Search Results

1. H Ltd v TU, DU and GU as trustees for the U Family Trust [2024] NZDT 185 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...caused by the failure of the Trust to keep its roof clean. For this reason, it is not necessary to consider the other two issues and the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 4 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. HC v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 482 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...[Shopping Mall] did not have a business lounge and was not advised of any other locations that had business lounge services. 6. The website states S Ltd provides unlimited access to a business lounge. In the hearing, S Ltd accepted its website and information including the terms and conditions did not include information about the services they could access. 7. S Ltd accepted an ordinary person would not know [Shopping Mall] did not have a business lounge and would not know they ha...

3. CC & TC v BE & NE [2023] NZDT 524 (18 October 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...hearing was adjourned to give CC & TC an opportunity to provide evidence detailing the issue with the pool. They have not done this, and I advised that it would not be appropriate to adjourn the hearing again. Balancing their right to provide information and be heard against BE & NE’s right for proceedings to be resolved in a timely manner, I find it would be unjust to grant a further adjournment as CC & TC have had adequate opportunity to provide information but have not tak...

4. N Ltd v MX [2023] NZDT 387 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...conclusion, I find no evidence N Ltd have breached their obligations under the Agency Agreement. MX is therefore liable under clause 5.2 to pay the commission due. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 5 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. SP v MT [2024] NZDT 851 (21 October 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...purchased a car for $8200 that was advertised [online] by MT. 2. SP flew to [City 1] collected the car that had been left out for him and drove 900 odd kms back to [Town]. 3. A few weeks later SP contacted MT to complain about the gearbox and to inform him that it needed work. There had been an earlier complaint about the dipstick having broken wand and a broken filler flap, these costs are included in the claim. 4. SP claims $3279, comprising $2583.54 for a gearbox repair plus c...

6. UE v TF & KD [2024] NZDT 652 (9 September 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...damages in the sum of $23,000 which is the cost of a new engine. 3. The matter was first heard on 25 June 2024 before DTR Wilson. Partway through the hearing, a report was mentioned that was supplied by KD to UE which allegedly contained incorrect information. The matter was adjourned to give UE the opportunity to add KD as a Second Respondent after which the hearing was to be started afresh. 4. I heard the matter today with KD present as a Second Respondent. Issues: 5. After...

7. DI v KB Ltd and others [2024] NZDT 679 (28 August 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...enquired about whether the van was insured; she had assumed that it was because she considered it to be a courtesy car, provided in the course of OL’s business to SD. [4] On 29 January 2024, DI had an accident while driving the van. Her father had informed SD about this. After some discussion, SD had said that he and OL would sort the matter out with the insurer of the other party to the accident. [5] DI was subsequently found liable in a separate Disputes Tribunal proceeding for t...

8. N Ltd v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 341 (25 May 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0121/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM311052 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 7. In the email communications between the parties T Ltd stated that breach notices are enforced under contract law. N Ltd informed T Ltd that the driver had no authority to enter into a contract on the company’s behalf and provided supporting evidence. N Ltd also provided T Ltd with a copy of a Disputes Tribunal decision which canvasses the issue of a driver parki...

9. BE v E Ltd [2025] NZDT 244 (12 June 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...not’), that the advice given by LN was negligent or wrong. 15. BE’s claim is therefore dismissed and there is no need for me to address the second issue. Referee: R Merrett Date: 12 June 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. Form-32_Family-Invoice_Care-of-Children.pdf [pdf, 222 KB]

    Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 32 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Care of Children/Guardianship Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final inv...