supervision substantially in excess of that normally required by a child of the same age and sex; or (c) regular supervision from another person in order to avoid substantial danger to himself or others. [12] Section 11D of the Act set out the application process for benefits. Section 11D(1) states that a benefit must not be granted until an applicant has complied with s 11D(2) which requires an application form and any supporting evidence reasonably required by the Chief Executive...
...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Background [1] On 7 May 2014 the plaintiff lodged a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) on a preliminary issue. 1 The context is a claim by the plaintiff that he was entitled to a bonus, subject to relevant conditions being satisfied, for the period 1 August 2003 until 7 September 2010. The preliminary issue related to whether that entitlement continued for the period 1...
...claimed would be inappropriate. [35] I accordingly dismiss this challenge. Mr Lorigan’s application of 13 March 2018 requesting this Court to “jointly and severally order and compel the defeat, muting and removal of the defendant’s invalid claims of legal professional privilege/s” [36] Mr Lorigan filed a memorandum asserting that Infinity’s claim for legal professional privilege is invalid. 12 Yu v Zespri International L...
...BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND Applicant (Rights Owner) AND TELECOM NZ 4451 Respondents BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL WARWICK SMITH HEARING ON THE PAPERS DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application by Recording Industry Association of New Zealand Incorporated (“the Applicant”) for an order under s.122O of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (“the Act”). The Applicant seeks an order for payment...
...and/or cancel licences issued pursuant to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. The licences in question relate to the premises that were operated by the defendants which were places where breaches of employment standards took place. [10] The applicant believes that the present sale and purchase of each business (excluding Samra Brothers Ltd) and the subsequent new licence applications are a contrivance and an attempt to conceal the beneficiaries of the licence privilege. The appl...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 116 APPLICANT SC RESPONDENT CX The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. This matter was heard by teleconference on 9 March 2022. It was adjourned to give both parties an opportunity to provide me and each other with text messages, photographs and any other evidence or arrange for any witnesses they...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 48 APPLICANT CU RESPONDENT QD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. CU placed an order for 2 booklets to be printed with QD Ltd though its website. From statements on QD Ltd’s website and in emails he received from QD Ltd he expected the booklets to be delivered before Queens Birthday Weeke...