Search Results

1. Webster v Takarangi - Ngarara West B3B (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: Counsel: Judgment: Introduction A20070012511 UNDER Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993, section 19(1)(d) IN THE MATTER OF Ngarara West B3B AND 13,15 November 2007 JOHN MAXWELL WEBSTER Applicant GRAHAM HARPER TAKARANGI as agent for the former owners of N garara West B3B Respondent Mr L Watson for the applicant Mr G H Takarangi, agent for the former owners 19 November 2007 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY [I]...

2. SX v Q Ltd & TY [2024] NZDT 239 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...management company but Q Ltd repeatedly failed/refused to do so. 14. The day before the first hearing on 5 October 2023, Q Ltd made a substantial written submission, which included multiple inspection reports that SX had never seen before, in a format inconsistent with previous reports. 15. SX files this claim seeking $25,524.32 for a partial refund of management fees and damages for multiple breaches of contract. 16. TY was joined as a second Respondent after the first hearing d...

3. LCRO 109/2023 W and F JM v EB and MK [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...NZLCRO 106 Ref: LCRO 109/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN W JM and F JM Applicants AND EB and MK Respondents DECISION The names and identifying factors in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr and Mrs JM (the applicants) have applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Stan...

4. BB v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 10 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

5. UC & FC v GM [2021] NZDT 1645 (15 November 2021) [pdf, 221 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1645 APPLICANTS UC and FL RESPONDENT GM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UC and FL own [Address 1]. GM owns [Address 2]. 2. On or about 12 February 2019 the parties entered into an agreement (the agreement) whereby in exchange for UC and FL giving their written approval as affect...

6. CC v SN & KM [2023] NZDT 475 (25 August 2023) [pdf, 167 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 475 APPLICANT (claim and counterclaim respondent) CC RESPONDENT (claim and counterclaim applicant) SN RESPONDENT (counterclaim) KM The Tribunal orders: 1. A full replacement fence is to be constructed on the boundary between the parties’ properties at [Address]. 2. The fence is to be 45m....

7. AM and HM v TH and NH [2022] NZDT 69 (24 March 2022) [pdf, 244 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 69 APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim AM APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim HM RESPONDENT And Applicant for Counterclaim TH RESPONDENT NH And Applicant for Counterclaim The Tribunal orders: AM and HM are to pay $30,000.00 to TH and NH on or before Monday 11 April 2022. Reasons:

8. OWRUG - EiC - S H McKeague - Agriculture (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1022 KB]

   ...ORC data and information and collected their own extra science information where required. The ORC do have reliable data that can be used in this process. 3. Preparing for deemed permit replacement is an involved and complex process. 4. The applications that are lodged are comprehensive, address all aspects of the current plan, Plan change 7 and the RMA. 5. The farmers can not deliver the environmental gains they need to make for the rivers on 6 year permits. 6. Farmers can...

9. ET v SK [2023] NZDT 131 (5 March 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 131 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT SK The Tribunal orders: SK is to pay ET $9,396 by 6 April 2023. Reasons 1. In September 2021, ET bought a campervan that had been advertised on Trade Me from SK for $17,500. SK lives in the [redacted] and so ET also paid another $396 to have him transport it to [Town] where she picked it up. ET p...

10. MQ v HQ [2021] NZDT 1659 (14 July 2021) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1659 APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT HQ The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim for $986.00 + GST for replacement of fence palings is dismissed. 2. HQ is ordered to remove the doors (and any other similar material) currently attached to the boundary fence between the parties, on or before 31 August 2021. 3. If HQ fail...