Search Results

1. TH v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 279 (17 July 2023) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...what discussions took place. TH however states she was not asked if she wanted a second night for a late checkout, and if she had been asked, she would have declined the offer for budgetary reasons. 7. If read in isolation, the hotel booking information on the itinerary could suggest TH would be enjoying two full nights, with departure on the 27th being no later than 10am. However, the itinerary also provides flight information which clearly states the flight was leaving at 12.15am (...

2. LI Ltd v TC [2024] NZDT 56 (10 January 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...renovation. They proceeded to firm up pricing, using an independent QS for modelling and pricing detail, and engaged in meetings with TC’s architect and sub-contractors over the next 9 months. 2. However, it was not until June 2023 that LI Ltd sent formal building contract documentation to TC for signing before the commencement of building. Once she received it, she forwarded the contract to her bank for approval and the bank had concerns about multiple aspects of the contract. TC t...

3. HH v NC [2024] NZDT 53 (29 February 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...as they have been approved by an insurance assessor. 11. Accordingly, NC is liable in negligence for the costs of repairs to the ute of $2,858.19. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 29 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. S Ltd v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 779 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...the sum payable by the buyer for collection costs. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 November 2023 1 [2003] BCL 677. 2 Nags Head Horse Hotel Ltd v Epsom Woods Ltd [2020] NZHC 2973 at para 43. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. FU v KT & G Ltd [2023] NZDT 431 (5 September 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...listed as [redacted]. 8. As the photo provided was not clear, I suggested to both parties that they may wish to provide a better copy, or other evidence to support their understanding of who the seller was. Neither party provided any further information on this at the second hearing. In the absence of any further evidence, I find that it is most probable that G Ltd is the seller of the vehicle, as its trade name and email address is legible in the area for sellers details, in the cont...

6. LG v DG [2023] NZDT 361 (31 July 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...satisfaction of the debt owed by DG. Conclusion 20. DG was obliged to pay LG $5,700 for the car. He has only paid $500 and so owes LG the balance of $5,200.00 Referee: S Simmonds Date: 31 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. T Ltd v M Ltd [2022] NZDT 191 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...19. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that the amount due is $5,750.00 including GST. The extra work done is offset by the incomplete job. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 20 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

8. KB v ZA [2024] NZDT 524 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...confident that the policy would cover the issue with this vehicle, up to the policy limit of $7,000.00. 5. This was a private sale. Purchasers have very few potential legal remedies in a private sale. The seller does not have a duty to provide any information to the buyer. The seller does not have to ensure that the vehicle is in good condition. The onus is on the buyer to satisfy themselves about the quality and fitness for purpose of the vehicle. 6. The only arguable basis for...

9. DI v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 684 (11 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...perpetual difficulty when a conversation is verbal and the parties have differing recollections. 11. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 11 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

10. ET & MT v LS & B Ltd [2024] NZDT 294 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...connection to and love of animals. 10. In conclusion, I find that LS is not liable to pay ET and MT any compensation and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 8 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...