Search Results

1. KN & NN v FO Ltd [2024] NZDT 69 (12 January 2024) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 69 APPLICANT KN APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT FO Ltd The Tribunal orders: KN and NN are not liable to pay $485.00 to FO Ltd. Reasons 1. The Applicants seek a declaration of non-liability in relation to an invoice for the cost of repairs to the fibre cable on the property at [address]. 2. The fibre cable connection was damaged when a tree planted along the inside boundary of the...

2. USM v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 291 (27 September 2022) [pdf, 153 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 291 APPLICANT AND COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT USM RESPONDENT AND COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders and declares: 1. USM is to pay Q Ltd $95.00 by 11 October 2022. 2. USM is not liable to pay Q Ltd $321.71. 3. Q Ltd’s claim for a balance of $330.35 is dismissed. Reasons: 1. USM seeks a declarat...

3. SN v VO Ltd [2021] NZDT 1679 (29 October 2021) [pdf, 231 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1679 APPLICANT (Counterclaim Respondent) SN RESPONDENT (Counterclaim Applicant) VO Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. VO Ltd is to pay to SN the sum of $1,600.00 on or before 19 November 2021. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SN worked as a contractor for VO Ltd (“VO Ltd”) throughout 2...

4. PR1 Affidavit of assets and liabilities [pdf, 141 KB]

   1  r 398(1), (2) Form P(R) 1 Affidavit of assets and liabilities Property (Relationships) Act 1976   In the Family Court at ………………………………………………. FAM No: ………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. [full name] …………………………………………………………………………�€...

5. LL v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 3 (30 January 2019) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...provide all the immigration advice, albeit through a local migration company acting as an intermediary. That company is independent of him. [3] The essential issues are whether the company’s staff, unlicensed under New Zealand law, have performed immigration services unlawfully and whether Chinese law qualifies Mr Sun’s professional obligations. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Jianya Sun, also known as Bill Sun, is a licensed immigration adviser. He is resident in Shanghai. [5] In Jan...

6. TE v QU Ltd [2023] NZDT 53 (12 January 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 53 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT QU Ltd The Tribunal orders: QU Ltd is to pay TE $4,000.00 by 26 January 2023. Reasons: 1. In April 2021, TE took her laptop to QU Ltd for repairs. QU Ltd lost her laptop’s hard drive, and she claims compensation of $10,000.00. 2. Both parties attended the hearing. Background 3. On 12 Ap...

7. Morrison - Te Kaha No.2C Block (2014) 105 Waiariki MB 183 (105 WAR 183) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...183 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110010365 A20130009571 UNDER Sections 289 and 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act IN THE MATTER OF Te Kaha No. 2C Block KATHLEEN MAY MORRISON Applicant Hearing: 24 January 2012, 48 Waiāriki MB 78-87 (Te Kaha Site visit) 7 March 2012, 51 Waiāriki MB 102-127 8 May 2012, 54 Waiāriki MB 284 29 June 2012, 57 Waiāriki MB 121-124 12 September 2012, 62 Waiāriki MB 41...

8. Watson v Employers Mutual Ltd (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...McKenzie for plaintiff Ms P Muir and Ms R Judge for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 15 October 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL REGARDING COSTS1 [1] In a decision dated 23 March 2020 Ms Watson’s claim was struck out, as it was not within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Costs were reserved. See Watson v Employers Mutual Limited (Strike-out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 10. [2] Employers Mutual Limited (EML) has now applied for costs...

9. GP v SKS Ltd [2017] NZDT 1168 (10 February 2017) [pdf, 76 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2017] NZDT 1168 BETWEEN GP APPLICANT AND SKS Ltd RESPONDENT KS SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 10 February 2017 Referee: Referee: Murphy ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that GP is to pay SKS Ltd $1321.58 on or before 2 March 2017. Facts [1] SKS Ltd installed a security system at Mr GP’s residence. Mr GP paid an installation fee and signed a three year agreement for th...

10. UL v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 383 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

    (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 383 APPLICANT UL RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UL purchased a “remanufactured” [laptop] from Q Ltd for $781.13 on 2 March 2020. Almost three years later (on 2 February 2023,) the laptop’s screen suddenly went black, and UL has been unable to use it. He claimed the laptop was not of acceptable quality as it was not...