Search Results

1. MH & YH as Trustees of MH Family Trust v W Ltd & OK [2024] NZDT 509 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 153 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 509 APPLICANT MH and YH as Trustees of the MH Family Trust FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT W Ltd SK The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: MH and YH as Trustees of the MH Family Trust are jointly and severally liable to pay $13,305.05 to W Ltd on or before 4 June 2024. Reasons 1. W Ltd...

2. [2022] NZIACDT 1 - ZI v Wan (19 January 2022) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...already in New Zealand on a visitor visa granted on the basis of guardianship of her younger son (her son), who was here on a student visa. This required her to remain in New Zealand while her son was here. An exemption to that condition was requested by Mr Wan to permit her to travel to China without him. It was declined by Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ), but Mr Wan did not tell her. She duly travelled to China, in breach of her visa. [2] A complaint was made to the I...

3. LCRO 138/2015 AZ, VY and CX v DW and EV [pdf, 260 KB]

   LCRO 138/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AZ, BY and CX Applicants AND DW and EV Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr GT lodged a complaint on behalf of his clients (the respondents) against HS & I...

4. 2024-07-22-Notice-of-Hearing-QAC-v-RPL.pdf [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...may vacate the hearing. If settlement is reached prior to the hearing, please notify the Court immediately. 1. SCHEDULING AND HEARING FEES The scheduling fee is incurred when the proceeding is scheduled for a substantive hearing or any other application or proceeding (apart from an interlocutory application). The scheduling fee is not refundable if the hearing is no longer required. The party bringing the proceeding is liable to pay hearing fees. • For interlocutory applicati...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 116 Horton Media Ltd v Tither [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...LAURENCE TITHER NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 116 [20 July 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 116 ARC 44/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order and ancillary orders BETWEEN HORTON MEDIA LIMITED Applicant AND NORAH LAURENCE TITHER Respondent Hearing: 19 July 2012 (by telephone) and memoranda filed on 19 and 20 July 2012 Appearances: Stephen Langton, counsel for applicant Charlotte Parkhill, counsel for responde...

6. Options for resolving remaining Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance disputes [pdf, 384 KB]

   ...arbitration tribunal. We recommend you discuss these options, and potential funding for them through Budget 2018, with your Ministerial colleagues and advise us of your preferred approach. Executive summary 3. Most Canterbury earthquake insurance claims have been settled using existing legal processes and dispute resolution schemes. Processes for settling claims, and resolving insurance disputes, have evolved since the earthquakes to deal with an unprecedented number of claims....

7. BC v SL & XB Ltd [2023] NZDT 568 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 568 APPLICANT BC FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT SL XB Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed against both respondents. Reasons 1. In late May 2023 BC approached SL of XB Ltd to replace the thermostat in her car after she was told by another workshop that was the cause of her car overheating. BC paid X...

8. HA v Z Ltd [2023] NZDT 288 (17 July 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 288 APPLICANT HA RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay HA $900.00 by 5 August 2023 Background 1. In February 202,1 HA obtained a healthy homes assessment report for a rental property in [Suburb]. 2. The front page of the report has the Z Ltd logo and it states “prepared by [Z Ltd]”. 3....

9. QF Ltd v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 664 (28 September 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 664 APPLICANT QF Ltd RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: I Ltd is to pay QF Ltd the sum of $776.89 on or before 19 October 2023. Reasons: 1. I Ltd engaged QF Ltd to do some work on the hydraulic hoses for a truck. The work was carried out, but the truck not tested as there were also other tradespeople working on the electrics of...

10. PI v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 745 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 745 APPLICANT PI RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. PI purchased [a spa] from B Ltd on 15 May 2020. The purchase price was $11,995. 2. On or around July 2024, PI says a fault occurred with spa and it stopped heating the water. He contacted B Ltd for repairs and was advised that the spa was...