12549 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 420 APPLICANT KH RESPONDEN T N Ltd The Tribunal orders: KH is to pay N Ltd the sum of $18,711.24 within 21 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. The applicant contracted the respondent to transport a mobile home from [City 1] in the [Country] to [City 2] (“the freight service”). 2. The respondent invoiced the applic...
Legal Services Commissioner Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street I DX SX10125 I Wellington lsc@justice.govt.nz 2 May 2024 Our ref: OIA 111056 Tēnā koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Legal Aid Provider Assignments Thank you for your request to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) on 2 April 2024. Specifically, you requested: 1. Between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024, how many Whangarei-based...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 24 June 2024 Our ref: OIA 112465 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Waitangi Tribunal I refer to your email of 18 May 2024 to the Prime Minister, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon, requesting information relating to the Waitangi Tribunal (the Tribunal). On 20 May 2024, your request was transferred to the Minister of Justice, Hon Paul...
...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 35 EMPC 307/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for orders for supplementary affidavit BETWEEN TITIIMAEA EUGENE ELISARA Plaintiff AND ALLIANZ NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Kiely and S Worthy, co...
...file. [3] That request was made pursuant to s 147 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [4] That section is commonly relied on by a Standards Committee when it decides, in the course of a conduct inquiry, that it requires further information from the practitioner. [5] Mr ZM did not comply with the s 147 request. 2 [6] In due course, charges were laid with the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal). [7] One of the charges was...
...cancelling roadway and laying out new roadway made at 5 Tākitimu MB 239-247 on 12 November 2010 and made at 40 Tākitimu MB 16-18 on 6 May 2015 KOHINE RATA, PHILLIP HUTANA, LILY WILCOX and HENARE HUTANA Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 9 December 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1493-1518 (Heard at Hastings) Whakataunga: Judgment date 7 February 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA TUARUA C L FOX Judgment of De...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 394 APPLICANT EQ RESPONDENT FI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Respondent party is corrected to be FI Ltd. The claim by EQ is dismissed. Reasons 1. EQ filed a claim for the cost of a second set of car keys against HU, a salesman at FI Ltd. At the hearing, it was agreed that FI Ltd was the correct respondent party...
...adjourned as B Ltd (represented by OT) were awaiting confirmation from [airline] (via SI’s travel agent) of any refund due to SI for cancelled flights ([City 2] to [City 3] to [City 4]). B Ltd confirmed their intention to refund SI’s portion of the claim less any refund from [airline]. They do not consider that NI’s portion of the claim is within the scope of the policy. 3. At the resumed hearing, SI confirmed that he has accepted the offer of $12,554.65 from B Ltd in respect o...
...[2015] NZEmpC 175 [5 October 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 175 EMPC 217/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN ABLE OWL XL LIMITED Plaintiff AND NEIL GLADDEN Defendant Hearing: By costs memoranda filed on 30 September and 2 October 2015 Appearances: E Burke, counsel for plaintiff N...
...other kind of tort or in contract or on any other basis whatsoever for any consequential or indirect loss whatsoever arising from or in connection with any loss or damage to the goods. 40. OW Ltd have excluded liability for the consequential losses claimed by NQ. 41. The CGA cannot be contracted out of and OW Ltd would remain liable for foreseeable consequential losses arising out of its breach of the CGA as found by the Tribunal. However, the losses claimed by NQ were consequen...