12549 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1332 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT MF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms F signed up online to complete a course of weekly online business coaching with Mr N. The sessions were one hour, and cost $99.00 each. 2. On 10 November 2019, Ms F advised that she wished to terminate the coaching serv...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 472 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT EL The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Introduction: Reasons: 1. T Ltd had filed a previous application with the Disputes Tribunal being [file number]. Under this application V Ltd was ordered to pay T Ltd for an outstanding debt. 2. V Ltd went into liquidation...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 292 APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay OX $334.99 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. OX purchased a pair of [headphones] from [retail store] on 19 October 2019 for $334.99. 2. In late 2022-early 2023, OX noticed that the right earbud kept dyin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 161 APPLICANT DE and KE T/A D&K Rentals RESPONDENT TL The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the applicant has been corrected to the names of the partners t/a D&K Rentals 2. TL is to pay $13,417.14 to DE and KE t/a D&K Rentals on or before 14 October 2022. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 3. On 14 Marc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 310 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT NX The Tribunal orders: NX is to pay BI the sum of $23,000.00 on or before 12 June 2024. Reasons: 1. On 14 January 2024 NX was driving on [road]. She was distracted by a friend in her car who was crying. This caused NX to collide with a parked car on the side of the road. 2. The parked car was owned...
...September 2009. 245 Aotea MB 125 [3] The issues for consideration are whether it is still appropriate to grant an injunction as sought, whether the Board has acted in contempt and whether costs are now properly payable. Background [4] By application received on 24 July 2009 the Animal Health Board requested the Registrar to convene meetings of beneficial owners for Mangahouhou 1, Oraukura 1, Waihi Kahakaharoa 8A, 8B and Waipapa 2B 2A. The purpose of the proposed meetin...
...Walter Paterson, Tom Smiler, Rawinia Paterson, Daniel Paterson. 10. The Court was later notified that Tangiwai Campbell (holding 174.661 shares) wanted her son and the lessee, Isaac Campbell, to be her spokesperson during the hearing. He claimed she opposed the application. It was claimed that Mark Hemotu Campbell also objected. Opposition to the application was also informally received by way of phone calls from Margaret Henry (87.3305 shares), Tom Campbell (87.3305 share...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 438 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by Q Ltd is dismissed. 2. BH Ltd is added as the respondent. Reasons: 1. B Ltd is the trading name of BH Ltd (referred to in this decision as B Ltd). 2. On 10 January 2023, Q Ltd provided two specialist driver training courses, one for UE and the other for...
...[6] Mr Nathan is seeking costs for the proceeding that led to the October judgment of $25,300 including GST. That is the amount of the costs actually incurred by him. In addition, disbursements amounting to $694.05 are sought. A further $1,000 is claimed for preparing the application for costs. 1 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 135, (2016) 10 NZELC 79-070. 2 Nathan v Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd [2015...
...circumstances [5] The proceedings against PwC under the Privacy Act [14] The interlocutory applications filed by Ms Guo [15] PWC – THE DISCOVERY APPLICATION [21] The Tribunal’s power to order discovery [21] Pleadings – the statement of claim [25] Pleadings – the statement of reply [27] Assessment – the issues which will determine the scope of discovery [28] Whether formal discovery should be ordered [32] Reasons for formal discovery being ordered [36] Use of discov...