Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11232 items matching your search terms

  1. T v Mudaliar [2015] NZIACDT 79 (06 August 2015) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN E B T Complainant AND Viveg Lingam Mudaliar Adviser THE NAME AND ANY INFORMATION IDENTIFYING THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms S Blick, lawyer, MBIE, Auckland. Complainant: In person Adviser: Mr N King, Lawyer, Auckland. Date Issued:...

  2. TO Ltd v DD Ltd [2019] NZDT 1462 (11 December 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...show that the buyer relies on the seller’s skill and judgment, and the goods are of a description that it is in the course of the seller’s business to supply. 5. With the proposal DD LTD provided a page entitled Conditions of Sale, and an information sheet on testing packaging and products. 6. The conditions of sale include a subheading “fit for purpose” which states: “we do not warrant the goods supplied to be compatible with any particular product or manufacturing

  3. QH v KH [2020] NZDT 1467 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...currently work and it is not known exactly when it stopped working. It is shown working in the marketing photos for the property. In the emails presented, the pool light is noted to be functioning on 12 June, 4 days before settlement. By 3 July QH had informed the real estate agents that it was not working. There is no further evidence as to when it failed. For these reasons I find that it is not proven on the balance of probabilities that the light failed prior to settlement. Therefore,...

  4. NT v BP Ltd [2022] NZDT 5 (17 January 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...“unit” is defined as the whole pallet (s247(1)(c)(i)). 10. The liability of the respondent is therefore limited in this case to $2,000.00. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 17 January 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  5. KN v BT [2020] NZDT 1365 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...further agreement regarding the driveway fence but no agreement was ever reached. Is BT liable to contribute to the cost of the driveway fence as claimed by KN? 9. Once no agreement was reached regarding the driveway fence, KN needed to issue a formal fencing notice to BT. This is required by section 10 of the Fencing Act 1978, and the Act details what is required to be specified in such a notice. 10. KN’s email to BT of 31 July 2020 contained 4 quotations as attachments an...

  6. FD v TN & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 30 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...probabilities. 10. As a result of the above finding, TN was not negligent and is not liable for the losses suffered by FD/J Ltd as a result of the collision. Referee Perfect Date: 25 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

  7. CD Ltd v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 279 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...interest on the claimed amount in accordance with the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016. Interest totals $171.41, so the total amount payable by CO Ltd is $9152.91. Referee Perfect Date: 10 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  8. OS v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 89 (23 March 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...depended upon when they arrived in OS’ letterbox. h. There is no evidence of what else E Ltd ought to have done or could have done when OS contacted them on 19 December. There is nothing to suggest that another courier company could have perform better or faster. 13. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 23 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you b...

  9. Soulsby v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 31 [pdf, 301 KB]

    ...February 2024 Held at: Auckland District Court Appearances: J Robinson for the Appellant F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 19 February 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for interest on weekly compensation - s 114(1), backdated weekly compensation – s 105, cl 43, Sch 1, alleged delay, s 134(1)(b), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] These are appeals from the follow...

  10. LCRO 9/2024 & 12/2024 QB v WF and SY & WF and SY v QB (27 June 2024) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...is 28 August. [15] On , the employer gave each of the respondents another letter. This one, after confirming disestablishment of their roles and dealing with the non- availability of redeployment, relevantly stated as follows: At our meeting you requested and we agreed to waive the notice period and to allow you to finish on [date 1]. We also agreed that your final pay would be processed on [date 1]. You will be paid out all wages and holiday pay owing up to Friday [date 1], plus 4 w...