Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. Legal aid induction guide for legal aid providers [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...details .............................................................................................................. 11 Your local legal aid office ............................................................................................ 11 Applications ................................................................................................................... 16 Eligibility ..........................................................................................................

2. NQ v OW Ltd [2021] NZDT 1604 (28 June 2021) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...other kind of tort or in contract or on any other basis whatsoever for any consequential or indirect loss whatsoever arising from or in connection with any loss or damage to the goods. 40. OW Ltd have excluded liability for the consequential losses claimed by NQ. 41. The CGA cannot be contracted out of and OW Ltd would remain liable for foreseeable consequential losses arising out of its breach of the CGA as found by the Tribunal. However, the losses claimed by NQ were consequen...

3. SI v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 326 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...adjourned as B Ltd (represented by OT) were awaiting confirmation from [airline] (via SI’s travel agent) of any refund due to SI for cancelled flights ([City 2] to [City 3] to [City 4]). B Ltd confirmed their intention to refund SI’s portion of the claim less any refund from [airline]. They do not consider that NI’s portion of the claim is within the scope of the policy. 3. At the resumed hearing, SI confirmed that he has accepted the offer of $12,554.65 from B Ltd in respect o...

4. EQ v FI Ltd [2024] NZDT 394 (13 May 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 394 APPLICANT EQ RESPONDENT FI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Respondent party is corrected to be FI Ltd. The claim by EQ is dismissed. Reasons 1. EQ filed a claim for the cost of a second set of car keys against HU, a salesman at FI Ltd. At the hearing, it was agreed that FI Ltd was the correct respondent party...

5. What happens next

   This diagram shows the process a claim goes through, from application to outcome. You can find a more detailed explanation of the Tribunal process later in this section and in the Homeowners' Guide (link below). Things to note: We'll let you know when your claim has been received. This is does not mean your claim has been accepted. You and your insurer can reach a settlement at any stage in the process. At each stage in the process, you’ll be kept informed of the next steps and what you need...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal

6. KH v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 420 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 420 APPLICANT KH RESPONDEN T N Ltd The Tribunal orders: KH is to pay N Ltd the sum of $18,711.24 within 21 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. The applicant contracted the respondent to transport a mobile home from [City 1] in the [Country] to [City 2] (“the freight service”). 2. The respondent invoiced the applic...

7. Rata - Whataarakai No 1 Roadway and Lot 1 Deposited Plan 374627 [2020] Chief Judge's MB 74 (2020 CJ 74) [pdf, 432 KB]

   ...cancelling roadway and laying out new roadway made at 5 Tākitimu MB 239-247 on 12 November 2010 and made at 40 Tākitimu MB 16-18 on 6 May 2015 KOHINE RATA, PHILLIP HUTANA, LILY WILCOX and HENARE HUTANA Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 9 December 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1493-1518 (Heard at Hastings) Whakataunga: Judgment date 7 February 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA TUARUA C L FOX Judgment of De...

8. LCRO 227/2015 ZM v KT [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...file. [3] That request was made pursuant to s 147 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [4] That section is commonly relied on by a Standards Committee when it decides, in the course of a conduct inquiry, that it requires further information from the practitioner. [5] Mr ZM did not comply with the s 147 request. 2 [6] In due course, charges were laid with the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal). [7] One of the charges was...

9. LN v JH Ltd [2022] NZDT 16 (18 February 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 16 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT JH Ltd The Tribunal orders: JH Ltd is to pay the sum of $22.00 to LN on or before 11 March 2022. Reasons: 1. On 28 May 2021, LN and his wife travelled from [City A] to [City B] on a bus, having purchased tickets from the JH Ltd. LN was very unhappy with the service, and now claims a refund o...

10. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

    ...Plan 3020 and Section 2 Survey Office Plan 339948 and Others (Shelly Bay) I WAENGA I A Between MIKE TE WHAREHURU GILBERT, MARTHA HINEONE GLIBERT, KAREN MARAMA PARATA, MABEL URU TANIRAU AND ROGAN RAWIRI HAHOPE TANIRAU Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearings 6 August 2021, 441 Aotea MB 117-146 (Heard at Wellington) 31 January 2023, 461 Aotea MB 49 Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment date C Hockly for Applicants T Cooley for Firs...