Search Results

1. BN & MN v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 51 (15 August 2013) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...steps until it was resolved. [5] The complainants say Mr Hakaoro failed to make proper inquiries, and charged them $6,000 when he could do nothing for them but led them to believe he would provide effective, professional services. He then lodged applications that were hopeless both due to the effect of the pending complaint, and because the application did not contain cogent grounds. [6] Mr Hakaoro, they say, provided no services of value, and then failed to refund the money when his...

2. Holden v Hanns [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...claim No TRI-2009-101-48 (Smitheram etc). 6. The grounds of the application are that the second respondent completed the work of designing the building at 105 Pirie Street more than ten years before the application for the assessor’s report. The applicant relies on s 4 Limitation Act 1950 and s 393 Building Act 2004. 7. The application for the Assessor’s report was made on 5 August 2008, so the cause of action must have arisen within 6 years before that date to be a valid clai...

3. AD v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 118 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...Policy. … [14] In the information provided by the Corporation on how to apply for CPX, it was stated that “if you agree with the terms and conditions of your policy offer, sign and return it within 28 days”. The declaration section (for the applicant’s signature) in the application form began with the heading: “We recommend you obtain professional independent advice relevant to your personal circumstances before signing this form.” [15] The CPX contract was renewed on...

4. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 75 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant has appealed against a review decision dated 7 October 2021. In this decision, the reviewer concluded that the appellant’s review application of 6 May 2021 was not in respect of a reviewable decision. The reviewer therefore dismissed the application for want of jurisdiction. Background [2] The appellant has cover for a physical injury and post-traumatic stress d...

5. Stockwell - Waimumu Hundred Block V sections 53, 54, 56 (2003) 103 South Island MB 140 (103 SI 140) [pdf, 76 KB]

   Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Hearing: Gisborne W W Isaac, Judge K W Lardelli, Clerk of the Court 2 September 2003 A19990005746 Minute Book: 103 SI 140- Waimumu Hundred Block V Sections 53, 54 and 56 43/93 5 July 2002 RESERVED DECISION AS TO COSTS 1. This application is an application for costs on behalf of Mrs Stockwell which arose at the conclusion of an application for a rehearing by Mr Roderique which was dismissed on 5 July 2002...

6. Chand v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 25 (14 March 2014) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...first in an expression of interest and then in an application for residence. [2] Immigration New Zealand readily ascertained the complainant was not a diesel mechanic and declined to issue a visa. [3] The complainant says he provided the relevant information for lodging the expression of interest to an unlicensed person in the adviser’s practice. [4] The adviser has answered the complaint saying the complainant had claimed to be a diesel mechanic, he had provided information to suppo...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 39 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...an application for leave to set aside or vary an order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to join party AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for interim non-publication order BETWEEN TPT FORESTS LIMITED Applicant AND TPT GROUP LIMITED Intended Second Applicant AND CRAIG PENFOLD First Respondent AND SIMON STRONGE Second Respondent Hearing: 18 December 2020 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances:...

8. Kaulima v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 22 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...R SPILLER [Interpretation of decision - s 6(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 25 October 2022. The Reviewer dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, an application for review of the Corporation’s communication of 18 September 2013. Background [2] Mr Kaulima has cover for amongst other things, a gradual process injury involving solvent exposure dating back to January 1995, and back and n...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 152 Juahm Industries Company Limited v Isnanto interlocutory [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...[2015] NZEmpC 152 [2 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 152 EMPC 139/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave BETWEEN JUAHM INDUSTRIES COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff AND APRIL ISNANTO AND 52 OTHERS Defendants Hearing: (on the papers filed on 24 July, 13 and 21 August 2015) Appearances: T Je...

10. [2007] NZEmpC WC 24/07 Monteith v Hakansson [pdf, 19 KB]

    MONTEITH V HAKANSSON WN WC 24/07 26 September 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 24/07 WRC 21/07 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN ESTHER JOHANNA MONTEITH Plaintiff AND EDITH ANNE HAKANSSON Defendant Hearing: 18 September 2007 (Heard at Wellington (by telephone conference)) Appearances: E J Monteith (in person) E A Hakansson (in person) Judgment: 26 September 2007 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE...