12864 items matching your search terms
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2021-100-002 BETWEEN HELEN BERNADETTE O’SULLIVAN, FIONA CHERIE WHITE & ANDREW RODGER WILTON as trustees of the WILTON FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND DEANE FLUIT BUILDER LTD First Respondent AND TAB DESIGN LTD (Removed) Second Respondent AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 663 APPLICANT UN RESPONDENT CD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT CD The Tribunal orders: UN’s claims against CD Ltd, and CD is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2015, UN engaged the services of CD Ltd to survey his property at [address] for a subdivision. On 17 April 2019, CD Ltd invoiced UN $11,715.63 for the survey fees including $2...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 615 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT UI APPLICANT'S INSURER X Insurance The Tribunal orders: UI is to pay $8,588.44 to X Insurance on or before 5.00pm on 11 December 2023. Reasons 1. EC was driving north on [Street] which has two lanes in each direction separated by a median. Soon after he passed the entrance to [Landmark]...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 567 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay I Ltd $30,000.00 on or before 3 September 2024. 2. The counterclaim by Q Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. Q Ltd took its [vehicle] to I Ltd on 2 May 2023 for a Certificate of Fitness (COF). I Ltd inspected the [vehicle] and found a coolant leak. Q Ltd gave the...
...state that 4 weeks’ notice of termination of a locum agreement is standard industry practice. 4. NQ says that locum agreements can vary and that he considers one week’s notice to be sufficient particularly given that the contract had only been formed the day before. In fact, 6 days’ notice was provided, given the repudiation occurred at 7.21pm on the Tuesday night and BN was to work the following Tuesday. 5. I find that because a binding contract was formed a week prior to...
...minimum, innocent on the balance of probabilities. Cabinet guidelines Cabinet has established guidelines for deciding whether or not someone receives compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment and how much compensation they receive. Eligible claimants must be imprisoned, and subsequently pardoned or convictions quashed The Cabinet guidelines require claimants to: be alive at the time of application have served all or part of a sentence of imprisonment have received a f...
...innocent on the balance of probabilities. Cabinet guidelines Cabinet has established guidelines for deciding whether or not someone receives compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment and how much compensation they receive. Eligible claimants must be imprisoned, and subsequently pardoned or convictions quashed The Cabinet guidelines require claimants to: be alive at the time of application have served all or part of a sentence of imprisonment have received a f...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 479 APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT T Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd RESPONDENT'S INSURER Y Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd, or its insurer Y Ltd, shall pay the Applicant $4,700.00 by 27 July 2023. Reasons: 1. The Applicant’s vehicle was damaged beyond economical repair in a collision wit...
LCRO 97/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 4 BETWEEN CM of Auckland Applicant AND XH of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] Complaints were made by Mr CM (the Applicant) against Mr XH (the Practitioner) who ac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1436 APPLICANT T Limited RESPONDENT E J The Tribunal hereby orders: T Limited’s claim against E J is dismissed. Reasons 1. In January 2019, T Limited provided labour and machinery to Mr E J for a job at his property in [City A]. T Limited invoiced Mr J for $4,740.40. This included the provision of 11 staff...