12550 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 770 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT JG SECOND RESPONDENT WG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 15 June 2017, B Ltd loaned $4,000.00 to JG and WG (the debtors) for the purpose of car repairs, to be paid by instalments of $360.00 per month, at an annual interest rate of 28.95% (loan number). On 15 De...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 119 APPLICANT ZG RESPONDENT DD Limited SECOND RESPONDENT GT The Tribunal orders: 1. GT is to pay ZG a total of $12,340.00 on or before Friday 21 July 2023. 2. While the claim against DD Limited is dismissed, it undertook to pay ZG $1000.00. So, I order DD Limited to pay ZG the total sum of $1000.00 on or before Friday 21...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1484 APPLICANT GF Limited RESPONDENT QQ SECOND RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The address for both respondents is changed to [address]. 2. QQ and KQ, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $15,000.00 to GF Limited on or before Wednesday 21 November 2018. Reasons: 1
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 777 APPLICANT FQ RESPONDENT EB The Tribunal orders: EB is to pay the sum of $951.13 to FQ on or before 20 November 2023. Reasons: 1. EB (the seller) listed a mountain bicycle on [Website], described in response to questions as “mint” condition, no upgraded components, and no damage to the frame. On 20 August 2023, FQ (the buye...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1458 APPLICANT XT Limited RESPONDENT NN SECOND RESPONDENT B Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER JB Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: NN is to pay the sum of $4,923.07 to JB Limited on or before Monday 20 March 2017. Reasons: 1. On 7 August 2015, a very windy day, Ms N was get...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 983 BETWEEN EP APPLICANT AND UK LTD RESPONDENT AND UKU LTD SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 7 December 2016 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the first respondent, UK Ltd, is to pay the sum of $3530.82 directly to EP on or before 26 December 2016 and EP is declared to be not liable for the amount of $670.74. The claim against the...
...certain? [60] What were the essential terms? [64] H3 house [71] H2 and G houses [73] How was ownership to be achieved? [75] Are the timeframes clear to fulfil the terms agreed? [79] Other clauses [81] Overall conclusion on the contractual claims [85] He taunakitanga kua puta e pā ana ki te whakaaweawe kino, te muremurenga, kia ea te whakakorenga o te whakatatū? – Was there evidence of undue influence and unconscionability, justifying the setting aside of the agreements...
1 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 04 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6971: MANCHESTER SECURITIES LIMITED – Unit 12, 196 Hobson Street, Auckland ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Manchester Securities Limited is the owner of units 12 and 12A of a multi-unit complex at 196 Hob...
...AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT LTD Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 8 Removal application by sixth respondent Dated 15 March 2022 2 Introduction [1] Wilton Joubert Limited, the sixth respondent, has applied to be removed as a party to this claim. Legal principles Removal [2] Section 112(1) of the Wea...
...Sampling 8 Fee setting approach 8 Provider rates and hearing activities 8 Fee schedules 8 ACC legal aid operational policy changes 9 Case management 9 Amendments to grants 9 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agent’s fees 10 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 10 New forms 10 Changes to existing policy 10 Reassignment policy 10 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Appendix: Proposed fee schedules 12 ACC Interim Grant only 12...