Search Results

1. TH v BC [2024] NZDT 141 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...for the collision. If so, was there damage caused to TH’s car? 38. I have viewed the photos and I have also read the Motor Vehicle repair assessment provided by TH’s insurer. I am satisfied that there was damage caused to TH’s car as claimed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 39. I am also satisfied that the damage caused is consistent with the collision as it has been described. If so, what is the remedy? 40. The normal measure of damages in a claim of ne...

2. Trustees in the Section 3 Block XIII Tautuku Trust v Cairns - Part Section 3 Block XIII Tautuku Survey District (2017) 42 Te Waipounamu MB 284 (42 TWP 284) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...respondents claimed to have sent an email notifying the applicants that they had removed their livestock from the Heads block. Further, it was their belief that an injunction hearing was unnecessary because they had already removed their sheep before the request for an injunction. [11] Regarding the application for costs, the respondents asked the Court to take into consideration that the applicants had only been partially successful in their application. Discussion Should costs b...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 152 Performance Cleaners v Chinan [pdf, 546 KB]

   ...WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 152 [1 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 152 EMPC 65/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for strikeout of challenge BETWEEN PERFORMANCE CLEANERS ALL PROPERTY SERVICES WELLINGTON LIMITED Plaintiff AND IOANA CHINAN Defendant Hearing: (on the papers dated 4 and 20 July, 1 and 18 Sep...

4. MC & TC v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 531 (27 September 2023) [pdf, 253 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 531 APPLICANT MC APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Background 1. In October 2022, MC and TC booked a 5-day [trek] with B Ltd. 2. The cost was $7,500.00. 3. MC and TC arrived at the [ranch] on 17 April 2023 for the commencement of t...

5. Trustees of the Speirs Family Trust [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...05928: DAVID AND REBECCA SPEIRS AS TRUSTEES OF THE SPEIRS FAMILY TRUST ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Background [1] Rebecca Speirs on behalf of the Speirs Family Trust has filed an application for reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision made under section 48 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). [2] Section 49 of the Act provides that claimants may apply to the Chair seeking...

6. UE & QO v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 289 (27 October 2022) [pdf, 85 KB]

   Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 289 APPLICANT UE and QO RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: The dispute is adjourned to a date to be fixed before Referee Hayes with ½ a day allocated for an in person hearing. Reasons: 1. The adjournment was required as there was insufficient time to conclude today’s hearing and the parties needed the opportunity to file fur...

7. FN & NH v K Ltd & O Ltd [2023] NZDT 466 (25 August 2023) [pdf, 247 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 466 APPLICANT FN APPLICANT NH RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay FN and NH $5,421.00 by 15 September 2023. Background 1. NH and FN own a property on [Address]. They wanted to carry out a two-lot subdivision. 2. They contacted K Ltd, a surveying business i...

8. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 39 KB]

   WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO: TRI-2008-101-000045 BETWEEN ALISON MARGARET HEARN, MURRAY DEANS AND HARTHAM TRUSTEES LIMITED AS TRUSTEES OF THE A HEARN FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PARKLANE INVESTMENTS LIMITED (NOW BOULCOTT INVESTMENTS GROUP LIMITED) First Respondent AND EMPA GROUP CONSULTANTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RAJU MORAR, NEESHA MORAR AND ISHWERAL MORAR AS TRUSTEES OF THE I & R...

9. Sansom v Department of Internal Affairs [2016] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...eventual redundancy. She also believes staff spread malicious rumours about her and that both within and outside the workplace she was the victim of sexual harassment. These grievances did not, however, motivate Ms Sansom to bring a personal grievance claim under the Employment Relations Act 2000. [7] But she has made a number of requests under the Privacy Act 1993 for access to personal information held by the Department. [8] In these proceedings Ms Sansom complains that in respondi...

10. AFS and AFT v ZUD and ZUE [2013] NZDT 348 (2 July 2013) [pdf, 104 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 348 BETWEEN AFS FIRST APPLICANT AND AFT SECOND APPLICANT AND ZUD FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZUE SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 2 July 2013 Referee: Referee Robertshawe ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZUE is to pay to AFS and AFT the sum of $10,063.02 within 28 days. Facts [1] On 9 December 2006, AFS and AFT entered i...