12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 451 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT HN The Tribunal orders: HN is to pay C Ltd $2060.00 on or before the 25th day of July 2023. Reasons: Introduction: 1. C Ltd entered into a contract via a contra agreement with HN around the 15th day of November 2022. C Ltd was to paint a stock car belonging to HN free of charge and...
...CONSOLIDATED PRESS NZ LTD AK AC 15A/08 3 July 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 15A/08 ARC 23/08 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN RICHARD RUSSELL POTTER Plaintiff AND AUSTRALIAN CONSOLIDATED PRESS NZ LTD Defendant Hearing: 15 May 2008 Subsequent affidavit filed on 29 May 2008 by the plaintiff and a...
...[2017] NZEmpC 41 ARC 55/13 ARC 79/13 ARC 25/14 ARC 48/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of applications for leave to raise personal grievances out of time and pursuant to s 4(7) Limitation Act 1950 to bring proceedings BETWEEN KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE First Plaintiff AND RONALD CRONIN-LAMPE Second Plaintiff
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1332 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT MF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms F signed up online to complete a course of weekly online business coaching with Mr N. The sessions were one hour, and cost $99.00 each. 2. On 10 November 2019, Ms F advised that she wished to terminate the coaching serv...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 472 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT EL The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Introduction: Reasons: 1. T Ltd had filed a previous application with the Disputes Tribunal being [file number]. Under this application V Ltd was ordered to pay T Ltd for an outstanding debt. 2. V Ltd went into liquidation...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 292 APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay OX $334.99 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. OX purchased a pair of [headphones] from [retail store] on 19 October 2019 for $334.99. 2. In late 2022-early 2023, OX noticed that the right earbud kept dyin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 310 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT NX The Tribunal orders: NX is to pay BI the sum of $23,000.00 on or before 12 June 2024. Reasons: 1. On 14 January 2024 NX was driving on [road]. She was distracted by a friend in her car who was crying. This caused NX to collide with a parked car on the side of the road. 2. The parked car was owned...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 161 APPLICANT DE and KE T/A D&K Rentals RESPONDENT TL The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the applicant has been corrected to the names of the partners t/a D&K Rentals 2. TL is to pay $13,417.14 to DE and KE t/a D&K Rentals on or before 14 October 2022. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 3. On 14 Marc...
...September 2009. 245 Aotea MB 125 [3] The issues for consideration are whether it is still appropriate to grant an injunction as sought, whether the Board has acted in contempt and whether costs are now properly payable. Background [4] By application received on 24 July 2009 the Animal Health Board requested the Registrar to convene meetings of beneficial owners for Mangahouhou 1, Oraukura 1, Waihi Kahakaharoa 8A, 8B and Waipapa 2B 2A. The purpose of the proposed meetin...