Search Results

1. APB Ltd v VW LCRO 133 / 2010 (3 August 2011) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN ABP LTD of [North Island] Applicant AND MR VW of [North Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] After considering a complaint made by ABP Ltd (the Applicant) against Mr...

2. LCRO 130/2016 RB v ZB (28 June 2017) [pdf, 229 KB]

   LCRO 130/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWTDN RB Applicant AND ZB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr RB has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee that no further action in respe...

3. EC v OM Ltd [2022] NZDT 89 (22 August 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 89 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT OM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. EC has made an application to the Tribunal for an order that he is able to reject the MH 70” TV he purchased from OM Ltd in July 2014 and receive a full refund or a replacement TV. Can EC reject the goods unde...

4. S Ltd v OB [2024] NZDT 226 (20 March 2024) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

5. DS v NS [2018] NZDT 1454 (7 May 2018) [pdf, 130 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1454 APPLICANT DS RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal hereby orders: NS is to pay DS $779.10 by 4pm on 14 May 2018. Reasons 1. On 14 January 2018, DS was walking her dogs along [Redacted] Road, in [Redacted] . Near the [Forest], DS noticed a dog that was not on a lead. The dog ran straight up to her dogs and attacked the...

6. EN v HM [2023] NZDT 581 (22 November 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 581 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT HM t/a TT The Tribunal orders: HM is to pay EN $1,284.95 by the 18 December 2023. Reasons: 1. EN purchased a [rifle] from HM trading as TT on the 30 July 2023 for $1284.95. 2. EN claims that when he received the rifle it had a faulty safety mechanism which failed to lock the bolt and the picatinny rail...

7. UM v QO [2022] NZDT 252 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 252 APPLICANT UM RESPONDENT QO SECOND RESPONDENT DO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UM purchased a vehicle from DO via her son QO after seeing it advertised on U. 2. Prior to this, UM organised for it to be checked over by B and QO assisted with this taking place. 3. After the in...

8. QA v FI & II [2024] NZDT 231 (6 March 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 231 APPLICANT QA RESPONDENT FI and II The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. QA purchased a house at [address], from FI and II with a settlement date of 7 July 2023. It rained heavily that night and he found the garage flooded, even though a pump set up to mitigate flooding was running. Just two weeks later, o...

9. ED v MA [2023] NZDT 556 (18 April 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 556 APPLICANT ED RESPONDENT MA The Tribunal orders: MA is to pay ED $110.00 on or before 9 May 2023. Reasons 1. ED and his partner bought a kitten from MA through the [online] website, paying a total of $1,240.00. After possessing the kitten for a couple of days, ED discovered a minor rash on the kitten’s muzzle, which over th...

10. Options for resolving remaining Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance disputes [pdf, 384 KB]

    ...arbitration tribunal. We recommend you discuss these options, and potential funding for them through Budget 2018, with your Ministerial colleagues and advise us of your preferred approach. Executive summary 3. Most Canterbury earthquake insurance claims have been settled using existing legal processes and dispute resolution schemes. Processes for settling claims, and resolving insurance disputes, have evolved since the earthquakes to deal with an unprecedented number of claims....