Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12546 items matching your search terms

  1. UN v CD Ltd & CD [2023] NZDT 663 (16 October 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 663 APPLICANT UN RESPONDENT CD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT CD The Tribunal orders: UN’s claims against CD Ltd, and CD is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2015, UN engaged the services of CD Ltd to survey his property at [address] for a subdivision. On 17 April 2019, CD Ltd invoiced UN $11,715.63 for the survey fees including $2...

  2. EC v UI [2023] NZDT 615 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 615 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT UI APPLICANT'S INSURER X Insurance The Tribunal orders: UI is to pay $8,588.44 to X Insurance on or before 5.00pm on 11 December 2023. Reasons 1. EC was driving north on [Street] which has two lanes in each direction separated by a median. Soon after he passed the entrance to [Landmark]...

  3. I Ltd v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 567 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 567 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay I Ltd $30,000.00 on or before 3 September 2024. 2. The counterclaim by Q Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. Q Ltd took its [vehicle] to I Ltd on 2 May 2023 for a Certificate of Fitness (COF). I Ltd inspected the [vehicle] and found a coolant leak. Q Ltd gave the...

  4. T ltd v EJ [2019] NZDT 1436 (28 August 2019) [pdf, 148 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1436 APPLICANT T Limited RESPONDENT E J The Tribunal hereby orders: T Limited’s claim against E J is dismissed. Reasons 1. In January 2019, T Limited provided labour and machinery to Mr E J for a job at his property in [City A]. T Limited invoiced Mr J for $4,740.40. This included the provision of 11 staff...

  5. KS v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 28 (11 January 2023) [pdf, 225 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 28 APPLICANT KS FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT T Ltd H Ltd The Tribunal orders: H Ltd is to pay $6500.00 to KS on or before 3 February 2023; and The claim against T Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. KS took his classic car to T Ltd for recompliance certification work – the underbody of the...

  6. [2014] NZEmpC 144 Nash v NZ Trade & Enterprise and Wellington Regional Chamber of Commerce [pdf, 151 KB]

    ...Wall, above n 18, at 544. 21 Peihopo, above n 19, at 168. defendants, Ms Berryman and Ms Davies, both note in their submissions that in her affidavit, Ms Angus Burney did not make any reference to giving advice to Mr Nash about the applicable limitation period in relation to personal grievance claims. [25] The two relevant paragraphs in Ms Angus Burney's affidavit dated 22 April 2013 relating to the limitation issue state: 5. I recall that I discussed a significa...

  7. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...MCLC had appointed Ms Angela Walker to conduct an investigation into Ms Cook’s allegations of workplace bullying and sexual harassment. Ms Walker was due to interview Ms Cook on 6 March 2017. [23] On 3 March 2017 Ms Abraham sent an email to WINZ requesting: [23.1] File notes for Ms Cook from January 2012 to December 2017; [23.2] Details of Ms Cook’s current WINZ supplements; and [23.3] Details of Ms Cook’s outstanding debts to WINZ, specifically, the reason for the debt, the r...

  8. IPT Practice Note 5 Publication of decisions [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...from a decision a section of text. It may be replaced it with, as appropriate, a notice that the section has been withheld from publication and/or a summary of the information contained in the section. - “appellant” means the appellant, applicant or affected person, as relevant. - “to depersonalise” means to remove from a decision the name of the appellant and other details considered likely to identify him or her, or any other person. - “member” means “members”...

  9. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 Procedural Order 4 [pdf, 230 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2021-100-002 BETWEEN HELEN BERNADETTE O’SULLIVAN, FIONA CHERIE WHITE & ANDREW RODGER WILTON as trustees of the WILTON FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND DEANE FLUIT BUILDER LTD First Respondent AND TAB DESIGN LTD (Removed) Second Respondent AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT

  10. TM v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 494 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 494 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. TM is to pay D Ltd Dunedin the sum of $4,488.50 on or before 24 July 2024. 2. On receipt of the funds outlined in order 1 above, D Ltd Dunedin is to return the signs that are the subject of this dispute to TM’s premises. Return of the signs is to occur within 7 days of receipt of t...