12730 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1478 APPLICANT CO Ltd RESPONDENT GM Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: GM Ltd is to pay CO Ltd the sum of $15,000.00 on or before 16 August 2019. Reasons: 1. CO Ltd supplied stock to GM Ltd. In April and May 2019 orders were placed and the goods delivered to GM Ltd. GM Ltd has only sold a small portion of those items a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 780 APPLICANT IN RESPONDENT XI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: XI to pay X Ltd $3,962.44 by 10 February 2024. Reasons: 1. IN claims that on the 21 January 2023 XI was driving a vehicle [registration number] which collided with the rear of her vehicle twice as she was slowing down for traf...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 39 APPLICANT NJ APPLICANT SE RESPONDENT KN SECOND RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. NJ and SE own the property at [Address 1]. Their neighbours, KN and EN, own [Address 2]. These properties are two of four that are accessed via a shared driveway. Th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 198 APPLICANT FB RESPONDENT EE RESPONDENT YT The Tribunal orders: EE is to pay $916.36 to FB on or before Monday 22 May 2023. Reasons: 1. FB purchased a property from EE and took possession on 5 November 2021. After possession she discovered that all the elements on the ceramic stovetop could only operate on ful...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 123 APPLICANT CF RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: XQ Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,239.65 to CF on or before Friday 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2022, CF purchased a [computer] via [online platform] and paid $1,220.00 by bank transfer to an account in the name of XQ Ltd. He was promised that a shipping...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 21 APPLICANT FM RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. FM purchased some earbuds from T Ltd. After approximately 6 months the right earbud lost volume, so FM took them back to T Ltd. He was told there was detritus in the right earbud and given a cleaning guide, but found that cleani...
...apply merits and justice when reaching a decision and having done so I find the full rental cost should be paid. 4. For this reason I allow the claim. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 19 June 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 429 APPLICANT TD Ltd RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TD Ltd purchased flooring product from W Ltd which they installed in 10 tiny homes they built for customers. As the flooring product was being re-supplied in trade, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 does not apply to the purchase. 2. T...
...Pa Road is a County Road the consent of the Local Authority is required. Otherwise the consent of Transit New Zealand is required. If the surveyor can obtain and file the necessary consent, the file can be referred to the Court for orders. The applicant advised that Maraenui Pa Road was a county road, that consents had not been obtained and that the application was not ready to proceed. At 74 OPO 214 on 3 November 2000 the Court dismissed the application in terms of Rule 38(3)/94...
...panel repair shop on the 31 March 2022 and the 1 April 2022 seeking a quote for the repair of the left door and panel? Can BC claim ownership and privacy of the of the dashcam footage left with the vehicle from after the 29 March when the contract is claimed to have formed? c. Was the sale offered “as is where is” and accepted by ND. d. As a bailee of the truck, has BC failed to use reasonable care and skill to secure the safekeeping of the goods? e. Was BC under a duty to...