Search Results

1. TG v AM & PD Ltd [2023] NZDT 368 (24 July 2023) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...short of another collision in front of him. TN was driving [car 2] and AM, an employee of PD Ltd was driving [car 3]. The second and third cars collided with the third car shunting the second car into the first car. 2. TG and its insurer BJ Ltd claimed $2,975.95 for insured losses for his car which was written off, from TN, PD Ltd and AM. However at the hearing, the claim against TN was withdrawn. 3. TN and its insurer BJ Ltd counter claimed $25,597.26 comprising $25,084.48 for r...

2. AJ v ZQ Ltd [2014] NZDT 628 (18 July 2014) [pdf, 26 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 628 BETWEEN AJ APPLICANT AND ZQ Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 18 July 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is hereby dismissed. Facts [1] Following a routine eye examination in January 2008, AJ (the applicant) was referred to an eye specialist to be tested for suspected ocular hypertension. The testing at the eye specialist...

3. KT & PD v KI [2024] NZDT 579 (13 August 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 579 APPLICANT KT and PD RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: KI is to pay KT and PD $542.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] KI engaged KT and PD, the applicants, by way of [job agency] to assist him in moving furniture when he was moving from one property to another. They claim $542.00, which comprises the cost of their labour and some expenses incurred in doing the work. KI accepts that the wo...

4. N v K LCRO 9 / 2008 (3 February 2009) [pdf, 13 KB]

   ...for Company T, Lawyer K wrote to the applicants. In that letter he: • Asserted that the applicants did not have the right to use the letterhead “XX Heights” claiming it to be misleading and in breach of intellectual property rights; • Requested copies of the letters of complaint; and • Demanded that the applicants cease and desist using the letterhead immediately. The tone of the letter might be described as aggressive. 2 [3] On 19 September 2008 the applicants comp...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 158 Chain & Rigging Supplies Ltd v Nikorima [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...[2024] NZEmpC 158 EMPC 288/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a review of a search order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for consequential orders following a search order BETWEEN CHAIN & RIGGING SUPPLIES LIMITED Applicant AND JUSTIN DOUGLAS WERAHOKO NIKORIMA First Respondent AND RAPIDO SAFETY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Amaranathan, counsel for applicant J Dougl...

6. DE v FJ [2023] NZDT 746 (15 December 2023) [pdf, 215 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 746 APPLICANT DE RESPONDENT FJ The Tribunal orders: 1. FJ is to pay DE $26,810.19 on or before 5 January 2024. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The parties entered into a Contract Milking Agreement from 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2021. A Variable Order Sharemilking Agreement was used because FJ could not access a Co...

7. Ripia - Special Aid [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 175 (2012 APPEAL 175) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...175 [20 April 2012] IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT 2012 Māori Appellate Court MB 175 (2012 APPEAL 175) A20110005401 UNDER Section 98, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application for an award of costs from the Māori Land Court Special Aid Fund following a withdrawal of an application to appeal BETWEEN TE OHOMAURI RIPIA Applicant Appearances: B Tupara, counsel for the applicant Jud...

8. McConachy v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal injury) [2024] NZACC 113 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...Hearing: 9 July 2024 Held at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: P Aubrey for the Appellant D Russ for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 15 July 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury – ss 20, 25, 26, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 July 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review...

9. GU Ltd v LN [2022] NZDT 59 (7 June 2022) [pdf, 241 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 59 APPLICANT GU Ltd RESPONDENT LN The Tribunal orders: LN is to pay GU Ltd the sum of $3,141.62 on or before 5pm on 17 June 2022. Reasons 1. On 9 March 2022 at 8.53pm LN hired two GU Ltd scooters (the scooters). The scooters travelled around [City] for approximately 48 minutes before they lost contact. GU Ltd allege the...

10. S Ltd & T Ltd v BK [2023] NZDT 400 (4 July 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 400 APPLICANTS S Ltd T Ltd RESPONDENT BK The Tribunal orders: 1. T Ltd is joined as co-applicant. 2. The spelling of the respondent’s name is corrected to BK. 3. The claim is dismissed. 4. T Ltd is to remove the materials from BK’s property at a mutually convenient time on or before 20 July 2023. If the materi...