Search Results

1. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...The allegations made against Randerson J [10] In the separate “Bundle of Documents – Randerson J complaint by F Deliu” there is a letter dated 27 May 2010 from Mr Deliu to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. It opens: I write to lodge a formal complaint against Justice Randerson. The essential grounds of my complaint are that his Honour has: 1. Defamed me to the President of the New Zealand Law Society; 2. Refused to apologize to a fellow court officer as a duty of respect wo...

2. KD v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 315 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 315 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay $285.00 to KD on or before 13 June 2024. Reasons 1. In October 2023 KD booked, via [booking website], 6 nights accommodation at [accommodation] in [Town], operated by D Ltd, changing the booking to 5 nights the next day. The total cost of the stay was to be...

3. NP v KM [2023] NZDT 339 (8 March 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

4. NT v BP Ltd [2022] NZDT 5 (17 January 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 5 APPLICANT NT Limited RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT THIRD RESPONDENT BP Limited HN Limited TG Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. BP Limited is to pay to NT Limited t/a BE the sum of $2,000.00 on or before 14 February 2022. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased products from a company in [Country...

5. EF & QF v JD & QN [2021] NZDT 1690 (20 May 2021) [pdf, 112 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1690 APPLICANT EF APPLICANT QF RESPONDENT JD RESPONDENT QN The Tribunal orders: QN and JD are to pay $307.11 to QF and EF on or before Monday 7 June 2021. Reasons: 1. EF and QF said that after they purchased a house from QN and JD, they discovered the oven was not in working condition and there was a circu

6. Memorandum of Counsel CVA extension 17 August 2018 [pdf, 362 KB]

   LFJ-447097-3-1169-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ENV-2018-AKL-000078 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) A N D IN THE MATTER of direct referral of an application for resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant A N D AUCKLAND COUNCIL Re...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 61 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 56 KB]

   ALATIPI V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NZEmpC WN [2013] NZEmpC 61 [15 April 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2013] NZEmpC 61 WRC 4/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN WILLIE ALATIPI Intending Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Intended Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions dated 4 and 13 March 2013 Counsel: Gregory Bennett, adv...

8. VS v WN [2022] NZDT 221 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...builders found that additional work required. On 26 July, Mr O agreed to the amended amount (after negotiating it down with Mr S). Then, on 3 August, Mr O advised Mr S that he did not want to continue with the work because his bank had declined his application for a loan for the work. 5. VS claim the sum of $3,615.94 being the costs incurred prior to the contract being cancelled. WN claim that the contract was conditional upon WN confirming that it had obtained finance for the work....

9. [2017] NZEnvC 064 Mitchell Family Trust v Point Trust [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...December 2016 at which counsel for the respondents sought more time to take instructions and consider the issues arising from the application. [4] A further judicial telephone conference was scheduled for 20 January 2017, but postponed at the request of the Applicants to 3 February 2017. During that conference, an issue was raised about the meaning of the definition of "intensive farming" in the Auckland Unitary Plan. There was a suggestion that the issue might be addresse...

10. Koia - Wharekahika A13 - Potaka Marae (2006) 75 Ruatoria MB 155 (75 RUA 155) [pdf, 703 KB]

    Minute Book: 75 RUA 155 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT HAMILTON Hearing: Judgment: A20060024560 75 RUATORIA MB 155-166 UNDER Section 19(1)(b) ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Wharekahika A13 Block - Potaka Marae Ex parte application Chambers, Hamilton 21 September 2006 JASONKOIA Applicant DECISION OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY [1] Mr Koia applied for an injunction pursuant to section 19(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("the Act") to prevent the tr...