Search Results

1. Hetaraka v Auckland Council - Allotments 170-176 Parish of Manurewa (2017) 158 Taitokerau MB 248 (158 TTK 248) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...A20160005924 UNDER Section 18(1)(h), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ngāti Tai Whenua AND BETWEEN TUARI HETARAKA AND DIANE DONEY Applicants 158 Taitokerau MB 250 Introduction [1] Applications have been filed by Tuari Hetaraka and others seeking: 1 (a) A determination that various parcels of land are Māori customary land; (b) To cancel or amend all orders concerning certain titles to land; and (c) Injunctive relief...

2. Wu v Manukau City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 65 [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...AND RRL GROUP LIMITED Third Respondent AND BERNARD DUFFY Fourth Respondent Decision: 7 December 2011 FINAL DETERMINATION Adjudicator: S Pezaro Page | 2 Background [1] Liang-Yuan Wu and Ling- Yu Kao Wu filed an application for adjudication on 17 June 2009. The claim was originally against the first, second and third respondents and the fourth respondent was joined on 3 September 2009. All parties attended mediation on 9 December 2009 and the Trib...

3. SG & LN v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 715 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...compensation for emotional distress associated with these difficulties and having to delay the unveiling to honour LN’s late father. 3. M Ltd, through its representative EH, says this is not a situation where M Ltd breached its agreement with the applicants but rather they have simply changed their mind about the design. In these circumstances it says M Ltd should not have to refund, or if any compensation is awarded, M Ltd should at least be able to retain its significant producti...

4. LG v IU Ltd [2022] NZDT 124 (16 August 2022) [pdf, 165 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 124 APPLICANT LG Ltd RESPONDENT IU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LG Ltd purchased a farm from IU Ltd, with settlement on 25 June 2021. A horse walker was listed as one of the farm chattels. 2. LG Ltd claims that IU Ltd breached the vendor warranty in clause 7.3(1) of the Agreement...

5. CL v TU [2024] NZDT 82 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 34 Advance International Cleaning Systems NZ Limited v Hamilton [pdf, 160 KB]

   ADVANCE INTERNATIONAL CLEANING SYSTEMS (NZ) LIMITED v STEVEN HAMILTON NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 34 [7 April 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 34 EMPC 36/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN ADVANCE INTERNATIONAL CLEANING SYSTEMS (NZ) LIMITED Applicant AND STEVEN HAMILTON Respondent Hearing: (on the papers filed on 11 and 25 February, 3 and 10 Mar...

7. GU v TI LCRO 258 / 2010 (19 December 2011) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...in Mrs GV’s house sometime between 1994 and 1995. He remained in occupation after her death. 2 [6] Mr TI attempted to register a transmission of the title to the property to the executors, but was prevented from doing so by a Notice of Claim pursuant to section 42 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 which had been lodged by Mr GV on 25 June 2009. He claimed an interest in the property on the grounds of a de facto relationship with Mrs GV. [7] Other aspects of the a...

8. Invoicing Quick Reference Guide [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...submitting invoices • Make sure the claim is made on the correct form. • Ensure the form contains the: o Correct legal aid grant number. o Name of the lead provider. o Provider number o Firm name. o Firm number. o GST number, if applicable. o Signature of the lead provider (electronic is accepted). • Ensure the invoice is filed in the correct timeframe, according to the grant type: o Fixed Fee grants - six months from the date that services are provided or...

9. HES v Parekh [2019] NZIACDT 36 (29 May 2019 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...obtain a visitor visa in the cultural marriage category to enter New Zealand to live with the complainant. [2] However, the written client agreement with Ms Parekh’s company was not signed by her and did not name her. Furthermore, the two visa applications lodged by Ms Parekh both wrongly stated that the couple had lived together. Nor did the couple otherwise meet Immigration New Zealand’s criteria for culturally arranged marriages. The applications were therefore unsuccess...

10. Mitchell - Estate of Madeline Trotter or Albertina Decima Madeline Trotter (2004) 108 South Island MB 119 (108 SI 119) [pdf, 156 KB]

    IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Hearing: Applicant: Introduction Wellington C M Wainwright, Judge Claire Mason, Clerk of the Court 26 Novem ber 2004 A20030007213 Madeline Trotter or Albertina Decima Madeline Trotter 118/93 5 October 2004 Cheryl Kaye Descima Mitchell RESERVED DECISION 108 SI 119 On 18 December 2003, Cheryl Mitchell made an application to the court seek...