Search Results

1. OIA-Compensation for wrongful conviction and detention - rates [pdf, 429 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T: 04 918 8800 | E: contactus@justice.govt.nz W: www.justice.govt.nz 6 November 2024 Dear OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT REQUEST: COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND DETENTION – RATES Thank you for your email of 15 October 2024 requesting information concerning the determination of the monetary compensation rates in the Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Detention (2023). Your

2. HU & DU v I Ltd & CJ Ltd [2024] NZDT 598 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...the vehicle that have different circumferences cause strain on AWD system and can lead to failure of the AWD (transmission) system. HU and DU were unaware it was necessary to replace all four tyres when any tyre need to be replaced. They have requested the Tribunal to order compensation from I Ltd and CJ Ltd. Did I Ltd mislead the applicants regarding replacement tyres for the AWD vehicle? 2. Section 10 of the Fair Trading Act 1986 provides that “no person shall, in trade, e...

3. [2022] NZIACDT 7 - TA v Tian (27 April 2022) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: R Sathiyanathan, counsel Adviser: No appearance 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The complainant is TA, who engaged the services of Ying Tian (aka Tina Qin). Ms Tian made numerous applications on behalf of the complainant which were unsuccessful. For a prolonged period, she pretended to be acting for him but was not actually undertaking any work on his behalf. As a result of her conduct, the complainant’s immigratio

4. KS v T Ltd & H Ltd [2023] NZDT 595 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...an order against another company when the company he contracted with has been identified and ordered to pay. The application for rehearing is therefore declined. Referee Perfect Date: 17 November 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. [2020] NZREADT 19 - Singh - costs (1 May 2020) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...behalf of the Committee and Mr Singh. The Tribunal did not hold a defended hearing. The Tribunal’s decision (dated 31 July 2018) was published on the Tribunal’s website on 3 August 2018.2 [7] On 10 July 2019, the Tribunal received an emailed request from Mr Edmondson, an attorney practising in the United States of America, for a copy of the Tribunal’s file for the proceeding. Mr Edmondson said that the facts of the proceeding had been part of the record in defamation procee...

6. [2023] NZREADT 35 - UM v REAA (CAC 2103) (13 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...appellant: Self-represented Counsel for the first respondent: M Mortimer-Wang, A Stuart Counsel for the second respondent: R M Stewart, R H Anderson The third respondent: No appearance SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDER RULING (Applications for publication and non-publication orders) Dated 13 December 2023 2 INTRODUCTION [1] This matter concerns a complaint by UM, the appellant, against Ned Gow, a licensed salesperson under the Real Estate Agents Ac...

7. IJ v SO LCRO 76 / 2011 (15 February 2012) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...had been withdrawn, and the Court made appointments in favour of another person who had been proposed by the Applicant. [9] The Applicant was much offended by the allegations against him, particularly those involving financial matters. He claimed to have had incurred 3 significant legal expenses in respect of court applications which he noted were not successful in the event, contending that it was known to the Practitioner to have no prospect of success, adding that it...

8. Ratahi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Section 53 Block IX Opunake SD being part Ngati Kahumate Block comprised in CT D4/240 (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...February 2006. Mr Lawrence counsel for a number of respondents wrote to Mr Bulfin on 9 November 2005 raising the issue of jurisdiction but received no reply he says. The matter was set down for hearing on 24 February 2006 but was adjourned at the request of Mrs Hughes QC, counsel for the applicants in the instant case (the respondents in the substantive proceeding) who said she needed time to prepare and to brief rebuttal evidence. The substantive hearing occurred on 16 June 2006 wh...

9. [2022] NZACC 114 – Jamieson v ACC (15 June 2022) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The appellant was self-represented L Hawes-Gandar for the respondent Judgment: 15 June 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This judgment concerns a claim for costs in relation to a successful appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 11 January 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for r...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 28 - XA v Hill (29 June 2020) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...2 INTRODUCTION [1] Ms Jennifer Ann Hill, the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, Mr Gu, to engage with her client, Ms XA, the complainant. Furthermore, Ms Hill lacked diligence in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The complaint was referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to the Tribunal. It was upheld in a decision issued o...