Search Results

Search results for claim form.

13020 items matching your search terms

  1. Peita - Motatau 3H2[2019]Chief Judge's MB 337 (2019 CJ 337) [pdf, 362 KB]

    ...MB 337 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20150003204 CJ 2015/24 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Motatau 3H2 Block BETWEEN ALLAN SHANE PEITA Applicant Hearing: 11 December 2018, 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 1029 - 1043 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 30 April 2019 JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2019 Chi...

  2. WO v KU [2021] NZDT 1676 (20 December 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1676 APPLICANT WO RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: WO’s claim against KU is dismissed. Reasons 1. WO and KU met in December 2018 and commenced a romantic relationship. On 28 March 2019 they started living together in a de facto relationship. Whilst living together, they shared their daily financial responsibilit...

  3. TT v BQ [2023] NZDT 138 (4 April 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 138 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: BQ is to pay TT $6,539.00 within 28 days. [1] BQ engaged TT to do the electrical work for a house in [Suburb 1] which he, BQ, was building for himself. A dispute arose between the parties, and TT did not complete the work. TT’s claim is for $9,585.00, the value of the wor...

  4. Taylor v Corrections (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 45 [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION: 20 October 2020 DATE OF DECISION OF COSTS: 24 November 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 [1] The Tribunal by decision in Taylor v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 42 struck out Mr Taylor’s claim. Mr Taylor had failed to file any evidence and the claim was struck out as an abuse of process. [2] On 6 November 2020 the Department of Corrections (Corrections) filed an applica...

  5. Body Corporate 85760 Acme Apartments [2011] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 86 KB]

    1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 4 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6368: BODY CORPORATE 85760 - ACME APARTMENTS, 6 HALLEY LANE, WELLINGTON ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Body Corporate 85760 is the representative for a multi unit complex known as Acme Apartments at 6...

  6. IJ v SO LCRO 76 / 2011 (15 February 2012) [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...had been withdrawn, and the Court made appointments in favour of another person who had been proposed by the Applicant. [9] The Applicant was much offended by the allegations against him, particularly those involving financial matters. He claimed to have had incurred 3 significant legal expenses in respect of court applications which he noted were not successful in the event, contending that it was known to the Practitioner to have no prospect of success, adding that it...

  7. Ratahi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Section 53 Block IX Opunake SD being part Ngati Kahumate Block comprised in CT D4/240 (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

    ...February 2006. Mr Lawrence counsel for a number of respondents wrote to Mr Bulfin on 9 November 2005 raising the issue of jurisdiction but received no reply he says. The matter was set down for hearing on 24 February 2006 but was adjourned at the request of Mrs Hughes QC, counsel for the applicants in the instant case (the respondents in the substantive proceeding) who said she needed time to prepare and to brief rebuttal evidence. The substantive hearing occurred on 16 June 2006 wh...

  8. [2019] NZLVT 002 The Trustees of the Jiong Swee Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    IBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC OO.;t of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for costs by s 274 parties under s 285 of the Act AB LOGISTICS LIMITED (ENV-201-AKL-171) Appellant NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent COCAVO LIMITED, ELEVATE HEALTH AND FITNESS LIMITED, CONNECT, NZ COURIERS LIMITED, PERFORMA LINK, POST HASTE LIMITED, SURPLUS DIRECT LIMITED...

  9. HU & DU v I Ltd & CJ Ltd [2024] NZDT 598 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 232 KB]

    ...the vehicle that have different circumferences cause strain on AWD system and can lead to failure of the AWD (transmission) system. HU and DU were unaware it was necessary to replace all four tyres when any tyre need to be replaced. They have requested the Tribunal to order compensation from I Ltd and CJ Ltd. Did I Ltd mislead the applicants regarding replacement tyres for the AWD vehicle? 2. Section 10 of the Fair Trading Act 1986 provides that “no person shall, in trade, e...

  10. [2023] NZREADT 35 - UM v REAA (CAC 2103) (13 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...appellant: Self-represented Counsel for the first respondent: M Mortimer-Wang, A Stuart Counsel for the second respondent: R M Stewart, R H Anderson The third respondent: No appearance SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDER RULING (Applications for publication and non-publication orders) Dated 13 December 2023 2 INTRODUCTION [1] This matter concerns a complaint by UM, the appellant, against Ned Gow, a licensed salesperson under the Real Estate Agents Ac...