Search Results

1. S Ltd v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 779 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...the sum payable by the buyer for collection costs. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 November 2023 1 [2003] BCL 677. 2 Nags Head Horse Hotel Ltd v Epsom Woods Ltd [2020] NZHC 2973 at para 43. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. FU v KT & G Ltd [2023] NZDT 431 (5 September 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...listed as [redacted]. 8. As the photo provided was not clear, I suggested to both parties that they may wish to provide a better copy, or other evidence to support their understanding of who the seller was. Neither party provided any further information on this at the second hearing. In the absence of any further evidence, I find that it is most probable that G Ltd is the seller of the vehicle, as its trade name and email address is legible in the area for sellers details, in the cont...

3. LG v DG [2023] NZDT 361 (31 July 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...satisfaction of the debt owed by DG. Conclusion 20. DG was obliged to pay LG $5,700 for the car. He has only paid $500 and so owes LG the balance of $5,200.00 Referee: S Simmonds Date: 31 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. T Ltd v M Ltd [2022] NZDT 191 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...19. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that the amount due is $5,750.00 including GST. The extra work done is offset by the incomplete job. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 20 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

5. KB v ZA [2024] NZDT 524 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...confident that the policy would cover the issue with this vehicle, up to the policy limit of $7,000.00. 5. This was a private sale. Purchasers have very few potential legal remedies in a private sale. The seller does not have a duty to provide any information to the buyer. The seller does not have to ensure that the vehicle is in good condition. The onus is on the buyer to satisfy themselves about the quality and fitness for purpose of the vehicle. 6. The only arguable basis for...

6. DI v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 684 (11 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...perpetual difficulty when a conversation is verbal and the parties have differing recollections. 11. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 11 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

7. ET & MT v LS & B Ltd [2024] NZDT 294 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...connection to and love of animals. 10. In conclusion, I find that LS is not liable to pay ET and MT any compensation and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 8 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. LM v S Ltd [2025] NZDT 86 (28 May 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...recognise that LM was denied the opportunity to choose whether or not she wanted to proceed with the process. I accordingly order payment of $100. K Edwards Disputes Tribunal Referee 28 May 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. HR v KD & J Ltd [2025] NZDT 223 (9 July 2025) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...that her insurer is entitled to be compensated for? 7. HR is entitled be compensated for all the reasonably foreseeable loss she incurred as a consequence of the dogs hitting into her vehicle. Her vehicle was assessed before the repairs were performed, and the repairs were found to be consistent with the cause of the collision. 8. KD wrote that he could not see how some of the marks could have been caused by his dogs hitting into the HR’s vehicle, as his dogs did not have collars...

10. LQ & SC Ltd v DD [2021] NZDT 1344 (31 March 2021) [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...and compensation and if so, how much. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Has there been a misrepresentation? 8. A misrepresentation is a statement of fact, made by one contracting party to another, before or at the time the contract was formed, upon which the purchaser relies, that proves to be wrong. If there has been a misrepresentation, the purchaser is entitled to a remedy, even if the misrepresentation was made innocently and not deliberately. 9. The onus lies with an...