Search Results

1. DU & HU c/- V Trust v UT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1591 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...disappointed with the length of time it took to receive UT’s quotation; the tradesperson did not let HU know when he arrived or left the Property during the installation; and the tradesperson did not admit to damaging the letterbox. 4. DU and HU claim $250.00 from UT for the cost of repairing the letterbox and the wall. At the hearing, DU and HU agreed to add payment of the invoice to the claim so that an order could be made that they pay the Outstanding Balance less any award of dam...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 123 Grocott t/a Fluffy's Roof Coatings v Parratt [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...Hearing: on the papers Appearances: Philippa Tucker, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 8 July 2013 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] In my judgment dated 22 February 2013. 1 I struck out the plaintiff’s claim for want of prosecution. This followed a failure by the plaintiff to comply with a direction to file amended pleadings and a failure to respond to an application by the defendant for an order striking out the proceeding. I reserved co...

3. Balatbat v Sparks [2016] NZIACDT 27 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...adviser was involved in the process until a complete set of documents arrived from the Philippines, ready to lodge with Immigration New Zealand. Mr Sparks reviewed the documents, certified he had assisted the complainant with recording the information on the application, and filed the papers with Immigration New Zealand. [3] The regulation of licensed immigration advisers is unusual; there is a prohibition on unlicensed persons providing immigration services. Some persons, such...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Arthurs [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...applications. First, Lyttelton Port Company Ltd applied to strike out a paragraph in the defendant’s statement of defence containing an affirmative defence. Second, Chris Arthurs has applied for disclosure of documents he says will be relevant to a claim of disparity of treatment. Both applications were opposed. Application to strike out [2] Lyttelton Port applied to strike out para 22.8 of Mr Arthurs’ statement of defence in which he raised an affirmative...

5. Kauikia-Stevens v Trustees of the Rangitatau 1D5A1 Block (2014) 318 Aotea MB 217 (318 AOT 217) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Section 18, 37 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rangitatau 1D 5A 1 Block BETWEEN AND AND DONATA KAREN TUREREAO KAUIKA- STEVENS Applicant CLARK MCVERRY TUREREAO KAUIKA- STEVENS Applicant TRUSTEES OF THE RANGITATAU 1D5A1 RESERVE Respondents Hearing: 301 Aotea MB 290 dated 23 April 2013 303 Aotea MB 31 dated 21 May 2013 306 Aotea MB 11 dated...

6. Rafiq v Commissioner of Police [2012] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 98 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 13 Reference No. HRRT 032/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Dr A Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child and Mr T Hallett-Hook for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 and 12 A...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 129 Maharaj v Wesley Wellington Mission Inc [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 129 [27 October 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 129 EMPC 110/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings BETWEEN ASHISH MAHARAJ Plaintiff AND WESLEY WELLINGTON MISSION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 7 September 2016 (heard at Wellington) Appearances: G Be...

8. LCRO 130/2016 RB v ZB (28 June 2017) [pdf, 229 KB]

   LCRO 130/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWTDN RB Applicant AND ZB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr RB has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee that no further action in respe...

9. RS v GT Limited [2019] NZDT 1398 (22 May 2019) [pdf, 230 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1398 APPLICANT RS RESPONDENT APPLICANT’S INSURER GT LIMITED B LIMITED The Tribunal hereby orders: GT Limited is to pay the sum of $1948.10 directly to B Limited on or before 12 June 2019. Reasons 1. In April 2018 RS was leaving work from [his workplace] when the barrier arm adjacent to the g...

10. TN v PO Ltd [2023] NZDT 570 (16 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 570 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT PO Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TN responded to a [online marketplace] listing for a Ps5 at a promo price of $450.00. The seller referred to themselves as PO Ltd. During a series of online interactions, and for a variety of reasons given by the seller, TN en...