Search Results

1. DE v SC [2023] NZDT 499 (10 October 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...for the accident, and for the damage to both DE’s vehicle and to SC’s vehicle is the driver of [car 2]. 16. The claim against SC is dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 10 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. XS v UQ [2024] NZDT 132 (19 March 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...7. The amount claimed is the final price for the work less an adjustment for depreciation of the wall. 8. The claim is proved. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Tuesday, 19 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. MM v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 503 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...take into account that this was a second-hand vehicle. My view might be different if it was new. 9) In these circumstances the claim must be dismissed. Referee: GP Rossiter Date: 8 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. Practice directions

   PRACTICE NOTE: As Directed by the Adjudicator under clause 1 of Schedule 1 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 On this page: Information that needs to be included with your application Adjournments Remote viewing of hearings Practice direction: Information that needs to be included with your application This practice direction sets out the policy and procedures of the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal (MVDT) about the information that needs to be included with your application. You must provide

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal

5. QC Ltd (in liquidation) v WD Ltd [2020] NZDT 1326 (4 August 2020) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...QCL the sum of $800.00. As this sum if GST inclusive, QCL is requested to issue a fresh or amended invoice for GST purposes. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 4 August 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

6. Johnston Property Holdings Limited [2014] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...for reconsideration requires the claimant to provide sufficient details to support the application. In this section Ms Johnston stated that the company would provide evidence to confirm that the property was built after August 2003. Ms Johnston requested an extension of time to provide this evidence. [4] On 5 March 2014 the Tribunal Chair, Ms McConnell, wrote to JPL at the address provided and sent a copy of this letter to Mr Johnston by email to the email address provided. M...

7. Form 16 Waitangi Tribunal Invoice [pdf, 225 KB]

   Legal Aid Services use only Approve Further information Refuse Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 16 Tax Invoice Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings Legal Aid File No. Invoice Reference No. GST Number Invoice Date To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer WAI Number Inquiry Lead provider Law firm Details of Claim Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Stage of...

8. Form-20a_Civil_non-Fixed.pdf [pdf, 186 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 Use this form to claim for any Civil matter other than Family, Waitangi and fixed fee proceedings. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Details of claim Forum category 1 2 3 4 Type of proceedings this invoice covers: Covers period from: to Interim invoice Final invoice Lead Provider Listed Provider B Provider name or numbe...

9. OP & EI v GJ Ltd [2019] NZDT 1305 (14 October 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...with the issues that arose, would not have wanted to buy them for this house (s21; s36). 11. The unusual features of the windows render them unsuitable for the applicants’ property and as a result, the consequences of not being adequately informed are considerable. Are the applicants entitled to a refund? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 12. Where goods are supplied that are not fit for purpose, and that failure is substantial, a consumer is entitled to reject the goods...

10. BT v KG [2020] NZDT 1457 (16 March 2020) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...email from Partridges to BT noted that it was surprised to be told by Rolex that this was not a genuine product. I find it more likely than not that if BT had asked Partridges to examine the watch prior to purchase he would have been given the same information that KG had been given as to its genuineness and value. The date on the valuation KG had was 7 November 2019, which was 5 days before BT agreed to buy the watch. 23. The Tribunal has to consider what relief should be granted.