Search Results

Search results for claim form.

13020 items matching your search terms

  1. EQ v MT Ltd [2022] NZDT 45 (16 May 2022) [pdf, 109 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 45 APPLICANT EQ RESPONDENT MT Ltd The Tribunal orders: MT Ltd is to pay EQ the sum of $30,000.00 on or before 1 June 2022. Reasons: 1. In November 2021 EQ contracted to do earthworks at his property in [Town]. As part of the contract, fill taken from other sites would be delivered and used on the property. After the work...

  2. BI v O Inc [2024] NZDT 725 (21 October 2024) [pdf, 164 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 725 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT O Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim by BI is dismissed. Reasons 1. BI was a member of the O Inc. From 2022, he became unhappy with the views and services being provided by O Inc. He began voicing these concerns. Ultimately, after a series of complaints and counter-complaints, BI was expelled from O Inc....

  3. McDonald v Peters [2012] NZWHT Auckland 51 [pdf, 159 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101-000025 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 51 BETWEEN GREGORY JOHN MCDONALD Claimant AND TIMOTHY EDWARD PETERS First Respondent AND BUILDING APPROVALS AND SOLUTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MIKE HISLOP Third Respondent AND NEILL BROWN Fourth Respondent AND CARLTON RICHARDS Fifth Respondent AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND GRAEME SCOTT Seventh Respondent AND PHILIP HILLEARD E

  4. NT v OX & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 476 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...NT SECOND APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,822.67 to NT and OX on or before Tuesday, 23 May 2023. The balance of the claim is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 8 October 2022, the Applicants, NT and OX (together referred to as “the Applicants”), booked to fly with the Respondent, B Ltd, from [city 1] to [city 2] (via [city 3]) on 21 December 2022. B Ltd was operating the [city 1] to [city 3] leg, and X Ltd was operatin...

  5. Te Whare Maire Trust - Lot 5 DP 8663 (2005) 87 Ōpōtiki MB 238 (87 OPO 238) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

    ...of Maori Customary land pursuant to sections 18, 131 and 132 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. Initially, the application was brought for and on behalf of the whanau and beneficiaries of Whakatohea. Whakatohea and it's underlying HapO, it was claimed in the application, were tangata whenua in respect of the region where this land is situated beginning at Te Rangi in the east and ending at Te Horo in the west. The region includes within it, land referred to in the attached schedule t...

  6. KT & TL v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 666 (17 October 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 666 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. F Ltd is to pay TL and KT the sum of $23,474.50 on or before 6 November 2023. 2. TL and KT are entitled to a refund of the $6,525.50 held in relation to this building contract, in the lawyers’ escrow account, on or before 6 November 2023. Reasons: 1.

  7. EM v EI Ltd [2024] NZDT 366 (26 June 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 366 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT EI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. [1] EM signed up for a [diving course] with EI Ltd, represented by managing director SD. For various reasons, EM was unable to complete the course. He claims a refund from EI Ltd of the price that he paid. [2] The documents provided showed that EM signed a docum...

  8. IN v EW [2025] NZDT 3 (10 April 2025) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...she has not collected the fabric and dress pieces by 6 pm on 10 May 2025, EW can dispose of them in any manner he sees fit. K O'Shea Disputes Tribunal Referee 10 April 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  9. [2022] NZEmpC 191 McDermott v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2022] NZEmpC 191 [25 October 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 191 EMPC 172/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN JOHN McDERMOTT Applicant AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND EMPLOYSURE LIMITED Second Resp...

  10. KV v FT [2023] NZDT 481 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 481 APPLICANT AND RESPONDENT IN THE COUNTERCLAIM KV RESPONDENT FT APPLICANT IN THE COUNTERCLAIM LU APPLICANT IN THE COUNTERCLAIM’S INSURER X Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. FT is to pay KV $2000.00 on or before 5pm on 23 September 2023. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons...