Search Results

1. T Ltd v EH & Ors [2024] NZDT 789 (6 October 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...cross notice. Such notice was not given and T Ltd is not entitled to a contribution from its neighbours, the H’s. For these reasons I must dismiss the claim. Referee: C Murphy Date: 6 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. XL v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 466 (7 June 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...actual costs of repairing damage sustained while the truck was hired to XL, even though the truck was hired to multiple other parties before a repair was arranged. Referee Perfect Date: 7 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. KT v EP [2024] NZDT 600 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...claimed be compensated $4,999.95 and as that amount is less than the reasonably foreseeable loss he has incurred, an order is made for that amount. Referee: Ms Cowie DTR Date: 30 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. QL v NQ [2025] NZDT 135 (28 March 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...boundary fence while he is the owner of the property, that is. NQ agrees to wait until there are new owners of the new lots before asking those new owners to contribute toward any boundary fence. 9. While this part of the agreement, which I note was formed when it was QL’s intention to sell empty lots, does have the effect that QL would not be contributing to the cost of a boundary fence while he owned the property, it does not provide for NQ to pay for a new boundary fence. She s...

5. BG v D Ltd [2025] NZDT 181 (5 May 2025) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...the reduction in value of the goods. The consumer may also obtain damages from the supplier for any reasonably foreseeable loss or damage. [10] Under the CGA, a seller is entitled to an opportunity to remedy. The respondent relies on this and now requests a chance to do so. It is too late. The applicant has been requesting a remedy for over 6 months. The respondent has repeatedly refused to offer one unless it was paid for its time and or the applicant bore the cost of returning the prod...

6. DD v E Ltd [2025] NZDT 279 (23 July 2025) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...it would have had if it had been restored by E Ltd to its pre-accident condition. [11] Thus, E Ltd must pay DD $590.00. Referee: C Hawes Date: 23 July 2025 Page 3 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. M Ltd v ND [2025] NZDT 277 (10 July 2025) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...Dealership] driver getting in the car and driving away without any evidence of smoke coming out of the exhaust. There is no evidence to persuade me that the pistons and rings had failed or that the car was blowing smoke at the time the contract was formed. ND was driving the car around without observing any problems. c) I find that it is more likely that the car developed a problem on the way to [City 2] and this problem may have been exacerbated by continuing to drive the car for anothe...

8. Form-30_Family-Invoice_Adoption.pdf [pdf, 217 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 30 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Adoption Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Please record t...

9. Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...by Mr McKee’s late father and from 2017 was owned by Mr McKee. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 3 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Mr Singh claims that during his employment, Mr McKee subjected him to racial harassment in breach of s 63 of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) as he commented on and made fun of his Indian accent, made belittling remarks about Indians and objected to hi...

10. Darby Trust v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 283 KB]

    ...framing below. [40] The parapet is not constructed as shown on the consented plans. Those plans showed the parapet being clad on sides and top with solid plaster on wire mesh. The top has a five degree back slope and the feature band is formed as part of the solid plaster cladding. [41] Metal cap flashings were installed to these surfaces, I assume in response to concerns about water entry. They are not shown on the consented plans, although were noted by the Council...