12550 items matching your search terms
...February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 16 EMPC 254/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of costs in regard to an application for a stay of proceedings BETWEEN BEST HEALTH PRODUCTS LIMITED Plaintiff AND CHERIE NEE Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by memoranda dated 4, 22 December 2015, 12, 13 January and 16 February 2016)...
...Counsel were subsequently obtained. [7] On 19 August 2014, a telephone conference was held with counsel for the applicant (Mr Anthony Sinclair) and counsel for the respondent trustees (Mr Webb). A timetable, for the filing of any Statement of Claim or further particulars, a statement of defence and evidence for both parties, was agreed to. During the conference, Mr Sinclair advised that the applicant filed the current application before the Court on behalf of David Sinclair who is an...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 31 EMPC 273/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for discovery against a non- party BETWEEN ZARA’S TURKISH LIMITED Plaintiff AND GÜLER KOCATÜRK Defendant EMPC 158/2018 AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to a determination of the...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 435 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT KE The Tribunal orders: KE is to pay M Ltd the sum of $3,611.00 on or before 29 September 2023. Reasons: 1. KE asked M Ltd to come to his property and provide a quote to carry a variety of exterior cleaning tasks. 2. On 4 May 2023 M Ltd came to the property, carried out an inspection...
...179/2010 and 180/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN MR IP of Auckland Applicant AND AND SI Respondent (LCRO 179/10) of Auckland SH Respondent (LCRO 180/10) of Auckland DECISION The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 344 APPLICANT (FIRST RESPONDENT TO COUNTER-CLAIM) H Ltd (SECOND RESPONDENT TO COUNTER-CLAIM) NB RESPONDENT QU APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QU and his insurer Q Ltd are to pay X Ltd a total of $10,324.80 on or before Friday 4 August 2023. Of this...
...SECOND APPLICANT AND ZYZ, ZYY and ZYX as Trustees RESPONDENTS Date of Order: 8 February 2013 Referee: Referee A Davidson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicants’ claim is dismissed. Facts [1] The parties own neighbouring properties in [a place]. The Applicants wished to replace the fence between the properties and served a notice on the Respondents under the Fencing Act 1978, s...
...details .............................................................................................................. 11 Your local legal aid office ............................................................................................ 11 Applications ................................................................................................................... 15 Eligibility ..........................................................................................................
...TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ A H C WARREN Judgment of Judge A H C Warren 486 Aotea MB 32 Hei Tīmatanga Introduction [1] Shelly Puohotaua requests that I should recuse myself from sitting on an application she filed under s 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act), seeking to remove all responsible trustees of the Rakato B Māori Reservation Trust (the removal application). [2] I declined the recusal request after hearing from...