12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 791 APPLICANT UC RESPONDENT DT The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant may undertake work to remove the existing fence and build a new fence on the boundary between his property and the respondent’s property. 2. The fence shall be constructed with the materials and in the design as set out in the applicant’s Fencing Not...
...111 [25 September 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 111 EMPC 14/2018 EMPC 47/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN PAUL HINES Plaintiff AND EASTLAND PORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P McBride, counsel for plaintiff E J Brown, counsel for defendant Judgmen...
...for Company T, Lawyer K wrote to the applicants. In that letter he: • Asserted that the applicants did not have the right to use the letterhead “XX Heights” claiming it to be misleading and in breach of intellectual property rights; • Requested copies of the letters of complaint; and • Demanded that the applicants cease and desist using the letterhead immediately. The tone of the letter might be described as aggressive. 2 [3] On 19 September 2008 the applicants comp...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1412 APPLICANT BF RESPONDENT BN The Tribunal orders: BN is to pay BF $1,000.00 on or before 22 April 2021. Reasons: 1. BF purchased a [vehicle] from BN in a private sale on 20 September 2020 and drove it home to [Town 1] from [Town 2] that day. He purchased the vehicle as he wished to use it to tow a food caravan....
...[2024] NZEmpC 158 EMPC 288/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a review of a search order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for consequential orders following a search order BETWEEN CHAIN & RIGGING SUPPLIES LIMITED Applicant AND JUSTIN DOUGLAS WERAHOKO NIKORIMA First Respondent AND RAPIDO SAFETY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Amaranathan, counsel for applicant J Dougl...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 401 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT TB SECOND RESPONDENT QJ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TB is to pay $2,563.74 to B Ltd by 5.00pm on 31 March 2020. TB’s counter claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] EI was in the process of exiting a side road an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1699 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT TB SECOND RESPONDENT QJ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TB is to pay $2,563.74 to B Ltd by 5.00pm on 31 March 2020. TB’s counter claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] EI was in the process of exiting a side road a...
...short of another collision in front of him. TN was driving [car 2] and AM, an employee of PD Ltd was driving [car 3]. The second and third cars collided with the third car shunting the second car into the first car. 2. TG and its insurer BJ Ltd claimed $2,975.95 for insured losses for his car which was written off, from TN, PD Ltd and AM. However at the hearing, the claim against TN was withdrawn. 3. TN and its insurer BJ Ltd counter claimed $25,597.26 comprising $25,084.48 for r...
...Bruce Stewart QC has appeared with Mr Nicholson this morning for the plaintiff, Mr Stewart being recently brought into the matter. He, having considered the proceedings, has indicated that the plaintiff wishes to file a third amended statement of claim. [2] This third amended statement of claim, which has been handed up in a draft or proposed draft form this morning, effectively discontinues the proceedings against the second defendant, Jacob Roest and the third defendant...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 579 APPLICANT KT and PD RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: KI is to pay KT and PD $542.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] KI engaged KT and PD, the applicants, by way of [job agency] to assist him in moving furniture when he was moving from one property to another. They claim $542.00, which comprises the cost of their labour and some expenses incurred in doing the work. KI accepts that the wo...