Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 035 Taylor v Small [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...dated 21 December 2018 (first memorandum), the memorandum of counsel for the applicants in reply dated 29 January 2019 and the memorandum for the respondents' in response dated 7 February 2019 (respondent's response memorandum). Amount of claim [6] The respondents have incurred total solicitor/client and witness costs and disbursements in respect of the proceedings of $65,385.38. Of that, $63,156.59 (including G8T) are solicitor/client costs and disbursements and $2,228.76...

2. SN v EH [2024] NZDT 763 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 763 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT EH The Tribunal orders: The claim by SN against EH is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 15 June 2021, the Applicant, SN, purchased two twin-hulled [Boat]s from the Respondent, EH, for a total purchase price of $14,000.00. 2. The purchase was recorded in a handwritten sale agreement signed by both parties on...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 2 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd [pdf, 276 KB]

   BRONWYN JOY CLEARKIN v GENEVA HEALTHCARE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2019] NZEmpC 2 [23 January 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2019] NZEmpC 2 EMPC 2/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN BRONWYN JOY CLEARKIN Applicant AND GENEVA HEALTHCARE LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: B Clearkin, applicant in person M Manik, agent for respondent Jud...

4. GF v UH LCRO 178 / 2011 (2 November 2011) [pdf, 62 KB]

   LCRO 178/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN GF of [North Island] Applicant AND UH of [North Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] UH (the Practitioner) acted for GF (the Applicant) in relati...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 234 2015 AFT v BCM [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...v BCM NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 [23 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 2/2015 IN THE MATTER OF of an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN AFT Applicant AND BCM Respondent Hearing: By memoranda of submissions and affidavits filed on 21 April, 25 May, 25 June, 14 and 20 July, 18 and 31 August, 14 September, 12 October and 3 November 2015 Appearances: Appl...

6. Khan v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 45 (24 April 2015) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...instructions to lodge an expression of interest, and did so in a form that could not lead to a successful outcome. It claimed points that were not available for the relevant position of employment. The allegations are that she: [2.1] Lodged the defective application because she did not prepare it with due care, and professionalism. [2.2] She failed to provide advice to her client in the form required when lodging a process that had no hope of success. [3] Ms Khetarpal responded to th...

7. Zhong v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 47 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...WEI LI Third Respondent AND STANLEY CHEN Fourth Respondent AND ORIENT BUILDERS LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND LU ZHENG Sixth Respondent AND HBRC LIMITED Seventh Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: S Pezaro Applications for costs [1] Auckland Council, the first respondent, and Stanley Chen, the fourth respondent, have applied for costs against the claimants. The claimants‟ claims against these respondents were dismissed on 1 July 2011. T...

8. [2006] NZEmpC AC 53A/06 Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...GRAHAM V CRESTLINE PTY LTD AK AC 53A/06 21 November 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 53A/06 ARC 100/05 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN DONALD MONTROSE GRAHAM Plaintiff AND CRESTLINE PTY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 20 October and 8 November 2006 Judgment: 21 November 2006 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHI...

9. [2018] NZEmpC 104 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...[2018] NZEmpC 104 EMPC 377/2015 EMPC 277/2016 EMPC 215/2017 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a compliance order BETWEEN PETER D’ARCY LORIGAN Plaintiff AND INFINITY AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on papers dated 17 August to 4 September 2018) Appearances: P Lorigan, in...

10. QC v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 782 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 782 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay QC the total sum of $1,495.00 on or before Tuesday, 15 October 2024. Reasons: 1. In November 2022, QC purchased a new build property in a front lot of 8 townhouses in a development in [suburb]. QC initially claimed against the Developer S Ltd however as it was i...