12922 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 628 BETWEEN AJ APPLICANT AND ZQ Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 18 July 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is hereby dismissed. Facts [1] Following a routine eye examination in January 2008, AJ (the applicant) was referred to an eye specialist to be tested for suspected ocular hypertension. The testing at the eye specialist...
...175 [20 April 2012] IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT 2012 Māori Appellate Court MB 175 (2012 APPEAL 175) A20110005401 UNDER Section 98, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application for an award of costs from the Māori Land Court Special Aid Fund following a withdrawal of an application to appeal BETWEEN TE OHOMAURI RIPIA Applicant Appearances: B Tupara, counsel for the applicant Jud...
...Hearing: 9 July 2024 Held at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: P Aubrey for the Appellant D Russ for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 15 July 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury – ss 20, 25, 26, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 July 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 746 APPLICANT DE RESPONDENT FJ The Tribunal orders: 1. FJ is to pay DE $26,810.19 on or before 5 January 2024. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The parties entered into a Contract Milking Agreement from 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2021. A Variable Order Sharemilking Agreement was used because FJ could not access a Co...
...The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] On 3 April 2007, the Applicants and SH purchased a motel business in X. [2] The business was under-performing but the purchasers formed the view that there was considerable potential to grow the business and paid a sum in excess of $400,000 for the goodwill of the business based on valuation advice received at the time. [3] Difficulties with the vendor and the state o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 59 APPLICANT GU Ltd RESPONDENT LN The Tribunal orders: LN is to pay GU Ltd the sum of $3,141.62 on or before 5pm on 17 June 2022. Reasons 1. On 9 March 2022 at 8.53pm LN hired two GU Ltd scooters (the scooters). The scooters travelled around [City] for approximately 48 minutes before they lost contact. GU Ltd allege the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 400 APPLICANTS S Ltd T Ltd RESPONDENT BK The Tribunal orders: 1. T Ltd is joined as co-applicant. 2. The spelling of the respondent’s name is corrected to BK. 3. The claim is dismissed. 4. T Ltd is to remove the materials from BK’s property at a mutually convenient time on or before 20 July 2023. If the materi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 38 APPLICANT NQ RESPONDENT HN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NQ purchased a two year old female huntaway working dog called C from HN in April 2021. In June 2021 C suffered a prolapse and NQ put her down. He claimed for a refund of the $2,000 purchase price he paid. 2. HN disagreed th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1359 APPLICANT CW Ltd RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: KI is to pay $1,044.75 to CW Ltd on or before 11 November 2020; and CW Ltd is to deliver the remaining books in their possession to KI forthwith. Reasons 1. KI engaged CW Ltd trading as QQ to provide printing services for a children’s book she had writ...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 136 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT EU APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. LN and a K Ltd truck being driven by EU were involved in a collision at about 8.30am on 7 June 2022 on [Road]. LN alleges she was driving on a straight...