Search Results

1. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief Pita Rikys [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...foreshore erosion, a matter of particular interest to Maori in terms of the incidence of foreshore burials. Waahi Tapu 17. The term given its broadest meaning, simply identifies 'sacred places' which can take a range of different forms and which broadly are coincident with archaeological sites. There is also a recognised hierarchy of sacredness or significance with burial sites and urupa (burial places) typically being accorded the highest ranking- compared with midd...

2. Heather v IDEA Services Ltd (Costs) [2012] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 55 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 11 Reference No. HRRT 038/2010 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN DAVID KEITH HEATHER FIRST PLAINTIFF AND RHONDA JEAN HEATHER SECOND PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LTD/IHC NZ INC FIRST DEFENDANTS AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH SECOND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Mr R Mu...

3. E & F Ltd v TA Ltd [2018] NZDT 1594 (3 April 2018) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...9. E & F Ltd provided numerous reports from insurer/assessors, emails, reports/analyses of substance (fertiliser) and damage to lettuces, photos, flight plans including hopper activity and screen shots of TA Ltd spreading data and customer information related to 18 December 2015. 10. TA Ltd states that it has not breached its duty of care and caused any damage to E & F Ltd. TA Ltd states that it owes a general duty of care to follow industry standards when they are distributin

4. [2022] NZEmpC 81 Honeybunch Pure Naturals NZ Ltd v Niekerk [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...is to provide a final opportunity for Honeybunch to file an amended statement of claim that fully and fairly informs not only Ms van Niekerk, but the Court, of the issue to be addressed. [10] I have decided that, while I will grant Ms Jolly’s request, it will be subject to conditions which must be adhered to. They are to be expressed as unless orders. [11] That, however, is not the end of the matter. Ms van Niekerk has been put to considerable expense as a result of the present...

5. CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...the business was made available to ABF through ABE. The agreement between the parties was that the gross profits were to be shared equally between ABE and ABF. [3] ABF failed to account to ABE for any of the profits, and when pressed, counter- claimed. Part of the counter-claim related to goods which ABF had acquired at the direction of ABE to supply to a customer, but that supply contract did not eventuate. 2 [4] Proceedings requiring ABF to account for its profits and for a...

6. Taylor v Corrections (Jurisdiction) [2019] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...grounds it contained passages which could reasonably be construed as threats or attempts to intimidate the then Prison Manager, a former prisoner and police officers in the Hastings area. [2] On discovering the letter had been intercepted Mr Taylor requested that it be returned to him or that he be provided with a copy. His request was refused. [3] Mr Taylor thereupon made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner alleging a breach of IPP 6 which, subject to certain exceptions, provides...

7. [2022] NZACC 5 – Estate of Raymond Morris v ACC (18 January 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Hearing: On the papers Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: The appellant was self-represented when the appeal was lodged L Hawes-Gandar for the respondent Judgment: 18 January 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury - s 32, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 August 2020. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decisio...

8. Kingsnorth v Crawford - Motuaruhe 5D Block (2020) 233 Waiariki MB 39 (233 WAR 39) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...response.2 [11] On 24 June 2019 counsel for the respondents filed a memorandum submitting that the time for filing submissions had lapsed and that no order of costs can be made for want of an application. Counsel for the applicant filed a response requesting an extension to file costs submissions on 28 June 2019. I granted the extension and directed counsel for the respondents to file a response by 1 October 2019.3 2 211 Waiariki M...

9. TS v LD TI & EX& W Inc [2021] NZDT 1598 (23 July 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...the PPE. 3. [B] was diagnosed with deep digital flexor tendinopathy and fibrocartilage damage of the navicular bone following a CT scan at [Veterinarian 1] on 10 December 2020. The prognosis from [Veterinarian 1] for [B] was poor for athletic performance and guarded for long term pleasure riding. TS elected to euthanise [B] on 11 December 2020 due to the poor prognosis. 4. TS claims $28,750.00 from TI, LD and EX, being a full reimbursement of the purchase price. 5. The issues t...

10. IQ v KM & MR [2024] NZDT 291 (9 May 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

    ...are not liable to pay any other amounts to IQ. What, if anything, is IQ liable to pay to the respondents? 31. I find that IQ is liable to pay the Respondents $35.71. 32. The Respondents have made a counterclaim seeking payment of $1,215.65 form IQ. During the hearing the Respondents added a claim for a further $100.00 of cleaning costs. I will consider each of the claims of the Respondents below. 33. Damage – The Respondents say that IQ damaged a door, which she opened to tak...