Search Results

1. [2017] EmpC 41 Cronin-Lampe and anor v BOT of Melville High School [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...[2017] NZEmpC 41 ARC 55/13 ARC 79/13 ARC 25/14 ARC 48/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of applications for leave to raise personal grievances out of time and pursuant to s 4(7) Limitation Act 1950 to bring proceedings BETWEEN KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE First Plaintiff AND RONALD CRONIN-LAMPE Second Plaintiff

2. N Ltd v K Ltd [2021] NZDT 1559 (8 September 2021) [pdf, 94 KB]

   Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1559 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay $2,190.00 to N Ltd on or before 30 September 2021. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On 20 June 2021, N Ltd purchased a 2015 14 seater Toyota Hiace Van with a Certificate of Fitness (COF) for $42,000 from K Ltd. N Ltd made the purchase sight-unseen and relied...

3. DM & IW v HD [2022] NZDT 44 (2 May 2022) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...that appeared to be required. DM and IW filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal. 2. This is a claim for breach of the guarantee that services are to be provided with reasonable care and skill, as set out in the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993. The Applicants estimated that the repairs would cost about $38,000.00 plus GST, and they claimed the maximum claimable in the Tribunal, $30,000.00. 3. The issues to be determined were as follows: a. Has HD completed the work to the required...

4. Sawyer v Victoria University of Wellington (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 47 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...Dr NR Swain, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr CA Sawyer in person Ms M Scholtens KC and Mr G Davenport for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 25 September 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 [1] Dr Sawyer was employed as a law lecturer by Victoria University of Wellington (VUW). In August 2016, following an employment dispute, Dr Sawyer filed a claim that alleged VUW had breached a range of information privacy princi...

5. [2020] NZSSAA 18 (30 October 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...supervision substantially in excess of that normally required by a child of the same age and sex; or (c) regular supervision from another person in order to avoid substantial danger to himself or others. [12] Section 11D of the Act set out the application process for benefits. Section 11D(1) states that a benefit must not be granted until an applicant has complied with s 11D(2) which requires an application form and any supporting evidence reasonably required by the Chief Executive...

6. DN v WM Ltd & FN Ltd [2023] NZDT 785 (10 November 2023) [pdf, 85 KB]

   Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 785 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT 2nd RESPONDENT WM Ltd FN Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. The matter had been adjourned after the last hearing for the parties to consider a settlement. That did not occur, and I am now making a determination. 3. DN (‘the applicant’)...

7. TN v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 649 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 649 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TN owns a [vehicle]. 2. In 2022 the vehicle suffered an engine failure. K Ltd re-built the engine for TN. The job cost $14,012.97 and was completed in October 2022. 3. TN had re-located to [country] for work. He asked his frie...

8. UJ v TV [2023] NZDT 429 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 429 APPLICANT UJ RESPONDENT TV The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons: 1. UJ purchased a used car from TV. The car was advertised on [the Internet], and UJ messaged TV about it. They arranged a time to view the car, and UJ’s wife went, and test drove the car. UJ then purchased the car. Shortly afterw...

9. QT v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 23 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

10. TX v QC Ltd [2023] NZDT 94 (22 March 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 94 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT QC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In January 2022, TX purchased a used car from QC Ltd. In August 2022, it broke down and had to be towed to TX’s home. An ECU fault was diagnosed. TX was told that the pins had corroded causing the fault, and that the corro...