12549 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 236 APPLICANT G Ltd RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. H Ltd is to pay G Ltd $17,738.76 on or before Monday 25 March 2024. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. U Ltd, which has since changed its name to H Ltd (the client), was planning to open a new restaurant. On 29 June 2023, the client accepted a fee proposal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 511 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT TC APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: TC is to pay J Ltd $1,049.50 on or before Monday 26 August 2024. Reasons: 1. BW provided CCTV footage that showed he entered into an intersection controlled by lights. He was cycling extremely slowly and was positioned at almost the cen...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 48 APPLICANT CU RESPONDENT QD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. CU placed an order for 2 booklets to be printed with QD Ltd though its website. From statements on QD Ltd’s website and in emails he received from QD Ltd he expected the booklets to be delivered before Queens Birthday Weeke...
...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Background [1] On 7 May 2014 the plaintiff lodged a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) on a preliminary issue. 1 The context is a claim by the plaintiff that he was entitled to a bonus, subject to relevant conditions being satisfied, for the period 1 August 2003 until 7 September 2010. The preliminary issue related to whether that entitlement continued for the period 1...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 116 APPLICANT SC RESPONDENT CX The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. This matter was heard by teleconference on 9 March 2022. It was adjourned to give both parties an opportunity to provide me and each other with text messages, photographs and any other evidence or arrange for any witnesses they...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1589 APPLICANT AND COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT NL RESPONDENT AND COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT'S INSURER TJ Limited The Tribunal orders: NL is to pay $4,312.13 to TJ Limited by 16 August 2021. Reasons 1. On 22 April 2021 NL and EU were involved in a collision on [Road], [City]. 2. NL claim...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 90 APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay TL $625.00 by Wednesday 19 April 2023. Reasons 1. TL ordered a garment (lehenga) on 17 September 2022 from C Ltd which she wanted to wear for a cousin’s wedding in early December 2022 in [City 1]. She paid a 50% deposit of $625.00. She asked...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 596 APPLICANT SU RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. The counterclaim was withdrawn at the hearing. Reasons 1. The dispute concerns a large macrocarpa dining table that SU made approximately 25 years ago. SU is the father of KU. SU says the table was lent to KU approximately 5 years ago on the cond...
...response to COVID-19 (4 November 2021) When the aided person in Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings dies Reminder - Survey inviting PDLA lawyers to take part in the roster for the PDLA service over the holiday period now set to close on 8 November 2021 Applications sought from lawyers for legal aid provider selection committees Survey inviting PDLA lawyers to take part in the roster for the PDLA service over the holiday period now set to close on 8 November 2021 Update on Legal Aid Service...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 456 APPLICANT MX and YR RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. MX and YR contracted D Ltd to move their household goods from [City 1] to [City 2] in March/April 2023. 2. The terms of the written contract were that D Ltd would provide a 20ft container (of 38m3 volume) and a f...