Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12549 items matching your search terms

  1. LN v JH Ltd [2022] NZDT 16 (18 February 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 16 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT JH Ltd The Tribunal orders: JH Ltd is to pay the sum of $22.00 to LN on or before 11 March 2022. Reasons: 1. On 28 May 2021, LN and his wife travelled from [City A] to [City B] on a bus, having purchased tickets from the JH Ltd. LN was very unhappy with the service, and now claims a refund o...

  2. Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...Hickey, MNZM Member Ms S Isaacs, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr CJ Tennet for plaintiff No appearance for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 2 February 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CLAIM1 [1] Ms Boyd filed a statement of claim in the Tribunal on 21 August 2020. Ms Boyd alleges Legacy Church and Legacy Housing interfered with her privacy by failing to fulfil her October 2019 information privacy request in breach o...

  3. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

    ...Plan 3020 and Section 2 Survey Office Plan 339948 and Others (Shelly Bay) I WAENGA I A Between MIKE TE WHAREHURU GILBERT, MARTHA HINEONE GLIBERT, KAREN MARAMA PARATA, MABEL URU TANIRAU AND ROGAN RAWIRI HAHOPE TANIRAU Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearings 6 August 2021, 441 Aotea MB 117-146 (Heard at Wellington) 31 January 2023, 461 Aotea MB 49 Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment date C Hockly for Applicants T Cooley for Firs...

  4. ET & HT v SX [2024] NZDT 139 (16 March 2024) [pdf, 229 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 139 APPLICANT ET APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT SX The Tribunal orders: SX is to pay $5,979.88 to ET and HT by the 8th April 2024. Reasons 1. ET and HT purchased [dog], a [pedigree breed] bitch from SX for breeding purposes in late 2019 for a price of $3000. Two years later following the observation of health issues after [dog

  5. C Ltd v HN [2023] NZDT 451 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 451 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT HN The Tribunal orders: HN is to pay C Ltd $2060.00 on or before the 25th day of July 2023. Reasons: Introduction: 1. C Ltd entered into a contract via a contra agreement with HN around the 15th day of November 2022. C Ltd was to paint a stock car belonging to HN free of charge and...

  6. N v Letalu [2015] NZIACDT 41 (16 April 2015) [pdf, 139 KB]

    ...complainants to apply for visas. At the time they were in New Zealand unlawfully, as their visas had expired some years before. Mr Letalu agreed to apply under a discretionary provision for visas. The allegations are that he: [2.1] Failed to lodge the request promptly, and then lodged an unsatisfactory request. [2.2] He charged too much for the work he did. [2.3] He issued an invoice, which had the wrong GST rate, and double charged GST. [2.4] He failed to tell his clients when the re...

  7. W Ltd v NC [2022] NZDT 210 (24 November 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 210 APPLICANT W Ltd RESPONDENT NC APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay $13,650.00 to J Ltd by 8 December 2022. Reasons 1. On 19 January 2022, W Ltd and NC were involved in a collision at [Address]. 2. J Ltd claims $18,203.62 for the cost of towing and repairing the vehicle W Ltd was d...

  8. KG v SQ & vehicle testing company [2022] NZDT 125 (4 August 2022) [pdf, 194 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 125 APPLICANT APPLICANT'S INSURER KG [Applicant’s Insurer] FIRST RESPONDENT SQ SECOND RESPONDENT [Vehicle testing company] The Tribunal orders: SQ and [vehicle testing company] are to pay [Applicant’s insurer] $4,840.74 by 18 August 2022. Reasons: 1. On 3 July 2019, a motor...

  9. What happens next

    This diagram shows the process a claim goes through, from application to outcome. You can find a more detailed explanation of the Tribunal process later in this section and in the Homeowners' Guide (link below). Things to note: We'll let you know when your claim has been received. This is does not mean your claim has been accepted. You and your insurer can reach a settlement at any stage in the process. At each stage in the process, you’ll be kept informed of the next steps and what you need...

  10. SX v Q Ltd & TX [2024] NZDT 112 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 112 APPLICANT SX 1st RESPONDENT Q Ltd 2nd RESPONDENT TX The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd and/or TX, jointly and severally, shall pay SX $15,071.61 by 4 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 30 April 2016, SX contracted Q Ltd to manage his rental property whilst SX is residing overseas. TX is the sole director of Q Ltd. 2. No issue...