12860 items matching your search terms
LCRO 119/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN CH of Auckland Applicant AND XO of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In May 2008 the Applicant and his wife approached the Respondent for advice...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 192 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT XN The Tribunal orders: XN is to pay I Ltd $30,000.00 on or before Friday 5 May 2023. Reasons: 1. On 30 July 2020, XN purchased a [redacted] vehicle from I Ltd for $34,100.00. The vehicle was purchased on finance and as part of the sale XN used the services of I Ltd to broker insur...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 506 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT UX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. J Ltd provide training services and courses in psychological first aid. It contacted UX, [redacted], and offered its service to develop a psychological first aid course to meet the needs of UX. 2. The parties agreed that HS, director of J Ltd, should t...
...was refundable. Was K Ltd entitled to cancel the contract and retain the deposit paid? 8. A party who has entered into a contract with another party, may cancel the agreement if the other party makes it clear that it does not intend to perform or complete the performance of obligations under the contract (section 33, Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA)). If a contract is unlawfully cancelled, then in some instances the Tribunal may order a refund of some or all the mon...
...had ended. Ms Linley would have known that Mrs Clough already knew about the offer for the property, having been party to the agency agreement when the offer was made. Ms Linley would therefore have known that the letter was not needed to inform Mrs Clough of the offer, as she already knew about it. The purpose of the letter requested by Mrs Clough could only have been to disclose information about the offer to a third party. [57] The letter provided to Mrs Clough was not addre...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 115 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT CN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. ET purchased a caravan from CN for $72,000 after seeing it advertised on [Online]. The caravan was advertised as being “set up for freedom camping or permanent living”. 2. ET uplifted the caravan on 5 May 2022. On 13 May, E...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 664 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT MH RESPONDENT WH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DN owns a property which shares a boundary with a property owned by MH and WH. In 2022 during preparation for landscaping work, DN identified that fencing surrounding her property had not been erected on legal boundary lines, and she soug...
...YOUNG GOO KANG v KYOUNG YONG LEE [2020] NZEmpC 37 [27 March 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 37 EMPC 103/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for freezing and ancillary orders BETWEEN YOUNG GOO KANG Applicant AND KYOUNG YONG LEE Respondent Hearing: 26 March 2020 (by telephone conference and subsequent submissions) Appearances:...
...EARTHMOVING LTD V MCTAGUE & ORS CHCH 17 May 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2010] NZEMPC 55 CRC 21/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination by the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the plaintiff for leave to amend pleadings as to the quantum of damages BETWEEN ROONEY EARTHMOVING LTD Plaintiff AND KELVIN DOUGLAS MCTAGUE First Defendant AND CLARENCE HENRY WHITING Second Defendant AND KERRY WAY...
A person who makes the application or claim is called the plaintiff.A person who has a claim made against them is called the defendant. What happens once a claim has been made After the time for filing a statement of reply has passed, even if a statement of reply has not been filed, a teleconference will be held. This will not be held straight away and the timing will depend on the Tribunal's workload. For any queries about a case you are involved in, please contact the case manager....