Search Results

1. Kauikia-Stevens v Trustees of the Rangitatau 1D5A1 Block (2014) 318 Aotea MB 217 (318 AOT 217) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Section 18, 37 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rangitatau 1D 5A 1 Block BETWEEN AND AND DONATA KAREN TUREREAO KAUIKA- STEVENS Applicant CLARK MCVERRY TUREREAO KAUIKA- STEVENS Applicant TRUSTEES OF THE RANGITATAU 1D5A1 RESERVE Respondents Hearing: 301 Aotea MB 290 dated 23 April 2013 303 Aotea MB 31 dated 21 May 2013 306 Aotea MB 11 dated...

2. ACV v ZXE [2013] NZDT 213 (26 August 2013) [pdf, 46 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 213 BETWEEN ACV APPLICANT AND ZXE Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 26 August 2013 Referee: Referee Brown ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] ACV engaged ZXE Ltd to move his household belongings including his Ducati motorbike. When the truck was unpacked at his new home, the fairing, right hand mirror and both back blinkers w...

3. Options for resolving remaining Canterbury earthquakes insurance disputes [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...arbitration tribunal. We recommend you discuss these options, and potential funding for them through Budget 2018, with your Ministerial colleagues and advise us of your preferred approach. Executive summary 3. Most Canterbury earthquake insurance claims have been settled using existing legal processes and dispute resolution schemes. Processes for settling claims, and resolving insurance disputes, have evolved since the earthquakes to deal with an unprecedented number of claims....

4. ST v Council [2022] NZDT 9 (24 March 2022) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 9 APPLICANT ST RESPONDENT Council The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) On 15 December 2021 a tree on a front verge [land owned by the respondent] fell on to the applicant’s car, which was parked on the street. ST says that “upon falling, the roots...

5. HT v BM [2024] NZDT 711 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 711 APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT BM The Tribunal orders: A. BM is pay HT $1,050.00 on or before 11 September 2024. B. BM is entitled to take the washing machine from HT’s property at a reasonably agreed time after the above payment is made to HT, and not before. If payment is not made by 11 September 2024, the ownership of the washing mac...

6. [2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Arthurs [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...applications. First, Lyttelton Port Company Ltd applied to strike out a paragraph in the defendant’s statement of defence containing an affirmative defence. Second, Chris Arthurs has applied for disclosure of documents he says will be relevant to a claim of disparity of treatment. Both applications were opposed. Application to strike out [2] Lyttelton Port applied to strike out para 22.8 of Mr Arthurs’ statement of defence in which he raised an affirmative...

7. Rafiq v Commissioner of Police [2012] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 98 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 13 Reference No. HRRT 032/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Dr A Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child and Mr T Hallett-Hook for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 and 12 A...

8. R v D LCRO 56 / 2009 (19 June 2009) - Rehearing Decision [pdf, 74 KB]

   LCRO 56 /09 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Standards Committee BETWEEN COMPLAINANT R of Whangamata Applicant AND LAWYER D of Auckland Respondent DECISION Introduction [1] Lawyer D has, through his counsel, Mr XX, raised concerns about the LCRO’s procedures in relation to a decision issued on 19 June 2009. [2...

9. LCRO 130/2016 RB v ZB (28 June 2017) [pdf, 229 KB]

   LCRO 130/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWTDN RB Applicant AND ZB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr RB has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee that no further action in respe...

10. KA v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 126 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 126 APPLICANT KA RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. KA is to pay L Ltd $115.00 by 13 February 2024. 2. The claim by KA is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In April 2023, L Ltd inspected a heat pump at KA’s rental property. L Ltd recommended that the heat pump be replaced. KA alleges that this advice was fraudulent and claims compensati...