Search Results

1. I Ltd v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 727 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 727 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd trading as ML must pay I Ltd $2,507.68 by 4pm on 22 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The parties rent their respective premises from the same landlord and share a power meter which is on I Ltd’s premises, meaning I Ltd is primarily responsible for the costs of the power. The...

2. EM v EN [2024] NZDT 395 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 88 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 395 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: EN is to pay the sum of $575.00 to EM by no later than 10 June 2024. Reasons: 1. EM claims she was driving on [road 1] when EN pulled out of a side road without giving way. EN’s vehicle collided with EM’s vehicle causing damage. EN left the scene without stopping and providin...

3. [2008] NZEmpC AC 15A/08 Potter v Australian Consolidated Press NZ Ltd [pdf, 29 KB]

   ...CONSOLIDATED PRESS NZ LTD AK AC 15A/08 3 July 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 15A/08 ARC 23/08 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN RICHARD RUSSELL POTTER Plaintiff AND AUSTRALIAN CONSOLIDATED PRESS NZ LTD Defendant Hearing: 15 May 2008 Subsequent affidavit filed on 29 May 2008 by the plaintiff and a...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 80 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...and/or cancel licences issued pursuant to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. The licences in question relate to the premises that were operated by the defendants which were places where breaches of employment standards took place. [10] The applicant believes that the present sale and purchase of each business (excluding Samra Brothers Ltd) and the subsequent new licence applications are a contrivance and an attempt to conceal the beneficiaries of the licence privilege. The appl...

5. BN v AW [2020] NZDT 1480 (8 October 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1480 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT AW The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BN owns the property on [street], Masterton. AW owns an adjoining property at [street], Masterton. Nobody lives in AW’s house on [street], but until recently, the property was used by AW’s brother to store various item...

6. [2018] NZEmpC 63 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 342 KB]

   ...claimed would be inappropriate. [35] I accordingly dismiss this challenge. Mr Lorigan’s application of 13 March 2018 requesting this Court to “jointly and severally order and compel the defeat, muting and removal of the defendant’s invalid claims of legal professional privilege/s” [36] Mr Lorigan filed a memorandum asserting that Infinity’s claim for legal professional privilege is invalid. 12 Yu v Zespri International L...

7. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 4451 [2013] NZCOP 15 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND Applicant (Rights Owner) AND TELECOM NZ 4451 Respondents BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL WARWICK SMITH HEARING ON THE PAPERS DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application by Recording Industry Association of New Zealand Incorporated (“the Applicant”) for an order under s.122O of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (“the Act”). The Applicant seeks an order for payment...

8. Okaia Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 22 [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...provides that a claimant may apply to the chair seeking a review of a decision that his or her claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the chief executive’s decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. The eligibility criteria for this claim are set out in section 16 of the Act. [5] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review:...

9. AGO v ZVE [2013] NZDT 371 (12 December 2013) [pdf, 68 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 371 BETWEEN AGO APPLICANT AND ZVE RESPONDENT Date of Order: 12 December 2013 Referee: Referee Blyth ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that AGO’s claim be dismissed. Facts [1] The material facts are that AGO became a flatmate of ZVE in June 2013. AGO left in late August 2013. AGO claims that ZVE owes her a refund of $180.00, being on...

10. LCRO 229/2015 ZM v BM, VJ, FR and XS QC [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...records. [4] That request was made pursuant to s 147 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [5] That section is commonly relied on by a Standards Committee when it decides, in the course of a conduct inquiry, that it requires further information from the lawyer who is the subject of their investigation. 2 [6] Mr ZM did not comply with the s 147 request. [7] Charges were laid with the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal). [8...