Search Results

1. Taueki v The Trustees of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Trust (2011) 274 Aotea MB 191 (274 AOT 191) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...supporting her position. [14] In addition, Ms Taueki argues that her action in engaging counsel was not to delay the proceedings, on the contrary. She says that additional time for her lawyer who had just taken the case on was required but claims that the judge hearing the application denied the request. However, Ms Taueki says that when Horizon filed briefs one or two days before the hearing an extension was granted. Finally Ms Taueki says that she could think of nothing that s...

2. DJ v Dua [2019] NZIACDT 6 (14 February 2019) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...14 February 2019 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The adviser, Mr Dua, represented Ms DJ in respect of unsuccessful graduate work and visitor visas applications. The complainant says she was misled by Mr Dua, who advised her she could obtain a graduate experience work visa based on her employment in a takeaway shop. According to her, when that application failed he incompetently dealt...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 33 Lewis v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 148 at [117]. 2 JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Lewis (also cited as JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v Lewis) [2015] NZCA 255. 3 Lewis v JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. [2013] NZERA Auckland 18. [3] The defendant’s submissions in support of its claims for costs against the plaintiff Robert Lewis are lengthy and comprehensive. [4] First, the defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the Bank or JPMorgan) says that in view of its success in the Court of Appeal, Mr Lewis should pay it...

4. J Ltd v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 315 (15 May 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 315 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay $4,000.00 to J Ltd on or before 4pm on 16 June 2023 Reasons: 2. In February 2023 the applicant engaged the respondent to transport two consignments of untreated planks from [Town] to the respondent’s [City] depot. Consignment one was m...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 131 Young v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...withdrawn under sub-cl (1), it does not affect any other matters before the court that form part of the same proceedings.” [5] This allows for a part or parts of a proceeding to be withdrawn other than on an all-or-nothing basis. So, for example, an applicant or plaintiff may withdraw a claim to a particular remedy or one of a number of causes of action, without affecting the remaining matters. Despite the reference to such withdrawals being able to be made by “the applicant o...

6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 29 [pdf, 9 MB]

   Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter Rua tekau ma iwa Mahuru 1994 Number 29 September 1994 ISSN 0114·717X New claim raises big issues for AN AUCKLAND Maori Trust has told the Waitangi Tribunal that the way in which a Government funding agency allocates so­ cial service funding is in breach of the Treaty. THE CLAIM BYTe Whanau 0 Waipareira trust which had its first hearing in Auckland at the beginning of this...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 102 Kaipara District Council v McKerchar [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...determine costs, my present view is that there were no delays attributable to the parties or their counsel, or other factors which may have increased costs unnecessarily to this point. Further, although the case has been concluded on interlocutory applications, my view is that it would not be appropriate simply to deal with costs affecting interlocutory applications generally. The cross-applications for striking out the substantive proceedings had necessarily to be argued intensi...

8. Clark - Paritata B1 (2001) 93 Waikato MB 165 (93 W 165) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...IN THE MATTER of Applications by Tamatea Pareka Clark in respect of Parltata B1 Block fi rst for an occupation order under Section 328 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 and secondly for an injunction to prevent removal of a bach Mr Matenga for the Applicant Mr Tame Pokaia on behalf of the Trustees Application has been made by Tamatea Pareka Clark for an occupation order over a site on Paritata 91 Block. It was accompanied by a further application under Section 19(1 )(b)/93 for an inj...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 98 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chef New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 144 KB]

   SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 98 [10 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 98 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a compliance order BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED D...

10. CD v XS LCRO 186 / 2010 (27 May 2011) [pdf, 45 KB]

    ...186/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN MR CD Of North Island Applicant AND MR XS Of North Island Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In early 2008 the Applicant personally filed proceedings ag...