Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 046 Save the Maitai Incorporated v Nelson City Council [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...case event: 23 February 2023 Date of Decision: 15 March 2023 Date of Issue: 15 March 2023 - ., • , <C' .. ~- ~ 7cou~ 2 _______________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON APPLICATION FOR WITNESS SUMMONS _______________________________________________________________ A: The application for witness summons is granted. REASONS Introduction [1] This decision is in respect of an application for witness summo...

2. SM v UU Ltd [2022] NZDT 159 (15 December 2022) [pdf, 159 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 159 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT UU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by telephone. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The hearing was adjourned to allow SM to contact his insurer. SM has done so and reports that an insurance assessor has visited the propert...

3. YM v DD Ltd [2024] NZDT 54 (26 January 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

4. FH v TI Ltd [2023] NZDT 263 (29 May 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 263 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT TI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant’s name is changed to FH. 2. TI Ltd is to pay the sum of $2,975.00 to FH on or before Monday 19 June 2023. Reasons: 1. In June 2022, the [netball team] manager for FH, UN, booked accommodation for the team and coaches from 28 August to 2...

5. DG & J Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 327 (23 April 2024) [pdf, 89 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 327 APPLICANT DG RESPONDENT BM APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BM is to pay $4,224.10 to J Ltd on or before 12 May 2024. REASONS 1. On 28 October 2023 DG had attended the speedway in [Town]. Upon leaving, DG drove along the gravel road leading from the speedway track to the intersection...

6. Black & Anor as Trustees for Lyn Black Family Trust v KW & KR Gutsell Building Ltd [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Industries Ltd 36 7. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE 37 7.8 BETTERMENT 41 8. CONTRIBUTION BETWEEN PARTIES 43 9. COSTS 47 10. ORDERS 48 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On 9 January 2003 the Claimant made application to the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service (“WHRS”) under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 (the Act) in respect of their property at 5A Kepler Place, Te Anau. * correction made 26.9.2006 2 Claim 6...

7. 24 unit owners of Shed 24 Princess Wharf, 143 Quay Street [2013] NZWHT Auckland 13 [pdf, 89 KB]

   1 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 13 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6990 to 7013: 24 unit owners of Shed 24 Princess Wharf, 143 Quay Street ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Shed 24, Princess Wharf is a nine level apartment complex constructed on the outer north west area of...

8. FP v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 635 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 635 APPLICANT FP RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay FP $4,132.00 on or before 6 December 2023. Reasons Introduction 1. In November 2022 T Ltd prepared and laid lawn seed at FP’s house. 2. FP claims $4,132.00 being the price paid for the preparation and laying of the lawn. 3. The issues to be resolved are:...

9. Sharma v Manchanda [2018] NZIACDT 9 (23 March 2018) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...The application Mr Manchanda prepared was a failed lodgement with Immigration New Zealand (INZ), due to the absence of a current police certificate; [2.2] At that point, the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and had limited options to request a visa, as generally a person who is in New Zealand without a current visa cannot apply for a visa; and [2.3] When the complaint was made, the Registrar required that Mr Manchanda provide a copy of his file, but he did not provide f...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 39 - IK v Tian (23 September 2020) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...New Zealand and had to leave, otherwise he was liable for deportation. [13] As Ms Tian did not inform the complainant of the outcome of the application or its immigration consequences, he continued to text or telephone her seeking news of the applications. She continued her practice of claiming not to know. [14] The complainant engaged his present counsel, Ms Mitchell, in January 2019. She contacted Immigration New Zealand and was informed of the decline of the complainant’s v...