12548 items matching your search terms
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 81 EMPC 130/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF application for further disclosure BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND ASPARONA LIMITED First Defendant AND DELOITTE LIMITED Second Defendant AND DELOITTEASPARONA LIMITED Third Defendan...
...of Auckland. [5] In 2017, the complainant contacted Ms Ramos seeking a work visa. It is understood that Ms Ramos successfully sought more than one work visa for him. [6] In September 2021, Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) released information about a one-off residence visa for certain work visa holders in the country (the 2021 RV instructions or application). Those eligible could apply from 1 March 2022 until 31 July 2022. On 30 September, the complainant sent an email...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 348 BETWEEN AFS FIRST APPLICANT AND AFT SECOND APPLICANT AND ZUD FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZUE SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 2 July 2013 Referee: Referee Robertshawe ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZUE is to pay to AFS and AFT the sum of $10,063.02 within 28 days. Facts [1] On 9 December 2006, AFS and AFT entered i...
...The following seven considerations may apply, to a greater or lesser extent, in a particular case. 2 AC41/06, 31 July 2006. 3 (1999) 13 PRNZ 48. • If no stay is granted, whether the applicant’s right of appeal will be ineffectual; • whether the appeal is brought and prosecuted for good reasons, in good faith; • whether the successful party at first instance will be affected injuriously by a stay; • the effe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 74 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by KQ against M Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KQ purchased a 2018 Range Rover Sport car from M Ltd in January 2022 for $129,800.00. 2. Several months following the purchase KQ noticed that the car’s service light was on, indicating the car...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 574 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim in negligence is dismissed; and The Tribunal approves the following settlement: The parties agree that U Ltd will pay $15,000.00 to BT on or before 27 August 2024. Reasons 1. On [date] BT delivered his [car] to U Ltd to have new tyres fitted. The tyres re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 220 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT MT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. On the counterclaim SN is to pay MT Ltd the sum of $71.00 on or before 20 December 2022. Reasons: 1. On 8 June 2022 SN parked his vehicle in the carpark building at [Location]. SN did not pay for his use of the carpark as he di...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1499 APPLICANT GQ RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: GQ is to pay the sum of $690.00 to M Ltd on or before 14 May 2015 but is not liable to pay M Ltd’s claim for further money for the twelve months to 9 July 2015. Reasons: 1. M Ltd (M Ltd) salesperson DN found GQ’s small business on TradeMe,...
...different Member of the Authority consider the matter.2 Those determinations followed an earlier determination in which the Authority dismissed the substantive proceedings before it mainly on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prosecute its claims.3 These proceedings, therefore, have a considerable history before both the Authority and the Court. 1 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [2018] NZERA Auckland 185. 2 GEA...
...05928: DAVID AND REBECCA SPEIRS AS TRUSTEES OF THE SPEIRS FAMILY TRUST ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Background [1] Rebecca Speirs on behalf of the Speirs Family Trust has filed an application for reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision made under section 48 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). [2] Section 49 of the Act provides that claimants may apply to the Chair seeking...