Search Results

1. N Ltd v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 341 (25 May 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0121/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM311052 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 7. In the email communications between the parties T Ltd stated that breach notices are enforced under contract law. N Ltd informed T Ltd that the driver had no authority to enter into a contract on the company’s behalf and provided supporting evidence. N Ltd also provided T Ltd with a copy of a Disputes Tribunal decision which canvasses the issue of a driver parki...

2. BE v E Ltd [2025] NZDT 244 (12 June 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...not’), that the advice given by LN was negligent or wrong. 15. BE’s claim is therefore dismissed and there is no need for me to address the second issue. Referee: R Merrett Date: 12 June 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 246 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...list of documents with regard to s 54 and s 56 of the Evidence Act. [12] The relevant aspects of s 54 relating to privilege for communications with legal advisers provide: 54 Privilege for communications with legal advisers (1) A person who requests or obtains professional legal service from a legal adviser has a privilege in respect of any communication between the person and the legal adviser if the communication was— (a) intended to be confidential; and (b) made in the...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 19 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Unite Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...at various locations across New Zealand. [2] Unite says that Restaurant Brands’ current statement of claim does not comply with reg 11(1)(d) of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the Regulations). It is Restaurant Brands’ claims for special damages that are in issue before the Court. [3] Unite applies for an order that the claims for money relief in the proceedings be struck out (other than costs), or, alternatively, an order that a compliant statement of cla...

5. FAQs

   On this page you'll find answers to some commonly asked questions. More information can be found within the website and in the Homeowners' Guide to the Tribunal. Who can apply to the Tribunal? Why won’t the Tribunal look at Kaikōura claims? Does the Tribunal consider claims involving on-sold properties? Does the Tribunal consider claims involving builders or other parties? What about claims that are with the courts? Where is the Tribunal located? When can claims be filed

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal

6. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...comply with an order for discovery, a notice for further particulars, a notice for interrogatories, or other similar requirement under these rules; or (v) failing, without reasonable justification, to accept an offer of settlement whether in the form of an offer under rule 14.10 or some other offer to settle or dispose of the proceeding; … 24. The claimant states that items (i), (ii) and (iii) above cover the Council’s behaviour in question. 25. The claimant also refer...

7. NS v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 5 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...has passed, his claim for a refund must be dismissed because the vests he received matched the description L Ltd provided and were fit for purpose. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 30 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. ZE v NE [2022] NZDT 90 (26 August 2022) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Page 2 of 3 8. For these reasons I find that NE was not negligent and is not responsible for the cat’s distressing injuries nor the costs to treat them. Referee Perfect Date: 26 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. DQ v BH [2024] NZDT 810 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...salvage amount obtained for the wreck. 2. The dispute centres around the pre-accident value PAV) used in J Ltd’s calculations. The vehicle was insured with an ‘agreed value’ of $2750.00 and the assessor has noted on the repair assessment form that PAV is $2750.00. An ‘agreed value’ for insurance purposes is not necessarily the same as a market value, and it is market value just prior to the collision that is used for an accurate measure of damages resulting from negligence....

10. [2011] NZEmpC 68 Army Surplus Disposals Ltd v Reed [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...produce this book to the Authority. (d) Mr Doyle claimed he could provide further evidence that Mr Reed received the money alleged if he was given time. The Authority Member allowed Mr Doyle 10 days following the investigation to provide this information but he failed to do so. [5] The determination records findings and orders as follows: [7] By operating its business on a cash basis, without documentation, the respondent has put itself in a vulnerable position. In the absence...