12924 items matching your search terms
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 81 EMPC 130/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF application for further disclosure BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND ASPARONA LIMITED First Defendant AND DELOITTE LIMITED Second Defendant AND DELOITTEASPARONA LIMITED Third Defendan...
...third grounds for increased costs are that Mr Brill alleges that the Labour Inspector, by pursuing the case against him when the Labour Inspector would have known from the facts that the case could not succeed, was vexatious and was in pursuit of a claim which clearly lacked merit. [11] So far as the Calderbank offer is concerned, Mr Brill, in his submissions, relied upon The Commissioner of Salford School v Campbell8 in which the Court of Appeal approved a passage from an earlier...
...RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for deemed cover - s 58, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] Appeal 214/21 is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 17 August 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review, declining Ms Watson deemed cover for a chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Appeal 236/21 (concerning costs) was discontinued by Ms Watson on 21 December 2023. 2 Background [2] Ms Watson was born in 1981. S...
...different Member of the Authority consider the matter.2 Those determinations followed an earlier determination in which the Authority dismissed the substantive proceedings before it mainly on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prosecute its claims.3 These proceedings, therefore, have a considerable history before both the Authority and the Court. 1 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [2018] NZERA Auckland 185. 2 GEA...
...AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 78 [29 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 78 EMPC 43/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application by the defendant to extend time for filing a challenge to a determinaton of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION First Plaintiff AND MARISSA PANETTIERE Second Plai...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 663 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT XQ Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2024 SB was issued with a parking infringement notice and fine by XQ Limited. XQ Limited alleged SB did not comply with parking terms and conditions at its [City] Central [supermarket] site. The breach notice and fine have since been waived by XQ Li...
THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision [2021] NZEnvC ottq the direct referral under s 87G of an application under s 127 of the Resource Management Act 1991 KRISTIN SCHOOL CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2021-AKL-000014) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Consent Authority Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Last case event: Waiver application filed by D Tolich dated 15 March 2021 Waiver application file...
I n the Maori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato-Maniapoto District DECISION: The Applications Minute Book: 84 T 2 File: A20050001586 and A20050001587 IN THE MATTER of an application under section 18(1 )(a) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 by Julie Beach to determine ownership of a dwelling on Poike 11 Block Two applications have been filed. The first, by Julie Beach, was filed on 11 January 2005 and seeks an order under section 18 (1 )(a)/93 declaring that she is the owne...
...File No: TRI 2010-101-000009/ DBH 06006 Citation: [2010] NZWHT Wellington 14 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 14 May 2010 Background Pursuant to sections 72 and 73 of the WHRS Act 2006, the Tribunal heard and determined the claim against the sixth respondent, Ms Donaldson separately. Ms Donaldson did not pursue a removal application as it was unlikely to succeed due to the requirements for removal outlined in Fenton v Building Code Consultants Ltd. Claim again...
...had travelled over 800,000kms when he bought it. I have no reason to doubt that the truck being tested and issued with the new COF was part of what induced him to purchase this ‘roadworthy’ vehicle. What is SG’s loss? 12. SG has claimed $7,000.00. He said that this is the amount of the shortfall regarding the repairs of $26,000.00. He has been told by the repairer that the cost could exceed $26,000 as the deconstruction may reveal other problems. 13. In consideri...