Search Results

1. Liu & Anor v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 25 [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34. 4 hearing the claimants withdrew their claim against these respondents and they are therefore removed. The agent, Kim Robinson, gave evidence at the hearing after being summoned at the request of the Council. [6] The sixth respondent, PBS Distributors Limited (PBS), supplied the Ventclad cladding system to MHD. PBS complied with orders for discovery but took no other steps and did not appear at the hearing. PBS went i...

2. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

3. BORA Ngāti Tamaoho Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...was consistent with arts 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act.3 Whether s 27(3) at issue 8. Clause 25(3) of the Bill excludes damages or other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for a failure of the Crown to comply with a Crown minerals or taonga tūturu protocol. If the Crown fails to comply with a protocol without good cause, the Ngāti Tamaoho trustees may enforce the protoc...

4. Ngati Maru (Taranaki) Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 918 KB]

   ...articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act.' Exclusion of remedy of compensation 9. Clause 26(3) of the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol under the Bill. 10. This clause might be seen to raise the issue of consistency with s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, namely the right to bring c...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 48 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...(2009) 7 NZELR 1. 4 Waikato District Health Board v Clear [2010] NZCA 305. conditions. The Employment Court also found that Ms Clear‟s dismissal was unjustifiable. [5] During the three-year period between 2000 and 2003, Ms Clear made four formal written complaints to her employer about Ms Parata‟s conduct. The Court of Appeal described the first three complaints in these terms: [9] The first complaint [October 2000] focused on the stress Ms Clear said had been caused...

6. Filing a financial statement of judgment debtor individual [pdf, 362 KB]

   MOJ208/04/23 Ministry of Justice Collections Unit www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ 0800 233 222 PAGE 1 OF 13 INDIVIDUAL When should I use this form? This form lets the judgment creditor find out more about a judgment debtor’s ability to pay a judgment debt. It also lets the judgment debtor provide information so that a financial assessment can be completed without a hearing being required. Use this form if all the following apply: • you are either the judgment credit...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 121 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...Newman v Solid Roofing Ltd [2018] NZERA Auckland 214. determination dated 15 August 2018, the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendant in the sum of $5,000.2 [2] In addition to commencing the challenge by filing a statement of claim, the plaintiff has also filed an application for stay of proceedings. In effect, this is an application for an order staying enforcement of the monetary awards, although the application does not include the subsequent determination...

8. GA v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 103 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...contact at [bank] but was advised that the bank did not want to speak directly to HY. HY offered to take photographs of the moisture meter readings for an additional fee of $200 plus GST. 4. GA decided to engage another inspector to provide the information his bank required. 5. GA now claims a refund $736.00, being 80% of the price paid on the basis that R Ltd’s report was not sufficient to satisfy the bank. Issues 6. The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (a) Wheth...

9. TC v CC [2024] NZDT 470 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...apparent that there had been a leak for some time, which was not covered by insurance. 12. I find that the black mould discovered in 2022 was completely cleaned up before the stairwell was regibbed and re wall papered. A record of drying conditions form was provided which the repairer had completed when undertaking the drying process. There is also evidence that an anti-microbial treatment was twice applied as a make safe. 13. I reject any suggestion that the stairwell was regib...

10. MM v NF Ltd [2022] NZDT 60 (31 May 2022) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...a. I prefer the NF Ltd’s position that it is an inside facility with no outside capacity and so was prohibited from having more than 100 people; b. I do not accept that the contract was frustrated by an unexpected event which rendered the performance of the contract impossible or only possible in a very different way from what the parties contemplated, because the contract specifically anticipated and prescribed what would happen in the event of a Government Lockdown – namely that t...