Search Results

1. TX v QC Ltd [2023] NZDT 94 (22 March 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...proven that the car was not of acceptable quality when TX purchased it. 7. For these reasons the second issue need not be determined, and the claim must be dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 22 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

2. EN v HM [2023] NZDT 581 (22 November 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...of the CGA and choose a refund or replacement. 9. As EN has chosen to have the purpose price refunded then HM must refund EN the purchase price in full. Referee: T Prowse Date: 22 November 2023. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. NB v TT [2023] NZDT 296 (21 July 2023) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...Section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act provides that where the case of any party is not presented to the Tribunal after a reasonable opportunity has been given to that party to do so, the matter may be resolved by the Tribunal on such evidence or information as is before it. 2. According to NB’s evidence at the hearing, NB and TT were friends. TT, the owner of a bar, asked NB to weld some of the chairs for the bar, as NB is a welder. They verbally agreed on a rate of $20.00 per cha...

4. EM v EN [2024] NZDT 395 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...that amount. 7. This matter was heard by teleconference on 24 May 2024 however the hearing proceeded in the absence of EN. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 28 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. JC v OF Ltd [2024] NZDT 397 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...apply merits and justice when reaching a decision and having done so I find the full rental cost should be paid. 4. For this reason I allow the claim. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 19 June 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

6. DH v FI [2024] NZDT 555 (23 July 2024) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...the loan was a joint one. On the evidence available she has not proved on the balance of probabilities that the loan was joint. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: J P Smith Date: 23 July 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. TL v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 541 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...the respondent has been unable to supply the agreed vehicle, the applicant is entitled to a full refund of the deposit paid. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 9 July 2024 1 Including credit card charges of $50 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. DE v TQ [2021] NZDT 1572 (20 July 2021) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...from B in the same manner and to the same extent as if the representation were a term of the contract that has been breached. A representation is a statement of fact, made by one contracting party to another, before or at the time the contract is formed. If that representation induced the party relying on it to enter into the contract, and that representation turns out to be incorrect, it is a misrepresentation to which s35(1)(a) of the CCLA applies. 8. TQ advertised the Boat for sale...

9. U Ltd v UH [2025] NZDT 220 (3 June 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...for payment of its invoices together with interest. 6. The issues to be determined to resolve the claim are: (a) What did UH engage U Ltd to do and was that work later varied? (b) Was it a term of the agreement that the works were to be performed by an agreed time, and if not, were the plans provided within a reasonable time? (c) Was U Ltd’s service provided with reasonable care and skill did it charge a reasonable price? 2 (d) Was UH entitled to cancel the contr...

10. Rafiq v Commissioner of Police [2012] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...Mr Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child and Mr T Hallett-Hook for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 and 12 April 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 23 May 2012 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] By letter dated 20 December 2010 Mr Rafiq requested access to the personal information held about him by the New Zealand Police. By letter dated 22 February 2011 the Police provided some information but other information was withheld pursuant to s 27(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 (dis...