Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12549 items matching your search terms

  1. QC v KN [2023] NZDT 426 (10 July 2023) [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 426 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: 1. KN is to pay QC $800.00 on or before 01 August 2023. 2. The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In or around early June 2022 QC and KN began discussing a room that was available in KN’s flat to be sub leased to QC. On 3 July 2022 they entered into a Tenant/ Sublettee agreement which set...

  2. NC v GT Limited [2024] NZDT 39 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 210 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 39 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT GT Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. GT Limited (GT) recently ran a promotion where it gave away stickers for a particular dollar spend, and when a consumer had collected a specific number of stickers, they could exchange these for free [kitchenware]. 2. GT ran out of...

  3. QN v HO B Ltd [2023] NZDT 236 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 227 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 236 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT HO APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: HO is to pay the sum of $1,060.00 to B Ltd on or before Monday, 12 June 2023. REASONS 1. QN owns a rental property at [address 1] (“the Property”). There was previously...

  4. Beattie v Porirua City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 14 [pdf, 41 KB]

    ...File No: TRI 2010-101-000009/ DBH 06006 Citation: [2010] NZWHT Wellington 14 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 14 May 2010 Background Pursuant to sections 72 and 73 of the WHRS Act 2006, the Tribunal heard and determined the claim against the sixth respondent, Ms Donaldson separately. Ms Donaldson did not pursue a removal application as it was unlikely to succeed due to the requirements for removal outlined in Fenton v Building Code Consultants Ltd. Claim again...

  5. Carley (INZ) v Kim [2015] NZIACDT 47 (7 May 2015) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...Introduction [1] The Registrar of the Immigration Advisers Authority referred this complaint to the Tribunal. [2] Immigration New Zealand made the complaint, on the grounds Ms Kim as a licensed immigration adviser: [2.1] Lodged visitor visa applications, treating them as though they were work visa applications. [2.2] She arranged for an unlicensed person to provide immigration services in breach of the legislation regulating licensed immigration advisers. [2.3] She failed to mai...

  6. EJ v UQ Ltd [2015] NZDT 834 (29 September 2015) [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...time the Jeep was covered by the balance of a 3 year manufacturer’s warranty which expired in July 2012. [2] UQ Ltd is the local authorised service repair centre for Jeep. Between 2010 and 2012, at EJ’s request, UQ Ltd carried out 27 warranty claims to the value of $30,000 without cost to him. [3] In November 2014 EJ filed a claim for $10,887.51 from UQ LTd. EJ is unhappy with two of the repairs undertaken in 2012 by UQ Ltd (to the front differential housing and the electrical...

  7. BX v PN Ltd & NN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1575 (5 August 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1575 APPLICANT BX RESPONDENT PN Limited SECOND RESPONDENT NN Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In March 2020 BX purchased a [Brand] inflatable boat from NN Ltd (agents for [Brand]). 2. In January 2021 BX experienced an issue with the boat while using it in the [Location] Ha...

  8. UV v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 618 (28 November 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 618 APPLICANT UW RESPONDENT B Ltd G The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay UW the total sum of $2000.00 on or before Tuesday 19 December 2023. Reasons: 1. On 11 December 2023 UW arrived in Auckland from her flight from [City] flying G, operated by B Ltd. But her stroller which had been checked in did not arrive. Instead, she says it was...

  9. [2015] NZEmpC 97 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 97 [24 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 97 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for 'unless' orders BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 20 and 30 March and...

  10. [2013] NZEmpC 142 Air NZ Ltd v Kerr [pdf, 52 KB]

    ...NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 142 [29 July 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 142 ARC 38/13 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for disclosure and leave to file an amended statement of claim BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND GRANT KERR Defendant Hearing: (by way of telephone directions conference held on 29 July...