Search Results

1. ET & MT v LS & B Ltd [2024] NZDT 294 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...connection to and love of animals. 10. In conclusion, I find that LS is not liable to pay ET and MT any compensation and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 8 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. LM v S Ltd [2025] NZDT 86 (28 May 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...recognise that LM was denied the opportunity to choose whether or not she wanted to proceed with the process. I accordingly order payment of $100. K Edwards Disputes Tribunal Referee 28 May 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. HR v KD & J Ltd [2025] NZDT 223 (9 July 2025) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...that her insurer is entitled to be compensated for? 7. HR is entitled be compensated for all the reasonably foreseeable loss she incurred as a consequence of the dogs hitting into her vehicle. Her vehicle was assessed before the repairs were performed, and the repairs were found to be consistent with the cause of the collision. 8. KD wrote that he could not see how some of the marks could have been caused by his dogs hitting into the HR’s vehicle, as his dogs did not have collars...

4. CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...the business was made available to ABF through ABE. The agreement between the parties was that the gross profits were to be shared equally between ABE and ABF. [3] ABF failed to account to ABE for any of the profits, and when pressed, counter- claimed. Part of the counter-claim related to goods which ABF had acquired at the direction of ABE to supply to a customer, but that supply contract did not eventuate. 2 [4] Proceedings requiring ABF to account for its profits and for a...

5. Taylor v Corrections (Jurisdiction) [2019] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...grounds it contained passages which could reasonably be construed as threats or attempts to intimidate the then Prison Manager, a former prisoner and police officers in the Hastings area. [2] On discovering the letter had been intercepted Mr Taylor requested that it be returned to him or that he be provided with a copy. His request was refused. [3] Mr Taylor thereupon made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner alleging a breach of IPP 6 which, subject to certain exceptions, provides...

6. [2022] NZACC 5 – Estate of Raymond Morris v ACC (18 January 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Hearing: On the papers Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: The appellant was self-represented when the appeal was lodged L Hawes-Gandar for the respondent Judgment: 18 January 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury - s 32, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 August 2020. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decisio...

7. LQ & SC Ltd v DD [2021] NZDT 1344 (31 March 2021) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...and compensation and if so, how much. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Has there been a misrepresentation? 8. A misrepresentation is a statement of fact, made by one contracting party to another, before or at the time the contract was formed, upon which the purchaser relies, that proves to be wrong. If there has been a misrepresentation, the purchaser is entitled to a remedy, even if the misrepresentation was made innocently and not deliberately. 9. The onus lies with an...

8. Feebee Investments Limited [2011] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 82 KB]

   1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6565: FEEBEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED – 7 BUTIA AVENUE, HENDERSON, AUCKLAND ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Feebee Investments Limited (Feebee) are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim under secti...

9. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...document was forwarded to TQ under covering letter dated 14 October 2000 for signing and return. But this purported only copy was kept and destroyed by TQ, presumably as a cover up exercise. [33] The letter stated as follows: “We enclose as requested herewith a copy of the contract duly signed by us for your files” (emphasis added). Strikingly, it did not say that the contract was being sent for signing by TQ. Nor did it request its return after signing. 15 [3...

10. Adams v ACC [2015] NZACA 3 [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...accident, in order to calculate the appropriate level of ERC. [6] The solicitor for Mr Adams wrote a letter to the Corporation on 28 June 1979 recording that no weekly compensation had been paid since 13 May and acknowledging that the Corporation had requested certain financial information. [7] The solicitor advised the Corporation that Mr Adams had earned $10,900 in the year ending 31 March 1978 working for Murupara Motors. In the year ending 31 March 1979, being the year of the a...